fadhl3y, Is there a link to Engoron’s ruling anywhere?
Ixoid, Don’t forget about the immigrant labourers and contractors he regularly forgot to pay
CharlesDarwin, Well for doing something like that he might really be fucked. It’s one thing to throw an insurrection and plot a coup, but fuck with other elitists? Well, well.
Just ask Madoff.
morphballganon, Lock him up! Lock him up!
Pratai, Further proving that he is not a self-made success. If it weren’t for theft and fleecing, he’d be a penniless bum. Dude faked his way to wealth.
TechyDad, IIRC, he turned himself into a millionaire after inheriting a few billion from his father.
Pratai, Which is not self-made. And I LOVE how you phrased that. Clever!
YurkshireLad, “Engoron’s ruling…”
Is that something from Lord of the Rings?
TechyDad, Engoron the judge, rarely mentioned little brother of Aragorn the ranger.
FlyingSquid, You enter Engoron’s Ruling. Roll for perception.
solidgrue, I keep reading it as “Enron’s ruling” and, not gonna lie, it’s stressing me the F out.
morphballganon, Or The Legend of Zelda (gorons)
Scooter411, This is my shocked face
LetterboxPancake, German Huh, it doesn’t look different. What about mine?
teuast, no, that one doesn’t look any different either
Rapidcreek, From the story:
“Engoron’s ruling, in a phase of the case known as summary judgment, resolves the key claim in James’ lawsuit, but six others remain.
Engoron is slated to hold a non-jury trial starting Oct. 2 before deciding on those claims and any punishments he may impose. James is seeking $250 million in penalties and a ban on Trump doing business in New York, his home state. The trial could last into December, Engoron has said.
Trump’s lawyers had asked the judge to throw out the case, which he denied. They contend that James wasn’t legally allowed to file the lawsuit because there isn’t any evidence that the public was harmed by Trump’s actions. They also argued that many of the allegations in the lawsuit were barred by the statute of limitations.”
TechyDad, “there isn’t any evidence that the public was harmed by Trump’s actions.”
Trump in his (inevitable) rant is claiming that the banks were paid back the money so there should be no case. The problem is that fraud is fraud. If I steal $100 from you, use it to bet on horse racing, and hit it big, giving you $100 back doesn’t absolve me from the initial theft charges. It doesn’t matter if Trump’s fraud resulted in him paying the banks back. The fraud still happened.
clutch, (edited ) When banks loan against property and the collateral is the property itself, there should be an independent revaluation of the property to ensure the bank is not running into excessive risk by lending say, $300, on a property that is worth $200. In case the borrower default, then the banks sells the property for $200, but losses $100 because the property was only worth $200.
Trump claiming that banks never saw losses indicate that bank relationship managers were complicit in using distorted valuations to lend, potentially violating internal credit rules established by their own employers.
Another possibility is that Trump actually defaulted multiple times but banks do not publicly admit it.
Add comment