LeftistLawyer,
@LeftistLawyer@kolektiva.social avatar

There are too many people on the planet.

This is axiomatic.

But because a few fucking piece of shit nazis agree with this self-obvious statement we can no longer have a productive discussion about it because all people want to talk about are the few fucking nazis who talked about it.

Can we please appreciate how wrong that is?

Can we appreciate how horribly rhetorical "point scoring" has damaged productive discourse?

Duusi,
@Duusi@jorts.horse avatar

@LeftistLawyer There isn't though? It has been shown how the Earth is perfectly cabable of providing for every human on it and more.

Is this toot an attempt to frame the valid critique of Malthusian brainworms as some kind of an overreach? What is this "point scoring" you refer to? Seems to me that the far more accepted position in this discourse for the average Westerner tends to sadly be the one that leads to ecofascist thinking.

https://jacobin.com/2021/08/ipcc-sixth-assessment-report-climate-change-denial

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines