I've never said "Cooperation" is a disregarding/downplaying sense, I made a clear differentiation between Cooperation and Foundation.
But as a Cooperation usually follows the will of their owners, I thought it's important to point out that the Mozilla Cooperation is fully owned by the Mozilla Foundation while Google is owned by Alphabet which is owned by their shareholders, like for example the Vanguard Group, BlackRock or JP Morgan Chase and so on.
There is definitely a lot of room to speculate what the intentions of the Mozilla Foundation are, especially of the current board members, but I'm pretty sure that we all have a pretty clear vision what the intention of those investment companies is.
So I've just pointed out that I think the motivations behind their actions are completely different.
Again, I dislike a LOT of what Mozilla is doing in the recent years. If you ask me they should completely drop everything non Browser related and cut the team down to max 100 people. A Firefox Foundation if you so will.
But when judging about people, groups or organizations, I think it's important to also think about why they act the way they act and not just what they did.