Lots of people are in my mentions today telling me that I'm irresponsible for believing in and recommending creative commons share alike licensing, and accusing me of being deceptive or somehow harmful for preferring cc-by-sa works for the magazine I'm running.
I usually don't rise to greet these kinds of complaints, but there have been a couple today, and all of them carry an accusatory tone, one explicitly accuses me of being ethically corrupt for saying that I prefer submissions under a creative commons by-sa license, but I will consider other licenses.
I feel compelled to address this, because it's fucking ridiculous, and it's irresponsible to pretend otherwise.
