We should all consider the meta of the situation as well, with an upcoming Republican candidate election, and the need to drive people out to the voting booth.
Honestly asking for second opinions: Looking at the report of the actual proposal, it seems to only target sexual content containing people under 18? Am I missing something?
I don’t know if I’ve got this right but it would appear that the proposal will broaden the law holding the definition for child pornography to include watching porn and sexting. So you’ll wind up as the same category of a sexual predator as an actual child molester.
Honestly asking for second opinions: Looking at the report of the actual proposal, it seems to only target sexual content containing people under 18? Am I missing something?
Based on a picture in the article of the first page of the law as its written, it seems to be modifying/enhancing an existing law that currently only affects minors, broadening it so that it covers all ages, and under new additional rules. IANAL.
I also ANAL but I can’t imagine this would ever gain any traction outside of drumming up publicity and self-promotion for the guy. This is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment regardless of one’s personal politics.
I love watching our clueless citizens just allow this descent into fascism. Who knew it would be as simple as just not teaching kids what the word means.
""We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…"
Everybody’s saying this will never go anywhere, but y’all, as someone from Oklahoma, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if this bill made it through. I mean yeah, it’d definitely be struck down in court if it did, but I could easily see it happening. 乁( ಠ_ಠ )ㄏ
Add comment