scottsthoughts,
@scottsthoughts@better.boston avatar

Car infrastructure is incredibly expensive. It's unfortunate that we spend so much money to make our public spaces less pleasant and our planet less livable. I wish this were a bigger talking point, but there's always more money for pavement.

scottsthoughts,
@scottsthoughts@better.boston avatar

If you want a cheap to build, cheap to maintain infrastructure solution - /micromobility lanes! Bikes and other devices don't cause anywhere near the road damage that cars and trucks do, so they are much less expensive to maintain. Not to mention they are smaller and more fault tolerant than roads so they can be built for a fraction of the cost. Of course, that would require politicians to see micromobility as a valid form of transport first.

scottsthoughts,
@scottsthoughts@better.boston avatar

I will concede is more accessible to more people than micromobility, but is also more expensive. I'd love to see a comparison on per-mile construction and operating costs of passenger infrastructure vs car infrastructure though. I have a feeling that for the same service level, the rail infrastructure is going to end up being cheaper.

capntransit,
@capntransit@urbanists.social avatar

@scottsthoughts But is transit really more expensive, however you manage access, than bikes, scooters, etc.?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fuckcars
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines