gandi changed their free mail service (advertised as a free addition to your domain) to paid one and it cost 4EUR/month per mailbox, there is also a yearly option, which cost 48EUR/year 😄
The service isn't bad, but I wouldn't say it's great in some way either.
@strk I already have a lot of things to manage and fun with selfhosted mail server is not what I'm looking for at the moment. I guess it's better to give this job to people, who do it professionally ;)
@abcdw Perhaps consider Runbox? Norway based email. Sign up and pay within 24 hours and get
2 years for the price of 1
on the Micro, Mini, Medium, and Max plans.
@fidel Yes, I briefly read about it, but it doesn't make much sense, I have my own gpg key and can encrypt it whenever I need and want.
Also, I had a conversation with a proton mail user and I recieved email from them encrypted, however I couldn't reply back with encryption, because it seems proton doesn't expose pgp public key via WKD (it could be related to additional setup not done on custom domain).
Proton mail doesn't want to be able to read your mails so your browser needs to unlock your mailbox. IMAP would require them to be able to read your mailbox so they provide you with the bridge so you can install IMAP on a host YOU trust.
@dgr@fidel I understand why the proton bridge is needed for imap access to proton, but I don't think it's right architectural decision. migadu's approach looks more apropriate to me: https://migadu.com/procon/#not-encrypted
@abcdw@fidel Not quite understand there approach from the link.
But I disagree on some of the points. Encryption on rest means it's a legal hurdle as much as a technological one and there hinting at the Hollywood scenario is stupid as IMHO the worries are nosy admins and greedy police states. I don't think I care about spam and viruses for encrypted mails. Also I could use the bridge to solve the search issue.
Add comment