inb4_FoundTheVegan

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

Wtf are you even talking about? People should have the right to control if they are “approximated” as nude. You can wax poetic how it’s not nessecarily correct but that’s because you are ignoring the woman who did not consent to the process. Like, if I posted a nude then that’s on the internet forever. But now, any picture at all can be made nude and posted to the internet forever. You’re entirely removing consent from the equation you ass.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

My body is not inherently for your sexual simulation. Downloading my picture does not give you the right to turn it in to porn.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

WTF?

There is a huge ass difference between your personal thoughts and using a subjects social media, a database of existing nudes and AI to have REAL MEDIA produced.

Seriously, not even remotely similar and its frankly disturbing that this is even your thought process.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

It takes years of pratice to draw photorealism, and days if not weeks to draw a particular piece. Which is absolutely not the same to any jackass with an net connection and 5 minutes to create a equally/more realistic version.

It’s really upsetting that this argument keeps getting brought up. Because while guys are being philosophical about how it’s therotically the same thing, women are experiencing real world harm and harassment from these services. Women get fired for having nudes, girls are being blackmailed and bullied with this shit.

But since it’s theoretically always been possible somehow churning through any woman you find on Instagram isn’t an issue.

Totally get your frustration

Do you? Since you aren’t threatened by this, yet another way for women to be harassed is just a fun little thought experiment.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

There is a huge ass difference between your imagination and REAL MEDIA using my face. This is a absolute bullshit justification.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

There is nothing stopping anyone from using it on my body. Seriously, get a fucking grip.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

Is a picture no different than an immigration? Is CGI not a picture because it used a computer?

Of course not because REAL MEDIA is being produced. Your thoughts never leave your head, these images are being used to harass and blackmail women. Your argument is completely asinine.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

Scroll back up.

Undress any girl for free

Delete clothing

Entirely screw off with this gaslighting BS.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

lmao

It’s not thoughtcrime you giant crybaby.

But thinking about something and using tools to visualize it are not crimes.

This is SUCH a huge leap. You have a right to your thoughts, not databases, programming and services to generate media.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

As a fan of cyberpunk, that’s so cool.

Depressing, dystopian, a legitimate problem that was sorta inevitable. But also truly hilarious.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

the man refused to exit his vehicle and identified himself as a sovereign citizen. Deputies engaged the man in conversation for over an hour in an attempt to remove him from the vehicle.

It’s obviously relevant context. This situation wouldn’t exist if he wasn’t a sovidiot.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

ITT: Assholes asking “ironically” for deepfakes.

Yeah I get the sunny references, but the reason you are all thinking the same thing is because y’all acting like Mac. Who to be clear, was a giant PoS for asking the question. It should be a big ass red flag when you emulate the gang.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

Uh huh.

But what’s the joke? Why is it funny? That people are asking for the link? The reason that so many people are making this joke is because they read the headline and wanted to know which site. So they came to the comments, and quoted Mac because his scene is the most well known reference to what they were doing. This isn’t like Dr. Evil, Mac heard about revenge porn and wanted to see, and bunch of dorks heard about deepfakes and “joke” about wanting to see.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

Maybe you enjoy acting puritanical and holier-than-thou

Honestly, right back at yeah. Calling me a prude is just your way of playing dumb about the situation. Your “holier than thou” is “understanding a joke more than thou”.

That they’re making a joke

The joke is that their asking. “Because of the implication” and “one million dollars” are over the top because you’re not holding the world ransom and you aren’t planning to pressure someone into sex. You use those in situation where it doesn’t apply and that’s the humor.

But clicking a link is absolutely within the realm of possibility. Like, read the damn article. Lots of people were using the site/app, people here were asking for the same reason. Whitewashing it through pop culture doesn’t change that they are literally asking for the link.

It’s naive to think that anonymous users on lemmy would somehow never deep fake, nor pursue the content. My comment was to shame those tempted to do so, if you wish to think me unkind for that, so be it.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

As I’ve said so many times, it’s not a joke if you are literally asking. If you are in a boat and tell your GF that she shouldn’t say no to you because of the implication, then that’s not a joke. And if you come to a thread about banned deep fake sites and ask for the link it’s not a joke.Even Dennis himself hides behind this logic that “obviously she is in no danger”, but that ignores the real threats women have to live with every day. Women don’t get to assume that every implication rape threat is a joke because the risk is too great, it always going to be real to the subject without power.

You already admitted in a different comment that some of the people here were looking for a link. So why exactly are you so upset at me? Is your right to assume it’d always a joke out ranked by my concern at yet another way for women to be sexually harassed? Before it was simply any woman who posted nudes online had to know it would be online forever. But now any woman who has ever posted, or hell even went outside where a camera was now runs the risk of her nudes being posted?

But I guess you feeling hurt over “jokes” is the real problem?!? Like seriously, let it tf go. The lame jokes don’t need to be defended and I’m not the jolly joy villian you are making me out to be.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

The scale and ease of use is the real problem. Anyone who would draw pictures of women they know naked to jerk off to is obviously a creep. But that’s a creep who had to spend years of their lives practicing to draw realistic bodies. Not literally any person who happens to have a folder full of their Facebook friends.

Like roll the clock back and pretend this is about the dangers of cars running people over. When there is only a couple cars out there it’s easy to say “But what about the horses that run people over”, but fast forward to today and death by auto wildly outranks death by horse. Horses and car deaths are still a problem, but citing horses as to why car deaths aren’t so bad is ludicrous, disengenerous and asinine

Two things can be a problem, but easily accessible deep faking by anyone with a boner and a spare minute is not the same to someone spending hours over a suacy oil painting.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

😂

Okay, now you are just taking the piss. The show is satire about horrible people doing horrible things. Absolutely everything the gang does should be criticized. I’m pointing at Dennis, not Glen.

Look, I’m done here and idgaf what you think, but I’ll leave you with an idea. Go to a women in your life you trust, mom, GF, sister or whoever and tell them some lady on the internet was upset about deepfakes and you told her it was just a joke.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

“It’s so convenient for both work and home. I have essentially reached a state where the office and my home have become one,” she said.

This is what happens when companies expect you to live and breath for their bottom line.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

Tesla fans have taken issue with the word “recall” in the past when the company has proven adept at fixing its problems through over-the-air software updates. But they likely will have to admit that, in this case, the terminology applies.

Even if Tesla sucks super hard, I agree with these complaints. I immediately checked to see if this was a “real” recall or a software one. Since they all need some physical work on them it definitely applies, but I really wish they used a different term for software update “recalls”. It’s confusing word choice.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

I dont disagree with anything you said, I just think there should be a different, but equally severe term for clarity. It’s not hurting Tesla so much as devaluing the word “recall”. Make it hurt, Tesla is reckless with the way they ship unfinished products, but as I said before, I wasn’t even sure what “recall” meant in this sense.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

One step closer to machine domination.

Like, not even in a joking sense. Ukraine is using a ton of drones, the future of physical warfare will simply be a test resources and production.

I’m honestly not sure if this will be good or bad in the longterm. Absolutely saving any amount of human life is a good thing, but when that is no longer a significant factor, I wonder if we will go to (and stay at) war for more trivial reasons.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

She still is? Being in to link has nothing to do with being ace. She may not have sexual desire or want sexual contact (which are VERY different things) is entirely seperate from the dynamics of a kink relationship.

Anon probably isn’t being malicious, but is definitely uniformed.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

This made me question my sanity for a moment. Apparently I was uninformed about how to spell uninformed.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

Maybe she isn’t explaining very well or maybe he is not believing what she says. At any rate, there is definitely communication problems here that need to be worked out ASAP if this relationship has any hope.

He would be uninformed because its a very obscure situation to be in in the real world.

I’ll admit to being bias, but I have lots of ace friends. Granted I am already part of the queer community and I take your larger point that allo people would have trouble understanding this, but we are less obscure than you might think. There is a lot of shame and stigma around saying “I don’t want to have sex”, most people take it as an invitation to “fix you”.To speak nothing of the boundary trouble allo/ace relationships have. I don’t know you, but I’d bet hard cash money that someone in your life is shades of ace.

inb4_FoundTheVegan, 1 month ago

You only notice the things you notice.

If a trans person walks past you, and you you don’t clock them, do you realize you assumption might be wrong or do you notice nothing and contuine being the textbook definition of confirmation bias?