The Central Bankers of the world will say two things plainly*:
They believe in the "independence of the central bank" from democracy: in absolute, unaccountable, private control the power to design and modify monetary policy
They believe in using this power to advance the ideological agenda that they believe established and maintains US/Western hegemony: namely, upward wealth redistribution resulting in ever-increasing wealth inequality.
Jerome Powell's comments above come within a few weeks of his testimony to Congress that rate hikes (resulting in accelerating inequality) were necessary
You might remember because of his contentious exchange with Elizabeth Warren in defense of layoffs in which he repeatedly defends putting people out of work as the Fed's "only" recourse (assuming a future in which Congress does not alter its approach to taxation)
It was a dishonest defense, because the Fed in its wisdom could have put the onus on Congress, and was choosing instead to dial up middle class misery and increase wealth inequality
Given the Fed has the power to independently and unaccountably fiddle with monetary policy, the Fed has as much power to say "No, we're not going to act, you should fix it on your end" as it does to say "Yes we'll handle that for you"
What it chooses to do is in fact: a choice. If you don't believe it's an ideological choice: you're not understanding why Central Bankers want to remain independent. (It's because they don't want democracy interfering with their agenda, these are their own words)
Zoom's CEO is telling everyone that he wants to invent AI "twins" that you can send to your Zoom meetings on your behalf, which is a startlingly honest assessment of the value of a Zoom meeting
There is a phenomenon where people will see the same vehicle make everywhere once their mind is activated to look for them, i.e. if someone buys a Ford, then they notice all the similar Fords on the road.
I keep seeing a Tesla Cyber Truck in my area. Is it the same one? Or, are they not as rare they they seem to be and there are more wandering?
I would say it has parts that deliver and it doesn't have a lot of parts that get in the way of that delivery. As a whole it doesn't really feel very complete. They literally go to war but it was so expected by everyone that it feels like not much happened
It also just sort of ends in the middle of something
The charges aren't really indicative of the crimes they care about
I mean nevermind the fact that if you're poor you can go to prison for life for shoplifting these days, Al Capone went away for tax evasion.
Not because they sincerely cared about tax evasion, but because Al Capone was responsible for dozens of murders, racketeering, extortion, etcetera, and tax evasion was the charge they could stick
Do they care about business fraud more than they care about inciting an insurrection against the United States of America? Given that it's New York, I sincerely doubt it
Stories of suburban insanity: there is a gentleman who lives a five minute walk from our place. When we moved into the neighborhood, it was one of the first houses we noticed on our walks because of the holiday decorations.
This person drove old corvette stingrays, I believe? As best as I can tell, he’s had at least two, perhaps three in my time here. He regularly wrecks the car because when someone on the road revs their engine at him, he can’t back down from the challenge. (1/x) #Rockville
@wegonnaseeno A lot of these facts in isolation are indistinguishable from incompetence, but the saga as a whole is hard to explain without somebody working hard to keep him on the outside
If you told me you might want a change, then you come to me with research that you did that conveniently supports your change in order to tell me to make the change, and I don't agree with your change, and it's a visual strategy and I'm the resident expert visual strategist AND the resident expert researcher,
then yes I'd be a real fucking idiot not to cross-examine your sources wouldn't I
“One adviser to major Democratic Party donors provided a running list that has been shared with funders of nearly two dozen reasons why Biden could lose, ranging from immigration and high inflation to the president’s age, the unpopularity of Vice President Kamala Harris and the presence of third-party candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.”
This is delusional or a deliberate misrepresentation of why.
@JoBlakely The first list - the delusional one - is messaging guidance that exists specifically to deny and bury the criticisms in the second list. If they weren't aware of the second list, the first list wouldn't exist