Funny thing is, I’ll bet it’s the exact opposite for cis men. I’m willing to bet that if somebody actually did some blood tests, you’d see a surge of testosterone during and after the act compared to prior arousal. One that likely far outstrips the relevance of any dubious exposure to estrogen. I think we should perform this experiment. Maybe even see if there are differences between men and make some correlations.
i mean, presumably for all of us who like foreplay that’s because 1) it is a good part, and 2) it’s a requirement for the main event to actually be enjoyable.
It’s sorta like how the process of cooking and smelling the delicious aromas helps you get hungry and want to eat, whereas if you try to eat without even being hungry it’s actually pretty miserable…
What? Are you just going to take us at our words that we were always like this? Or are you going to be a real man and decide how you think it might work with no evidence besides what you suppose and notice and make your firm commitment to that conclusion everyone else’s problem?
It depends on the person, just like not every girl knows what their discharge taste like.
Some guys get curious, some guys would never(gross, homophobia, no interest), some guys involuntary do/have(surprise snowball, bad aim, she had a prior transaction).
There is a big difference between being curious once, avoiding eating residual creampie, and enjoying eating a cummy puss.
Imagine you are with a girl you just met, when was the last time she had cum in her? Was it last week? Was it last night? Was it this morning? Was it two hours ago? You have no idea if you are going to be slurping up her grool or some dude’s seed.
Imagine you and your long-term girlfriend had sex this morning, does she still have cum in her at 8pm? Maybe you had sex last night, does she have cum in her the next morning? How about 8pm? When is it “safe” to go down on her without cumming in your own mouth via a 3rd party?
Add comment