brucelawson, 6 months ago

Formstack support replied you can't add autocomplete attribs but I should file a feature request. They told me Formstack is ""substantially 508 Compliant" (whatever that means) and "click here!" (lol) to find out more, but the "here" link is a 404. Fills me with confidence. https://help.formstack.com/s/article/Are-Formstack-Forms-508-Compliant

marcus, 6 months ago

@brucelawson Who doesn’t love both reactions like this and the famous substantial WCAG compliance 🎉

aardrian, 6 months ago

@brucelawson Time to ask for the VPAT / ACR to understand their definition of “substantial”.

brucelawson, 6 months ago

@aardrian There's a helpful mention of VPATs at https://help.formstack.com/s/article/Is-Formstack-WCAG-Compliant

aardrian, 6 months ago

@brucelawson That is… wow.

patrick_h_lauke, 6 months ago

@brucelawson related: 508 still references WCAG 2.0, so the "new" 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose (which I assume is the cause for your autocomplete query) from 2.1 isn't necessarily covered by being "508 compliant" (urgh)

patrick_h_lauke, 6 months ago

@brucelawson related: god, this makes me sound like a right hoot at parties...

patrick_h_lauke, 6 months ago

@brucelawson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-Eldr7aV74

brucelawson, 6 months ago

@patrick_h_lauke A party ain't a party without VPAT Lauke, spinning the tunes on his longdecks

brucelawson, 6 months ago

@patrick_h_lauke There is a very enlightening 'Is Formstack WCAG Compliant?' page https://help.formstack.com/s/article/Is-Formstack-WCAG-Compliant

patrick_h_lauke, 6 months ago

@brucelawson magic...

marcus, 6 months ago

@brucelawson As far as I remember, providing autocomplete values is not a way to fullfill 3.3.7, I think I stumbled over a link, still looking for it, will provide once I find it

brucelawson, 6 months ago

@marcus Thanks! I agree it don't guarantee compliance, but I do want to be able to hint to autocomplete where I can

marcus, 6 months ago

@brucelawson It can guarantee compliance for 1.3.5 when done right, tho

marcus, 6 months ago

@brucelawson Ah, it was the Understanding doc. Leaving this here for anyone stumbling over this Toot: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/redundant-entry.html