Nonilex, (edited ) to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

New: returns to the witness stand Monday to kick off ’s defense case in the ’s trial, per sources.

While there is a list of 128 possible Trump witnesses, we haven’t heard anything definitive re the actual people they will call or in what order.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

attorney Chris argued to NY Supreme Court Justice Arthur , that regardless of what was in Trump's statements, they did not make a material difference to bankers who approved to Trump.

Kise says there was no testimony presented at trial by anyone at Trump or other lenders that said they would have proceeded differently had they known Trump's accurate financial condition.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: “Ultimately what matters is the decision-making process of the bank, & if it would have made a difference to them,"

Kise said the considered many factors when deciding whether to lend to , including the nature of the collateral, the quality of the collateral, Trump's experience & performance in the industry, his liquidity & other factors.

(All of which were misrepresented; & the banks’ decision is not the issue. The issue is the & Trump’s . Not the banks’.)

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

started by arguing the standard of proof on the 6 claims at issue requires "clear & convincing evidence," which he says the didn’t provide.

Kise: “The attorney general has converted standard commercial real estate loan transactions into fraud not based on what the bank says but what she says.”

( was already decided, as a matter-of-, before this trial.)

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

attacked the credibility of key witness & fmr attorney :

"I think he's lied in every court or forum that he's ever appeared in.”

Then referring to Trump, Kise stated:
"This is not someone who speaks in code.”

Engoron: “I think the 'perfect' call with Zelenskyy about the military aid might have been code.”
(Hmm, not appropriate)

Kise said that's a matter & shouldn't be a factor here.
(I actually agree w/Kise)

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Thankfully, Justice agreed w/ as well & said he's only going to base his on what's in front of him, meaning the presented in this .

atty moved on to (the is seeking $250M in purportedly ill-gotten gains from Trump et al).

Kise: “There's no demonstration of a [connection] between the purported ill-gotten gains & the defendants' (conduct).”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

argued any transaction before July 2014 cannot form the basis for any of the 's claims, since they're outside of the statute of limitations.

Kise also argued that subsequent certifications by et al regarding compliance w/the terms of loans from that time cannot be used to support the allegations either.

(re SOL, Trump attys may be banking on the appeals court stay, but that wasn’t based on SOL, but procedural & still undecided.)

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

I skipped an interesting bit from ’s presentation; he argued that would qualify in "any court in this country" as an expert on real estate, & then displayed a slide that said:

"The Court stated it is 'not here to hear what [President Trump] has to say!'

This is a word for word duplicate of a Trump social media post.

They’re not even trying to dress up their arguments for court at this point. It’s all for the court of public opinion & Trump. Disgraceful really.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

interrupted & asked if he actually heard what the judge had said.

The supplied the answer, that Engoron said he's here to hear answer questions.

Engoron called that entire portion of Kise's presentation “misleading!" It was intended to be. Just as it was when Trump posted it.

I reposted but here are links

Trump’s post:
https://masto.ai/@Nonilex/111365740541183885

What was actually said in court:
https://masto.ai/@Nonilex/111364764092476545

Nonilex, (edited )
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Didn’t finish the thread, cuz, stuff, here’s the rest:

concluded by reiterating claim that there was no proof the loans would not have been made if the had different (accurate) info or that the terms would have been different.

(Moot. See earlier in thread)

"This is what happens in the real world, not the world of make believe, not the attorney general's world," Kise says

/ just a speech talking point.

Nonilex, to business
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#Now it’s #Ivanka Trump’s turn to face questioning in the #civil #fraud #trial that is publicly probing into the family business. #Trump’s eldest daughter, who has been in his inner circle in both #business & #politics, is due on the stand Wed, after trying unsuccessfully to block her #testimony.

#EricTrump #DonaldTrumpJr #NYAG #LetitiaJames
https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-lawsuit-trial-ivanka-trump-testimony-1795382ea1d2c33faefbb40a0907feca

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: "Were you aware that in his statements of financial condition for 2011, Donald Trump represented that his net worth was more than $4 billion?"

: “No”

atty Chris said that all of this questioning is outside the scope of the that compelled Ivanka to testify:

"This individual was subpoenaed on behalf of three corp entities, & none of those entities have anything to do w/(the Doral loan).”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Justice responded that he didn’t think that mattered.

: “We haven't had any questions about those corporate entities.”

Engoron considered it further & said: “It's an interesting question; to what extent the question has to be limited to the grounds of the subpoena?"

attorney : "She's no longer a defendant in this case.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

got a break while attys argued SOL to.

: "For me, the reasons for all the rulings on statute of limitations from pre-2014 & 2016 deals...these deals, at least some of them, were required for updated financials, year after year.… It doesn't make sense to talk about the follow up documentation w/o [referencing] the original loan.”

atty : "Nothing that was done by way of certification (affects) a decision that was made years before the statute of limitations expired.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: "While there is some contextual latitude...we're asking about things that are well-barred.”

: “I agree w/your logic that a certification in 2016 doesn't affect anything about original loan, however (some loans) require as a condition of a loan the or whoever…certify things in the future. I believe those certifications are at issue."

retook the stand.

Engoron to Ivanka: “Sorry to have kept you in the dark.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

showed an email from to on June 17, 2013:
"You can get better pricing for such LTV. Nativixis will give you 140MM at that rate most likely. Show i show it to them?" (sic) (=Loan to Value)

NYAG asked why she showed such info to ,

objected on spousal privilege grounds.

decided that was a good time for a lunch break

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

atty accused Judge of using "two sets of standards."

Solomon countered that it's "night-&-day different" because the state used Trump's communications w/the GSA, not the agency's internal docs.

Engoron to Kise:
"Your constant insinuations that I have different set of standards. It's just not true. …You can keep saying it if it makes you happy, that I'm favoring one side over the other. …I just make the rulings as I see them."

Nonilex, to anime_titties
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Today at the #NewYork Supreme Court in Manhattan, it is an historic day. Donald #Trump is slated to #testify in the #NYAG’s case against him, the #TrumpOrganization, & its execs alleging he #defrauded #banks, #insurers & the #government for decades by lying about his #NetWorth.

The last time testified at a trial was in 2013 per @AP
#TrumpTrial #legal #law #civil #conspiracy #fraud
https://apnews.com/article/trump-new-york-fraud-lawsuit-business-empire-bd06bf8db3a14a9d2f10eb69b300c1d3

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: "I'm between IBM & Tiffany."

Trump: "It's a holdup. It's not a nice word. It's a holdup site." If either Tiffany or IBM wanted to expand, they’d have to buy his bldg.

: “The question was...”

Trump, spoke over the AG: “I bought the air rights over Tiffany so they can’t go up…”

: “Excuse me”

Trump dismissively: “Hold on!” (& cont’d)

Engoron: “Mr. , can you control your witness? I am considering drawing a negative inference on any question he might be asked.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

urged the judge against that.

asked about 40 Wall Street (Trump Tower) & its valuation at $550.1M on the 2014 SFC. gave a speech about the statute of limitations, possibly converting it to condominiums, & how developing condos for that property "was perfect."

Trump: "I got a lollipop in the lease. It's a legal term, believe it or not." (So now he knows the law? I thought he didn’t even know what a subpoena was)

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: "I beseech you to control him, if you can,” he warned he will control if the lawyers don’t.

& jumped up to defend Trump, calling his answers “responsive”.

Habba said Engoron's here to "hear what he has to say.”

Engoron: "I'm not here to hear what he has to say. HE’s here to ANSWER questions!"
He ordered them to sit down.
Kise said the judge should want to hear EVERYTHING Trump has to say.

Engoron: “No I do not want to hear ‘everything’ this witness has to say.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Apparently it looked like was l going to start another tangent because, said: “ I think we'll take our break now," & said he'd appreciate it if would talk w/his client.

At one point, said he would excuse the witness if he didn't respond to the questions he was asked.

After the break:

NYAG asked Trump about valuations of his New York penthouse in 2014, which inaccurately tripled its size.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Justice tells the that he's following his lead, & if he wants to let the witness "ramble" on w/ "unresponsive" answers, he'll do that.

defends what he describes as Trump's "brilliant" response.

: “I have a lot of money, a lot more money than you thought."

Trump goes on to say that since his financial statements have disclaimer clauses, telling parties to do their own due diligence, there can be no . He’s totally off topic.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

showed a 2015 article.

Trump scoffed: "Forbes. They're owned by China. Now, they sold to Russia."

The article says that was very much involved in inflating his ,

Trump: “I have very little respect for Forbes."
(Forbes broke the news that Trump inflated the size of his apt & recently knocked him off the billionaires list.)

The article cited a recorded conversation at the time. Trump atty objected & called the recording inaudible. agreed re quality.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

made his usual statute of limitations objection on a term loan agreement from late 2012, which Judge overruled - Trump smiled at the ruling.

When it was entered into evidence, Trump shook his head.

: “The number[s] of my net worth are substantially more than reflected in my financial statements, so therefore you have no case. I think this case is a disgrace

(Trump campaigning from the stand)

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

made clear that the motion would be in part about Justice Engoron's principal .

: "Don't file that motion, please. I think it's important for the safety of my staff. I am 1,000% convinced, & you don't have any right or reason to complain about my confidential communication."

: “There's no way to file that motion without referencing the subject matter.”

Engoron: “I'm directing you not to make that motion [...] I'm going to protect my staff, okay."

crooksandliars, to random
@crooksandliars@crooklyn.social avatar
Nonilex, to legal
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

& Fri, Nov 3, 2023, AM session;

The day began w/ yesterday’s drama. Trump attys accused Supreme Court Justice Arthur 's , , of bias, & the asserted she influences the judge.

Yesterday, Engoron warned Trump atty not to speak about court staff, & noted a pattern of in Kise’s behavior toward women in the courtroom.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

“Thus, for the reasons stated herein, I hereby order that all are prohibited from making any public statements, in or out of court, that refer to any confidential communications, in any form, between my staff & me.

“Failure to abide by this directive shall result in serious .”

.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines