floofloof,

The problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn’t universal is also capitalism.

cyber_kalashnikov,

The problem is capitalism,

Perfect! Now if we had a way to end it…

zagaberoo,

It’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.

hellishharlot,

Making money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish

CanadaPlus,

I’m still waiting for someone to propose in detail an alternative.

argv_minus_one,

Yeah, that’s the problem. We don’t have the requisite technology to build a Star Trek utopia. If only we did…

ShadyGrove,

Well, if everything ran Linux…

ursakhiin,

There’s a bunch of ways to allocate resources but ideas like money have an advantage of allowing people to choose how they live.

A good example would be that not every person would be satisfied living in an apartment in the city. Some prefer living more rural for any number of reasons. Some want to be inside playing video games and others outside biking on a mountain. Some want to be able to do both. Giving them the ability to choose small apartment in the city or bigger house in the woods is important for happiness.

The biggest issue is the discrepancy of resource allocation between individuals not the method that allocation is done on paper.

vrkr,
@vrkr@programming.dev avatar

The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish

Money not necessarily, we need to calculate costs (and minimize it) in distributed fashion.

BatmanAoD,

And the only reasonably successful way we’ve found so far for doing so is…money.

IWantToFuckSpez,

Aren’t the majority of computers already on Linux? Unless you mean desktops

Unforeseen,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Asudox,
    @Asudox@lemmy.world avatar

    Windows Server for usage in actual servers? Those companies must be retarded to the core.

    alcasa,

    Windows Server is rather common in large enterprise software. All the stuff you pray you never have to interface with

    Asudox,
    @Asudox@lemmy.world avatar

    It sure is convenient. You get a user friendly GUI. But the stability, the resource intensity and the spyware. It’s really a retarded decision to build your servers on Windows Server.

    msage,

    Yes, but some software, and it’s usually a financial application, requires a Windows Server.

    I’ve seen it more than once, as I had to set up the machine, I was dying inside, but there was just no alternative that the accounting could use.

    LinuxSBC,

    It’s really common. The IT people know how to use Windows, and they need Active Directory to manage their Windows devices, so they just use Windows Server.

    CookieOfFortune,

    There’s probably one computer at most per employee, but each employee already has a non Windows cell phone. Most servers run Linux. Then there’s Linux in a bunch of small devices as well. Windows is a small part of that pie and only getting smaller.

    linearchaos,
    @linearchaos@lemmy.world avatar

    Majority… yeah, Android smartphone and servers would be a really really big number.

    GammaScorpii,

    Most computers in the world are not desktops

    milkjug,
    @milkjug@lemmy.world avatar

    Probably done in jest, but this reads like the 100,000,000th “agree?” bullshit post on LinkedIn.

    tsonfeir,
    @tsonfeir@lemm.ee avatar

    No one would agree on the visual design, and most people would just want an unstyled box because it’s more efficient.

    cyber_kalashnikov,

    You mean GNU Kernel?

    jhulten,

    All monocultures suck.

    superbirra,

    but GNU?

    QuazarOmega,

    It’s just that nobody gnu

    Sigmatics,

    So you mean we would have weird useless concrete structures everywhere? I doubt it

    marcos,

    Is that image supposed to represent an utopia?

    Nioxic,

    Its urban hell, but a few more trees

    boeman,

    Ahh… It’s Gentoo

    Boogeyman4325,

    Not really. Having heterogeneity among operating systems is better than pure homogeneity. Say, if everyone ran Linux, and some massive security flaw was discovered, we would all be screwed at the same time. However, if we ran different stuff, and some massive security hole was found for just one operating system, then only a small portion of the world is vulnerable at once. Besides, more operating systems can lead to more innovation, as long as there is good competition between them.

    Kolanaki,
    @Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

    If the whole world focused and used just 1 OS for every system for a long enough time line, I think it would evolve fast enough to reach a point of perfection, where there are no security holes or flaws of any kind. I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it. Eventually the best way to do everything an OS needs to do would be found; it would be faster if there was only 1 OS to work with to reach that point.

    Nintendo,

    where there are no security holes or flaws of any kind

    this in itself is straight up impossible to know or prove. when can you say your program has no vulnerabilities? ever hear of zerodays? finding the best way to do everything in software will never be found or stay constant either.

    ech0,

    Must be nice to be so ignorant…

    KairuByte,
    @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it.

    Language has many ways of expressing the same thing, is there an objectively best way to do it?

    Is that sentence the best way to ask that question?

    argv_minus_one,

    I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it.

    I’ve been writing code in one form or another for some 30 years now, and my observation so far has been the exact opposite: there are many problems in programming for which there is no one clearly superior solution, even in theory. Just like life in general, programming is full of trade-offs, compromises, and diminishing returns.

    Gargari,

    It does run on Linux 😁😁😁

    vrkr,
    @vrkr@programming.dev avatar

    No place for bazaar. Looks more like corporations wet dream.

    CanadaPlus,

    I mean, you could put one inside a building, I guess. It’s really just a very downscale mall.

    mexicancartel,

    Linux kernel

    Nah bro, chrome OS is fucking ridiculous not to mention android too.

    We need the other linux not just kernel.

    deft,

    how easy is linux? i see so many memes now and i wanna switch but I’m not confident in it

    TechCodecPawx,

    Start by exploring Linux Mint or ZorinOS… Both are optimized to feel like Windows… You can watch YouTube videos about them to understand what I mean

    F04118F,

    At the risk of analysis paralysing you… But if you have an Nvidia video card, I would start with Pop!_OS

    MJBrune,

    I recently tried pop os but gnome did not seem reasonable for me on multiple monitors.

    F04118F,

    Thanks for your addition! It is working fine for me, but I may have changed the config a bit from the default, don’t remember everything. I have default tiling now and that works really well.

    MJBrune,

    One of the things that is a must for me is 1 panel that shows the windows and apps per monitor. I can’t work any other way, I’m not looking to drastically change my workflow more so than Linux alone already is. My quick Google search said that it wasn’t possible on Gnome 44 and I gave up.

    That said, KDE is laggy and unresponsive. It’s also fairly unusable. Everything else besides those 2 is like going back 20 years to desktop environments of the olden days. I just want something modern that works with my workflow.

    argv_minus_one,

    If you have an NVIDIA video card, I would start with buying AMD or Intel instead. Attempting to use NVIDIA with Linux will result in misery.

    LucyLastic,

    Linux Mint is easier to use than Windows

    frippa,
    @frippa@lemmy.ml avatar

    Seconding that, made the switch and nothing broke since(almost 2 months now, ^o^) . Can’t say that for windows tho, where not only auto updates meant I had to wait half an hour to use my PC half of the time or disable them and not be up to date with security, but the OS itself was riddled with problems, sometimes just opening Firefox with a few tabs (like 4 or so) would bsod (and I have 16 gigs of ddr4 ram, so it wasn’t a ram problem) not to mention now that I’m on Mint everything is faster, I didn’t have to pay a license key and I know my OS isn’t trying to fight me for my data.

    MrSlicer,

    You can easily try it out by booting from usb.

    sharkfucker420,

    It’s pretty easy imo if you start with a Debian distro

    stilgar,
    @stilgar@infosec.pub avatar

    No, you missed the homeless encampments, forest fires and car centric cities.

    There’s no apt install utopia.

    Llewellyn,

    Because you have forgotten sudo

    cyber_kalashnikov,

    I knew he was missing something. Thank you!

    linearchaos,
    @linearchaos@lemmy.world avatar

    Maybe theyre already root?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • programmer_humor@programming.dev
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines