vascorsd, to programming
@vascorsd@mastodon.social avatar

Been having fun with , made more than a hundred lines of code with it. It's really refreshing having a language that compiles fast and takes barely any memory and cpu to run.

Not having to care about the build tool too much, hundreds of compiler flags, language versions, compiler plugins, formatting plugins, or any of the usual things that fill the brain I'm used to in is a huge breath of fresh air.

Not having to care about the JVM is amazing.

vascorsd, to programming
@vascorsd@mastodon.social avatar

cool thing about playing with is that it actually runs on my laptop without making it hot and putting the fans in crazy mode.

compiles and runs fast, few MBs of memory.

creating a binary with gleescript creates a script that makes the application run on erlang vm and it works without much ceremony and again without killing my memory and taking all my swap space.

it's a nice change of pace compared to the usual that can't run without 4 jvm processes killing the machine 🙄

frescosecco, to programming
@frescosecco@mastodon.social avatar

Gleam now has about the same number of Github stars as Erlang OTP! :)
This is awesome and well-deserved. Maybe folks can also give Erlang a star while they're at it?
https://github.com/gleam-lang/gleam
https://github.com/erlang/otp

duelinmarkers, to random
@duelinmarkers@hachyderm.io avatar

I've been programming professionally long enough to know no language is perfect, but I'm (cautiously) deeply excited to see reach 1.0. https://gleam.run/news/gleam-version-1/

macleod, to haskell

Various thoughts on too many programming languages, for no discernible reason.

I have been interested in Go since it's very initial release, but their dependence on Google is uncharming to say the least. I still haven't made up my mind on its GC, but its definitely better than most.

I used to do some ML work in .NET and if it wasn't dependent on Microsoft it would be a heavy contender for a great language, but it has far too many Microsoft-isms to ever really go much farther.

Rust is great, I enjoy beating my head against a brick wall battling with the compiler, and their safety is great, but overly complicated and feature-creep is a real problem on that entire project. I do a lot of work these days in Rust, for better (mostly) or worse (mostly-ish).

C is my bread-and-butter, as is Javascript for quick prototyping.

Elixir is great, but Erlang is unwieldy, the community is growing, but not fast enough - and I just can't get my mind to enjoy the syntax no matter how nice it is.

D is a lot of fun, but their GC can be slow at times, and the community is very small and packages are often broken and unmaintained.

Python was my first true love, but I really can't stand the whitespace, again love the language, hate the syntax.

Zig is fun, but just that. Fast, nimble, but early days, a bit confusing, could replace my insistence on C for core projects, but again, early days. I love to use them as a compiler for C, much faster than the defaults on any of the others.

Odin is one I love to keep an eye on, I wish I could get behind using it for more things. When I first took notice ~4 years ago the documentation was a bit scattered, but it looks much better now. The developer behind it is incredibly cool, could be seen as the next Dennis Ritchie imo. Runes are dope. The syntax is by far my favourite.

Julia, I love Julia, but performance last I tested was a bit of a miss, and by miss, it required a decent chunk of compute for basics, but when you gave it the system to throttle, it would be insanely productive to write in. Javascript is something that I prototype even syscalls in, but Julia is just the same but much better and more productive (and less strange) in many regards. I am really hoping this takes over in the ML/Data world and just eats Python alive. I've heard there has been major work in the perf department, but I haven't had reason to try it out lately.

Ada, memory safety before Rust! Great language, especially for critical applications, decades of baggage (or wisdom), slow moving language, insanely stable, compilers are all mostly proprietary, job market is small, but well paid, great for robotics, defense, and space industry types, but the syntax is... rough. Someone should make a meta-language on top of Ada like Zig/Nim/Odin do for C, or Elixir does for Erlang.

The others: Carbon, haven't tried; Nim, prefer when they were "Nimrod" (cue Green Day), decent but not my style; Crystal, seems cool, but not for me; Scala, great FP language, but JVM; Haskell, I'm not a mathematician, but my mathematician friends love it. I see why, but not my thing as much as I love functional languages. I'll try it again, eventually. I did not learn Haskell a great good.

I tend to jump from language to language, trying everything out, it's fun and a total timesuck.

[ # ] :: #c #d

leobm,
@leobm@norden.social avatar

@marcuse1w @macleod If you like , is an option. With there is also a stable erlang backend. Or I find very exciting in the erlang world (erlang and Javascript backend). Otherwise you might also like (native and wasm backend) if you are generally into ML languages. I also think is an extremely nice language. I've never understood what many people have against the syntax. I find it extremely simple and beautiful. Well, I also like 😉

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • GTA5RPClips
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • everett
  • vwfavf
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines