Viking_Hippie

@Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Viking_Hippie, (edited )

If they had thoughts, they wouldn’t be Log Cabin Republicans.

Viking_Hippie,

Now now, not even TRUMP would be that cruel!

Viking_Hippie,

They won’t because those donors probably give to both parties and are friends with the owners of the neoliberal outlets such as WaPo, NYT, MSNBC etc.

To quote George Carlin: it’s a big club and you ain’t in it.

Viking_Hippie,

And if you can’t cook (because reasons) a man can game.

Viking_Hippie,

Probably much better than the 4 year shit show that would otherwise happen, though 🤷

Viking_Hippie,

It is not all that bad. Wealth creation needs peace

All the wars for oil and other resources would disagree.

So would the obscene profits of the military industrial complex.

Viking_Hippie,

Sure, but the US starts and supports a lot more wars than any other country and wastes as many tax dollars on it as the next ten countries combined, so it’s fair to single them out.

Viking_Hippie,

KTLA journalist David Lazarus said: “The simple fact is that if we did away with the archaic Electoral College, a man like this would never again get within reach of the presidency.”

That’s true. In the short term, though, it’s looking more and more obvious that we also need to get rid of the archaic incumbent before November, lest his stubborn insistence on aiding and abetting dozens of ongoing crimes against humanity alienates enough voters that the Mango Mussolini wins and does away with democracy altogether.

Viking_Hippie,

Rule 6: No Slams, no Blasts

Viking_Hippie,

Hell yeah, brother/sister/other! ✊

Viking_Hippie,

Not really, no. Our sensory experiences are the brain reacting to objectively real things rather than creating them. We know that they are objectively real because too many people experience them, usually in similar if not identical ways that the chance of it being coincidental or a shared delusion is astronomically remote.

The scientific method + Occam’s Razor says the world objectively and verifiably exists outside of our brains, beeyotch! drops mic

Viking_Hippie,

what we perceive as the world can never be determined because we perceive things differently.

I’d actually argue that that is proof that the world CAN be determined: if several people with different perception and perspectives agree on how something looks, feels, tastes etc, that commonality in spite of differences is proof that the shared experience of something is objectively real.

many of us don’t even see the exact same colors for example

But most of us do, which can’t be a coincidence.

And this can be extended to quantum physics even when you consider that certain things are based on when they are observed.

Hey! No fair bringing physics to a philosophy discussion! How would you like it if I used football to prove that golf is boring? 😉

Viking_Hippie,

90% of people only perceive others as either men or women.

That sounds ridiculously high. Where’s that study from, Prager U? 😛

Even if they see a nonbinary person, their occipital lobe would still generate a man schema or a woman schema

That’s a learned bias though, not an inherent state of the occipital lobe or any other part of the brain.

Are you gonna use that as evidence that binary gender is objectively real, because billions of people wouldn’t hallucinate it

Nope. I’m gonna use that as an example of learned bias and other outside influences can affect how we experience the world in a very literal sense. In fact, I just did. Twice.

Cause that’s the same argument you’re making now.

Nope, not at all. Please stow away all strawmen before proceeding.

And it’s not an empirical argument.

It is and it isn’t: paradoxically, it’s impossibly to establish the existence of objective reality with 100% certainty.

That being said, what IS possible is logically deducing a conclusion so overwhelmingly likely that there’s no valid counterargument.

To give you an example: the only way to know without a doubt that the sun is hot is to touch it yourself. Given that it’s impossible to get to it and touch it, we rely on more indirect measuring which are still reliable to the point that no well-informed and rational person doubts that the sun is indeed very, very hot.

That’s how both logic and science works: in the absence of the possibility to positively prove or disprove something, you rely on what’s most likely.

Viking_Hippie,

Absolute nonsense. That’s like saying that you lose your voice in order to fill out a health insurance card as you wait for treatment. Don’t put des hoarse before des carte.

Viking_Hippie,

Yeah, someone arguing that there’s no objective reality WOULD claim that the best method to objectively prove reality depends on already believing in objective reality.

I’ve seen coins less circular than your logic.

Viking_Hippie,

Not what I meant but yes, they are indeed participating by providing weapons and gaslighting people on behalf of the fascist apartheid regime.

Viking_Hippie,

Ah ok. Either way, the Dem leadership isn’t an ally to the Left. They’re the less odious of two adversaries.

Viking_Hippie, (edited )

Nope. The idea is that it’s okay to say things about white RACISTS that it would make no sense saying about any other people, white or not.

“White racist” isn’t any more a race than for example “black embezzler” or “Japanese bigamist”

Viking_Hippie,

I’ve had it with your ridiculous strawmen. I’ve told you what you need to know (that white people aren’t inherently racist and it’s therefore not racist to call out racism, including racism specific to white racists) and you keep trying to twist it into something it’s not.

I don’t know if you’re a racist yourself, if you’re just a pedant, or if you really believe that you have a valid and important point, but you don’t. Not even close.

Viking_Hippie,

Basically your whole pov is based on the fact that you think the IDF are targeting civilians

Fixed it for you. It’s not something I think. It’s not in question. It’s established fact.

Since you’re clearly set in that opinion

Again, not an opinion. They’ve said so themselves.

if they really do target civilians… Do you think the numbers would truly be 1:2 Hamas:civilian?

Nope, but that ratio is the low end of the IDF PR division estimate. The real ratio is closer to 1:4

…you know what? As I read on, you’re not giving me anything except more lies and distortions regurgitated from AIPAC and other PR outlets for the Israeli apartheid regime. That and signs of you simply not understanding or not wanting to.

So since I won’t be able to help you undrink the kool-aid, I’m gonna atop wasting time and effort on you. Have the day you deserve.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • love
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines