BmeBenji

@BmeBenji@lemm.ee

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

BmeBenji,

If this is “Brick House” by The Commodores I might just lose it

BmeBenji,

“When I’m in command, every mission is a suicide mission.”

BmeBenji,

You call in a 500 KG bomb right next to your fellow Helldiver “The key to victory is the element of surprise”

It hits the ground

“SURPRISE” boom

BmeBenji,

“Here’s to us poor schmos working for the man. Even if he is a hot, sexy, female man.”

BmeBenji,

I was thinking he would say that if you called in an exosuit lol

BmeBenji,

“Some of you may die, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make for democracy”

BmeBenji,

Came here to say this. Those motherfuckers take down cats, dogs, AND wolves

BmeBenji,

If you haven’t heard Gojira’s song about the idea of Oroborus, spend the next 5 minutes doing yourself a favor

BmeBenji,

When I first saw HDR on an OLED monitor, it wasn’t everything I thought people were making it out to be but over time it really grew on me. DOOM Eternal, Horizon: Zero Dawn, and Cyberpunk 2077 have so much color, and the way the light pops makes it all just pure eye candy.

BmeBenji,

I’m firmly of the opinion that it takes as much faith to believe that this universe had no sentient creator as it does to believe that it had one.

BUT believing in a creator does not mean that you have to ignore scientific evidence of the way the universe functions

BmeBenji, (edited )

It comes from the fact that there is no empirical evidence that a creator doesn’t exist (because evidence of a lack of existence is illogical) and from the fact that there is no explanation for the beginning of the universe that is logically sound (at least not yet). An infinite timeline doesn’t make more sense than an external being setting the timeline in motion

BmeBenji,

It sounds like you’re describing science and religion like they’re completely separate things, but I don’t see it that way at all. I wouldn’t describe science as a religion, but there’s definitely faith involved in the current dominant scientific theories. Until theory has been tested to exhaustion and there are no more tests to run, the theory lives on as a theory because it hasn’t been disproven (either fully or partially) and there is an assumption that it will not be disproven. That assumption is faith.

BmeBenji,

You’re missing my point even though you’re so close to getting it. Because we lack sufficient evidence for both the purpose of proving there is a creator/creative force/god AND for the purpose of proving there is no god, it takes faith to believe in either. I suppose you could claim to believe in neither. I suppose agnosticism doesn’t really take faith.

BmeBenji, (edited )

By that standard, it takes as much faith to believe that this universe had no sentient creator as it does to believe it was created by space bees or whatever.

Yup, that’s my point. It takes faith to believe a creator does not exist.

It doesn’t take faith to not believe in a creator.

That’s a good point. I hadn’t considered agnosticism in this conversation. Refusing to accept something as true without evidence does not take faith. However, I maintain that it takes faith to assert that there is no god/creator since we do not have actual evidence of this.

BmeBenji,

There is no evidence that a sentient creator exists or created the universe.

And there is no evidence that the universe appeared out of a void. I do not mean to say that it only makes sense to believe in a god/creator, I just meant to say that it makes as much sense to believe that there is a god as it does to believe that there is no god. I would argue it takes faith to do either, however it doesn’t take faith to say you would not believe either without evidence.

Why can’t there be multiple creators? Why does the creator have to be sentient? And who created the creator? Has the creator always existed?

I have no answers for this question that don’t involve what I personally believe on faith and not on evidence, and I cannot make any sensible effort to try to convince you of it so I won’t.

either way something has always existed, yours just has one extra step.

I agree something has likely always existed, and whatever it is I would call it “the creator.” I have my own personal beliefs about the creator being sentient but I have no proof of that.

BmeBenji,

Please, tell me what evidence there is because most people seem to enjoy withholding it

BmeBenji,

So how is theory defined in the scientific setting?

BmeBenji,

I truly understand the belief that the existence of evil contradicts the idea of an all-knowing and/or good creator, but I firmly believe that it doesn’t. The definitions of “good” and “evil” are so difficult to nail down that I don’t think the existence or perception of these concepts can disprove the existence of something that caused the big bang or something that guided evolution to the conception of humanity. Evil itself is a concept of morality and morality itself is extremely nebulous.

I agree our physical laws don’t leave room for the supernatural but that’s because we can’t reproduce the supernatural under the experimentational parameters which produced the definitions/theories of our physical laws.

The explanation for the big bang doesn’t explain how the rules of logic by which we theorized its origin came into existence.

I don’t understand your final point about violations of logic. I don’t think any explanation for the origin of our universe and the logic that exists within it can be explained using the rules of logic that are contained within our universe.

I understand that what I believe is not what everyone will or should believe, but I’m fairly certain what you listed is not evidence in the concrete sense.

I highly, highly recommend giving this book a read! I would call it 'Scholar Core' or 'Letters Core' if I were 12, female, American and addicted to Chinese social media application... (programming.dev)

My original intention in reading this book was to see if it’s straightforward to build a shcal(1) UNIX utility, which would be the Solar Hijri version of cal(1) (link to specs) POSIX-standardized utility. It is 10 days past Nowruz so I can still make it seasonal....

BmeBenji,

Born too late to have to fix the Y2K problem, born too soon to have to consider Mars’ time zones in the database, born just in time to have most time zone problems solved before I even got involved

BmeBenji,

I was just commenting on the fact that programming to handle time zone conversions (and daylight savings time) is difficult enough without having to factor planetary orbit into the equation. Colonization aside, even if we found native martians had a calendar they were “currently” using, writing a program to convert from any Earth calendar time to native Martian calendar time would be an astronomical pain in the ass.

Sounds like you might have a lot of hatred in you. I hope you’re going to therapy. I am for that exact reason.

BmeBenji,

What do you mean? In what way am I being ignorant? I thought the whole idea was satirical and satire only works if you’re painfully aware of that which is being satirized. I think the empirical system of measurement is absurd since all the metrics are based off of completely subjective concepts. The only thing the empirical system is good for is being relatable to human minds. A foot is roughly a foot’s length. 100 degrees F is “hot” and 0 degrees F is cold. A cup is about a fistful. Etc.

BmeBenji,

That’s not bad, but is there a digital equivalent of a horse we could use?

BmeBenji,

We need a Helldiver voice that sounds like Zapp Branigan 

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • cubers
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines