lolcatnip,

Battlefield Earth. The movie is awful but it’s a much smaller time commitment than the book.

hanrahan,
@hanrahan@slrpnk.net avatar

Dine. The book is terrible, I couldn’t read it at all after trying twice… way back decades ago, the recent movie was good.

saigot,

The classic would be fight club, I think even the author has said they enjoyed some of the symbolism that was added.

Species8472,
@Species8472@lemmy.world avatar

The Da Vinci Code. The film and book were both utter, contemptible garbage.

BigBananaDealer,
@BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee avatar

maybe shrek? i never cared for the book though its not bad

ulkesh,
@ulkesh@beehaw.org avatar

My spouse says “Stardust” the book is nowhere near as good as “Stardust” the movie. We both love the movie, but it’s surprising the book wasn’t nearly as good.

Railison,

Haven’t read the book, but watched a guy discuss the differences between The Devil Wears Prada and the movie.

His contention was that there were absolutely no redeeming traits about Miranda in the book and she had somehow failed upwards with no true talent. Andy the protagonist spends the whole time rebelling against the magazine and its people.

In the movie we see Miranda to be a horrid person but we see that overlays a keen eye and talent that has led her to the top. Moreover, Andy spends effort to fit in with the magazine people and she evolves as a character.

tetris11,
@tetris11@lemmy.ml avatar

That’s a good example. A filmmaker saw a 2D character and added a layer to save the story

Bilbo_Haggins,

Jaws doesn’t quite fit the prompt but although it’s a good movie, the book is essentially a sub-par beach read. And there was no USS Indianapolis monologue in the book.

CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn,

The Mission, though I haven’t seen the movie yet.

vivamatapacos,
@vivamatapacos@hexbear.net avatar

Starship Troopers.

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA,
@LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net avatar

The movie is good though

5in1k,

I’m doing my part!

vivamatapacos,
@vivamatapacos@hexbear.net avatar

Damn, I missed the (which was already bad) caveat in the title. Yes, the film is great.

SSJ2Marx,
@SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net avatar

I do wonder how many people got hoodwinked by the film and then went to read the book only to be hit with an entire textbook of lectures from a libertarian.

Silentiea,

That’s okay. Did you know it has sequels?

Marin_Rider,

they were terrible. I didn’t mind one of the animated ones though

SkaveRat,

Great. Now a want to spread managed democracy some more

Rinna,
@Rinna@lemm.ee avatar

Howl’s Moving Castle. Not that I didn’t enjoy the book, I just preferred the movie more.

tetris11,
@tetris11@lemmy.ml avatar

Same. I remember the book being actually kind of unimpressive and wondering “Really, this is what inspired that amazing movie?”

bleepbloopbop,

I’m guessing someone with enough familiarity could say this about one of the John Green books’ movie adaptations, but I haven’t seen any (?) of the movies and haven’t read the books since I was a teen so shrug-outta-hecks

MxRemy,

This is a show and not a movie, but definitely The Magicians. The show is pretty incredible, and more or less abandons everything wrong with the original. The books mostly spend way too many pages following all the MC’s petty grievances, and he’s like a massive incel.

shuzuko,

Oh, interesting! I may have to give the series a shot, then - I pretty much hate-read the books, hoping at first that he would get better and then later hoping that someone would just fucking kill him lol

twice_twotimes,

Quentin is an incredible character in the show. Infuriating at times, immature, whiny, selfish, but in ways that are relatable. Everyone is immature, whiny, and selfish to some degree. Quentin’s story in the show is about getting out of his own fucking head and finding health and happiness in feeling connected to other people. His story as the MC is explicitly about him appreciating that he is not in fact the main character, and that’s a good thing.

Corollary of that is that the show ends up being a truly ensemble cast story, which is really refreshing. Plus Eliot and Margo are perfection.

MxRemy,

Yessss, that’s exactly how I felt! I only even forced myself to finish it so I’d feel qualified to write a terrible review lol

MrBobs,

Fight Club, book is decent but the film seems a more complete package.

ghost_of_faso2,
@ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml avatar
Silentiea,

…is Chuck Palahniuk the director of the Truman Show? The show?

ghost_of_faso2,
@ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml avatar

Chuck Palahniuk

Not that im aware of, he wrote the fight club book and then sold the rights too it, this is him criticising David Finchers adaption and saying the Chinese censor of it is actually closer to the orginal book lol.

Silentiea,

There was a picture of him in the link you shared, he looks almost exactly like the director guy in that movie. Wouldn’t be surprised if he was the model they based it on

JimVanDeventer,

There is a Fight Club 2 in the form of a graphic novel. I normally don’t believe a shitty sequel can ruin my opinion of a movie I enjoy, but this one really put that to the test, boy howdy.

Rusty,

Even Chuck Palahniuk agrees.

Now that I see the movie, especially when I sat down with Jim Uhls and record a commentary track for the DVD, I was sort of embarrassed of the book, because the movie had streamlined the plot and made it so much more effective and made connections that I had never thought to make.

Source: www.dvdtalk.com/interviews/chuck_palahniuk.html

axont,

The film’s problem was casting Brad Pitt as Durden and changing the ending so that he’s successful. The movie made him attractice and charismatic. The book makes it clear the narrator is completely unhinged and fixated on his hatred of women and femininity.

The book is very clearly a story about straight men not being ok. “straight guys would rather punch each other naked Ina basement instead of go to therapy.” The movie doesn’t translate that well, so it reads more like a criticism of 90s work culture. Which is fair, but it often misses what Palahniuk intended.

To also be fair though Palahniuk seems to like the movie, but really despises young straight men admiring Durden as some antihero. He elaborates that feeling in the comic sequels.

FungiDebord,
@FungiDebord@hexbear.net avatar

Ya the movie bangs

absGeekNZ,
@absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz avatar

The lord of the rings!

I love reading…I read a lot. But Tolkien’s style just never worked for me, the movies were great.

owenfromcanada,
@owenfromcanada@lemmy.world avatar

I like Tolkien’s style, but I get it. If you’re not prepared to hear everything described in excruciating detail, maybe just stick with the Hobbit.

absGeekNZ,
@absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz avatar

The Hobbit was pretty good. It’s been a long time since I read it.

saigot,

I liked most of the books, but I hate the long songs. Maybe this is a hot take but authors should not put in songs longer than a few lines.

absGeekNZ,
@absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz avatar

I always skip a song that is more than a few (max 5) lines long

daltotron,

Yeah no I hate songs in books. Most of the time it’s pretty hard to figure out what the actual tune of the song is supposed to be sung like, unless the author’s pretty good at it, and most aren’t.

Marin_Rider,

I remember hearing that tolkien when reading the songs aloud never sang them, so noone really knows what they should sound like

hanrahan,
@hanrahan@slrpnk.net avatar

I agree with thus, I tried the books and got pages in before abandoning them, the movies are well done

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.ml
  • Durango
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • PowerRangers
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • tsrsr
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • magazineikmin
  • normalnudes
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • vwfavf
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • All magazines