wahming

@wahming@kbin.social
wahming,

Not really. When I read that title, my first thought was twitter had implemented some sort of paid tier. It was arguably misleading

wahming,

im saying I disapear to them

This approach is incredibly open to abuse. Reddit implemented this to a lesser degree and abuse already started happening. By blocking everybody who disagrees with you, you can start threads that are only visible to lurkers and your supporters, creating a warped perception of public opinion and false consensus.

wahming,

Based on feedback so far, it only seems to work for random users. Definitely doesn't work for me on kbin

wahming,

I want the ability to cut bs out of my stuff

What are you talking about? Nobody's disputing that. You seem to have lost the thread of the conversation, which is about preventing people you've blocked from seeing your posts. At that point you're not cutting BS out of your stuff, but other people's.

What was the subreddit that represented to you the best example of downspiral of quality? To me it was /r/dataisbeautiful

At first it was all about presenting data in an original looking way. In the end it was about pushing political ideas in your throat using a plain bar graph. It was not about sharing something interesting you found but about taking advantage of a captive audience.

wahming,

nobody can respect that others are allowed to have different opinions.

It's the paradox of tolerance social contract. I will respect their right to an opinion as long as they uphold that contract. Unfortunately, many don't.

wahming,
  1. It's a Wikipedia link away, it doesn't require a PhD to read and understand. Why are you assuming I need to study it to know what it is?

  2. Would you like to state your views? Because it certainly sounds like you have some that are pent up inside.

wahming,

Against the storm has piqued my interest, combining my two fav genres of citybuilding and roguelites. Anybody have any opinion on it?

wahming,

Or just implement a toggle option so we can customise what we see

wahming,

Can confirm the domain block doesn't work for me, I'm seeing way too much yiff in my feed.

wahming,

Do share the alternative with us, that's universally supported and not owned by a corporation.

wahming,

Are you sure? I'm not seeing anything else in this thread under your profile

wahming,

Yeah it's not showing up for whatever reason. Anyway, your reply boiled down to 'Something that doesn't exist yet'. It's probably a good idea to get the replacement tech up and running, and work out the kinks, before cheering for the death of our workhorse communication method.

First misinformation susceptibility test finds 'very online' Gen Z and millennials are most vulnerable to fake news (phys.org)

Researchers want the public to test themselves: https://yourmist.streamlit.app/. Selecting true or false against 20 headlines gives the user a set of scores and a "resilience" ranking that compares them to the wider U.S. population. It takes less than two minutes to complete.

wahming,

I read in one of the kbin discussion threads recently that PMs are a feature in progress, currently low-priority due to the Reddit migration.

wahming,

solidly 50% of you look the same.

Let me inflate that statistic a little, as somebody without a profile pic who looks exactly like that

wahming,

Look into the health complications of the procedure then decide for yourself

wahming,

Just realised your hypothesis doesn't work, as many of the posts I see ending up in m/random have 0 comments, thus there is no way they could have been referred to by a comment/reply before they were federated.

wahming,

@ernest any chance you could shed some light on this?

wahming,

I gave up on NatGeo when they started focusing on schlocky pseudoscientific garbage shows. Such a shame

wahming,

If you look at my follow up comment, I think I said pretty much the same thing you did. Though you said it better, for obvious reasons.

banning and defederating communities

Hey all, I recently left reddit like many of you. I have a question regarding lemmy and the fediverse on the history of banning and defederation. I have noticed several posts calling for varying communities to be disconnected. were these removal requests as prevalent before the mass migration? Usually I am all for communities...

wahming,

Satire doesn't work as well on fedi when everybody has to check what instance they're on AND what instance you're posting from to figure out if you're serious

wahming,

Is kbin a community, or a platform for communities to run on?

Both, that distinction doesn't work very well for the new fediverse model.

wahming,

I have to say that there's a level of irony in asking for bans and central controls on content on a platform that in its very nature decentralized and supposed to be empowering.

There isn't any irony. That's the whole point of the decentralization - it empowers everybody to be part of the communities they wish to be in, and not participate in those they disagree with. We have the power to leave any instance where we disagree with the admins and move to a new one.

wahming,

Or maybe there are already instances out there that don't defederate and leave it up to the individual?

It only takes one to defederate. Any large instances that stay neutral will eventually be defederated with by other instances, as per the beehaw example recently. So your best option would indeed be to host your own small instance.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • modclub
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines