lone_faerie

@lone_faerie@kbin.social
lone_faerie,

Whether intentional or not, they stole trade secrets. There might not be any legal repercussions of there wasn't intent, but that's incredibly unethical. Especially given Linus is a public investor in a tech startup, he used his platform to trash another startup and then give away their intellectual property.

Newsom spokesperson slams DeSantis debate counteroffer as a ‘joke’ (thehill.com)

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) team slammed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ ® counterproposal for a debate as a “joke” on Saturday, claiming that the Republican presidential candidate’s suggested rules are meant to “hide his insecurity and ineptitude.”

lone_faerie,

A debate is supposed to be about discussing important topics to garner support. If the audience is already full of people who support one side or the other, then they're just there for noise. And we should not be televising a cheering group of Nazis as a reasonable opponent.

lone_faerie,

Friendship ended with the metaverse, now the fediverse is my best friend.

lone_faerie,

@Hypx There's no Moore's Law for batteries because they're a different technology. Transistors today are still fundamentally the same as the first transistor, made in 1947. Batteries, on the other hand, are constantly evolving. The first LiPo battery wasn't invented until 1997, and there are multiple new battery technologies currently being studied, like solid state batteries.

@L4s @Catch42

lone_faerie,

@Hypx Yes transistors are smaller and faster, that's the literal definition of Moore's Law. But a transistor today is a smaller, faster version of the exact same technology as the first transistor, applying a small signal to pass current between doped semiconductor junctions, the only major difference being changing the semiconductor from germanium to silicon.
Batteries, however, are fundamentally different from when they were first invented. Yes, it's still storing electrical energy as chemical energy, but the chemistry has changed so much since the first batteries. The word "polymer" wouldn't even exist for another 20 odd years. And new technology is constantly being discovered, such as solid state batteries or supercapacitors.
And if you want to talk about physical limits, Moore's Law is essentially dead. We're nearing a point where you'd have to split atoms to make a smaller transistor. Batteries are limited by their chemical makeup, transistors are limited by the laws of physics.

@L4s @Catch42

lone_faerie,

Precisely. Technology advances based on the needs at the time. In the mid twentieth century, the booming computer industry necessitated a smaller, cheaper switching device than a vacuum tube, which led to the invention of today's transistor. Similarly, with the growing electric vehicle industry, we're needing to find smaller and cheaper batteries. And @Hypx
3 is right, we are near the physical limits of today's battery technology, just like we had reached the limits of vacuum tubes, which just pushes innovation further to find an alternative. Before 1947 there was no Moore's Law because transistors didn't exist. Who knows what'll happen with batteries by 2047, we could end up with Hobobvision's Law.

lone_faerie,

Calling them BEVs is misleading and damaging to EVs as a whole, because you're right, batteries do have their limitations, at least today's batteries. The proper industry term is FEV, fully electric vehicle. Choosing to limit EVs to only batteries is an arbitrary decision made for argument's sake, but instead of looking at how they can be improved, you're just focusing on why it'll fail. A "battery" is anything that stores energy, not just the traditional battery, and once EVs are the norm, they probably won't be using LiPos, they'll be using something that hasn't been invented yet.

lone_faerie,

Driving with something that power dense is incredibly dangerous. You're literally driving a bomb, dynamite is 4.6 MJ/kg

lone_faerie,

I'm definitely staying here, but there are a few niche communities that only exist on Reddit that I'll probably go back to, just not nearly as frequently.

lone_faerie,

Do you think Starbucks is selling dildos? We're talking about rainbow coffee cups. I'd like to see a coffee cup that paints an entire group of people as "hypersexual fetishist nymphomaniacs"

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines