yeah

@yeah@feddit.uk

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

yeah,

insert defection/defecation comment here.

yeah,

Except the ban was brought in recently. You can know that it’s not a faith school but not expect a prayer ban to come in. The Equality Objectives of the school state “To promote cultural understanding and awareness of different religious beliefs between different ethnic groups within our school community.”

schoolsweek.co.uk/michaela-says-prayer-ban-restor…

Personally I would not even consider sending a child to the Michaela School as I’ve seen the head on the news so I’m aware of her ethos and iirc Suella Braverman is involved somehow.

yeah,

It’s a portmanteau really - unless this is another American English difference.

yeah,

Woah. I see where you’re coming from with this one but abhorrent behaviours/speech does not mean someone is mentally unwell. Please reach for insults that don’t punch down on another group.

yeah,

It means one should call someone a dickhead with shit posturing and abhorrent morals without saying they need to “be put in a mental asylum”.

The idea that people who act or think in ways that are disgusting or violent are “mentally ill” and not just wrong is a large facet of the stigma attached to being mentally ill.

yeah,

Surprised at the downvotes. Which bit of not attacking a minority while defending a different minority is the problem?

yeah,

I’m hellbent on being a relic. Currently railing against the proliferation of “store”. SHOP ffs. I look forward to everyone going storing.

yeah,

Do your shopping at the shops.

yeah,

It’s a way to call someone extra or superfluous.

yeah,

“Are you in a rental?” That turns up so much that I’m struggling with the proper way. Do you rent? Are you a tenant? Do you have a landlord?

yeah,

Unpaywall bot would be more useful than tldr. Probably.

yeah,

I’d be interested as I reckon it’s cross ages.

Like when the contraceptive pill came in it made it harder for a lot of women to say no to having sex as they couldn’t say they were worried about pregnancy. - so even then women needed a tolerated reason to say no to men.

yeah,

It’s definitely for true stuff. It’s filler but it’s more emphasis than random.

yeah,

they overpaid £5000 “in error” as London Elects didn’t take the bribe?

yeah,

Are you careful with guns?

Do you need to know that the gun is not loaded before treating it as such?

yeah,

Enough. Women are supposed to have a man they trust on hand at all times to check if each man they encounter is safe to respond to freely? A chaperone who knows all these random men on the street who harass? Like it’s all fine because men can recommend a friend.

You don’t comprehend my original point and subsequently you’re not really responding to it. That’s fine, you carry on but I realise you’re either a troll or completely naive or just being obtuse. cba anymore. Have a good day.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • normalnudes
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • tester
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines