HarkMahlberg
HarkMahlberg avatar

HarkMahlberg

@HarkMahlberg@kbin.social

Programmer and Airplane Enthusiast.

"You just don't know how AI works" earns you a block.

Roku has patented a way to show ads over anything you plug into your TV (arstechnica.com)

A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads over any device connected over HDMI, a list that could include cable boxes, game consoles, DVD or Blu-ray players, PCs, or even other video streaming devices. Roku filed for the patent in August 2023 and it was published in November...

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Ever since reading about the challenge of deleting an image from your profile, a GUI for that. It should not only be an API call, not should you have to contact your instance admin to do it. It should be completely self-service from your profile page.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Not even remotely.

HarkMahlberg, (edited )
HarkMahlberg avatar

I think you got the wrong takeaway from that story... The character of God rebukes the dead man for not accepting the practical help of other people. It's just framed as though God sent the rescuers to convince the "believes in miracles" crowd that no such things exist.

Consider a simple rewording: instead of "I sent you two boats and a helicopter" you read "Two boats and a helicopter came to save you." This solves your only hangup and doesn't even change the story. Your beef is with the aesthetic component, not the meaning of the story.

HarkMahlberg, to random
HarkMahlberg avatar

Ace Combat is a war game masquerading as an anti-war game masquerading as a war game.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

But I don't love it any less.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Added toggle for 'Reduced Motion', removing the swirly background and gyrating card motion

Judging by other comments online people seem to love the aesthetic, but I IMMEDIATELY turned off the CRT, scanlines, and screen shaking settings. It was just too much for me. I'm so happy they're letting me take out the last thing that is fucking with my vision after a long play session.

Changed the first shop in every run to always include a normal Buffoon pack as one of the pack options

I think this is a good change too. Might still be a little RNG reliant, but this definitely helps when more often than not, I restart the run after taking a look at the first couple of shops.

Upcoming blinds/tags can now be seen in the shop immediately after defeating a boss blind/cashing out

Also a worthy change.

Changed Fibonacci - costs $8 instead of $7, because Fibonacci

lol

Changed Seance - Now uncommon and $6, was rare and $7

Awww, I'm disappointed that the Magic TCG reference is now a little less on the nose.

Overall there's a LOT of balance changes in here. I'm a little concerned that LocalThunk might have bitten off more than he could chew. Especially given that the blinds' base values have been reduced to make the game easier. Though, is it to make it "easier" or "less RNG heavy?" I guess we'll find out soon enough.

HarkMahlberg, (edited )
HarkMahlberg avatar

Your other comments which are the same comment repeated to everyone. I also don't see any logic, just ragebait.

Blocked by OP, lol

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

So they just have to make good enough games to avoid two complete flops in a row. Which is impossible

BG3 made a lot of committed repeat customers for Larian, I don't think it's impossible their next game will sell very well based on name recognition and good will alone. A guarantee? No. But a safe bet.

It’s the equivalent of the rich billionaires saying if you want a house just work hard and buy one. It’s not hard! Why are the poor people complaining?

If this is the source of your rage posting, that's a lot of misguided anger to point it toward Larian. Are we gonna complain about the one-man developer who quit his job to develop Balatro? Yes he was privileged enough to have savings to dig into, but neither him nor Larian are anywhere in the same ballpark as EA, Microsoft, Ubisoft, etc. They're just the wrong people to get mad at.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Not to stomp all over the author's many good points, but he kinda lost me in the sauce of that "alternate dimension" analogy. I'll admit I thought it was a little too unwieldy. But their last paragraph basically said everything that mattered, emphasis mine.

We would also need to decide to what extent a browser — a user agent — can justifiably act in ways that are not directly in the interests of its user. Protected Audience exists for the benefit of the advertising industry. A system that makes it easier to make websites supported by advertising has benefits. After all, advertising does have the potential to make content more widely accessible to people of different means, with richer people effectively subsidizing content for those of lesser means. A stronger Protected Audience might then provide people with a real, if indirect, benefit. Does that benefit outweigh the costs of giving advertisers greater influence over our decision-making?

With Protected Audience as it is today, we can simply set those questions aside. In failing to achieve its own privacy goals, Protected Audience is not now — and maybe not ever — a good addition to the Web.

If it benefits advertisers, it is fundamentally to the detriment of all others. Regardless of what small gains are made by the tech, if it is FOR advertisers, BY the largest advertiser I can name, then it will continue to erode until we are somewhere between the tracking-infested status quo, and somewhere worse.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Which is still weird.

Alexander Sawchuk, then an assistant professor of electrical engineering at the University of Southern California ... along with a graduate student and the SIPI lab manager, was hurriedly searching the lab for a good image to scan for a colleague's conference paper. ... Just then, somebody happened to walk in with a recent issue of Playboy. The engineers tore away the top third of the centerfold so they could wrap it around the drum of their Muirhead wirephoto scanner...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna

Everything about the story sounds like it was a rush job, a decision made on a whim, after exhausting their existing catalog of test images. And who bring a Playboy mag to their university's computer lab, and advertises their possession? They don't even say who it was, probably to protect them from any embarrassing professional consequences. To me, that's probably the strongest reason to retire it: it's unprofessional.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

In their defense, I am judging the situation given our current day sensibilities, rather than what was considered appropriate at the time. You and @dankm both raise good points. But as our sensibilities change, it ought to be expected that institutions change their own sensibilities to keep up.

I think I'm actually going to miss the discourse around Lena more than the image itself lol. It's the intersection of a lot of different concerns and way too heated for what is ultimately not that big of a deal.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

The unironic blasphemy is off the charts.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

The Problem With Jon Stewart had much more biting commentary, and you could see that he and his writers had much more creative control to speak their mind. The Daily Show just doesn't have the same bite, or the same wit, or the same strength of conviction.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

These aren't facts. You're laundering a broken dog whistle through a couple Wikipedia links. Crawl back into your cave you troglodyte.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Yeah there goes verdantbanana, right on schedule.

Who’s Behind All the ‘Pussy in Bio’ on X? (nymag.com)

Spam is hard. No real platform has solved it completely, and none ever will. Spammers evolve, platforms catch up, spammers evolve again, and so on until the last post is posted and the last user signs out. Individual spam tactics, however, do tend to have short lives, and while PIB won’t be with us forever, it’s notable that...

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

https://www.infoterkiniviral.com/p/contact-us.html

Street : 70945 Roxane Well Suite 870,East Websterton

No state, no country, fake town, fake street, fake account, fake website. Fuck off.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

It's also interesting how much thicker they make the eyebrows for non-Japanese, as well as their facial hair. I suppose they were trying to be accurate (or stylistic) of hairstyles at the time.

HarkMahlberg, to random
HarkMahlberg avatar

Beer before wine ecxept after nine.

@lowqualityfacts

anderseknert, to random
@anderseknert@hachyderm.io avatar

Question: what's the max time that you'd find acceptable for your unit tests to run?

And I'm well aware that there's a bunch of considerations, no right answer, and so on. Just curious to learn what people think.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

@anderseknert I would look at the runtime of my unit tests as a function of the size of the codebase. Unit tests running for 1 hour for a single-page app that plays Solitaire and nothing else? Probably would look into improving that runtime. Unit tests running for 1 hour for a fully featured online banking platform? Maybe that's to be expected, carry on.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Jakey's production value has skyrocketed, just by shooting the rodeo that is NYC. lmao

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • love
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • tester
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines