@civodul
> "Also, my thoughts go to the developers of “small” C compilers like MesCC and TinyCC"
LOL! Well, is it really that bad? I thought MesCC does not need to be fully compliant with the C standard, it just needs to be able to compile the Mes fork of TinyCC. As long as TinyCC can compile GCC (and the GCC code base may not make use of this new feature for a while yet), it should be OK for a little while, right?