lauren, (edited )
@lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org avatar

Large tech firms these days with lax security don't seem to ever pay a significant price for the hassles caused to their users when user data breaches occur. Perhaps if the CEOs of these companies were held directly responsible in a more direct way, they'd work harder on their security systems. What should be done with these CEOs?

TomSwirly,
@TomSwirly@toot.community avatar

@lauren That was a hard one. Public flogging is more fun, jailing is more effective.

lauren,
@lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org avatar

@TomSwirly Are you sure? Locking up people for nonviolent offenses who could otherwise be doing useful work under direction is just wasting resources and talent in many cases.

gpk,
@gpk@pgh.social avatar

@lauren Why not the stocks?

lauren,
@lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org avatar

@gpk They usually already have lots of stocks. Sorry, couldn't resist. Pillories work too.

Yorkshiregeek,
@Yorkshiregeek@mastodon.social avatar

@lauren fines but a % not a random number they can pay from petty cash or a lunchtime expense

lauren,
@lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org avatar

@Yorkshiregeek Like in at least one Scandinavian country where traffic tickets are based on the income ...

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • khanakhh
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • everett
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines