openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

This week we held an online briefing about our report, 'Prevent and the Pre-Crime State: How unaccountable data sharing is harming a generation.'

Hear more about the UK Prevent programme and its dangers from Sara Chitseko (ORG), Dr Layla Aitlhadj (PreventWatch), Ilyas Nagdee (Amnesty International UK and Professor Charlotte Heath-Kelly (The University of Warwick).

Watch now 📺

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFWM72ddZGQ

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Our report shows that once referred to Prevent:

🔴 Data could be shared without consent.

🔴 Right to erasure disregarded.

🔴 Right to object or change data made too onerous, often requiring legal action at personal expense.

🔴 Data can be retained and shared for at least 6 years.

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The processing of personal data under Prevent is neither proportionate nor necessary when the majority of referrals end with no action.

There’s especially no valid policing purpose when no criminal activity is involved.

Yet the UK government is redoubling its support for Prevent.

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

How data is managed and stored under the UK Prevent programme lacks transparency.

Organisations fall back on national security or law enforcement data protection exemptions.

This makes it very difficult for people to access their records and to request that data is removed.

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

⚠️ Prevent turns safeguarding into surveillance ⚠️

Institutions subject to the Prevent duty MUST ensure maximum transparency around referrals, data processing and data sharing.

Tell your Council (UK) to act on the concerns raised in our report.

ACT NOW ⬇️

https://action.openrightsgroup.org/ask-your-councillor-take-action-prevent-and-pre-crime-state

openrightsgroup, to humanrights
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

🚨 Prevent is a UK surveillance export 🚨

Under the pretense of safeguarding, the programme harvests and retains people's data, mostly children, even when no action is taken.

We need to stop Prevent before it becomes a global problem.

Read this new report by Rights and Security International: "The UK is helping Indonesia violate freedom of religion, risks complicity in torture and disappearances." ⬇️

https://www.rightsandsecurity.org/action/research/exporting-prevent-the-uk-governments-complicity-in-rights-violating-counter-extremism-programmes-in-indonesia

openrightsgroup, to FreeSpeech
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Freedom of expression knows new bounds under the UK government’s imprecise redefinition of extremism.

By ministerial decree, civil society groups will be shunned from the corridors of power, blocked from funding and dissent silenced.

Read our latest blog ⬇️

#freedomofexpression #freespeech #Prevent #extremism #ukpolitics

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/extremism-redefined-caught-in-a-mouth-trap/

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

"The lack of right of reply for groups that fall under the new definition [of extremism] shows the UK government is using it for political point scoring and playing to the populist gallery, rather than any meaningful attempt to protect public safety."

🗣️ Sara Chitseko, ORG Programme Manager.

#freedomofexpression #freespeech #Prevent #extremism #ukpolitics

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

As the new extremism definition hasn't been introduced through UK legislation and Parliamentary scrutiny, there's room for confusion over its application by public bodies.

This may result in even more people being swept under the Prevent programme for surveillance and data misuse.

#freedomofexpression #freespeech #Prevent #extremism #ukpolitics

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The redefinition of extremism adds to the authoritarian lurch of recent years in the UK, as seen in restrictions on the right to protest, sweeping new police powers and the censorship of online expression.

We're left asking whose free speech is protected and who must keep quiet under the threat of being labelled an extremist?

#freedomofexpression #freespeech #Prevent #extremism #ukpolitics

openrightsgroup, to FreeSpeech
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Children who are referred to Prevent for wearing pro-Palestinian badges could be impacted for the rest of their lives.

Their data will be retained on the Prevent database for at least 6 years and up to 100, even if their case requires no further action.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/palestine-gaza-palestine-solidarity-campaign-bournemouth-government-b2523588.html

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Children referred to Prevent will have their referral shared with children’s services and this data kept for 25 years after their 18th birthday.

So it'll still be available when they're an adult and may impact any future assessment concerning their own children and any children’s services interventions.

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The data of people referred to Prevent, including children, could be shared with airports, ports and immigration services, which could result in them being stopped under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act.

Read our report on how unaccountable data sharing under Prevent is harming a generation for more ⬇️

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/publications/prevent-and-the-pre-crime-state-how-unaccountable-data-sharing-is-harming-a-generation/

openrightsgroup, to FreeSpeech
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The UK government has updated the definition of extremism without any opportunity for scrutiny.

Instead of recognising that the call is coming from inside the house when it comes to extreme views, they take aim at our democratic freedoms.

ORG's response ⬇️

#freedomofexpression #freespeech #extremism #ukpolitics #Prevent #censorship

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/extremism-guidance-attacks-freedom-of-expression/

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

ORG is concerned about reports that the organisations who will fall foul of this new definition od extremism appear to be ones advocating for the rights of Muslims.

Yet just this week, the UK Tory Party has shown willingness to accept money from a donor who made racist, misogynist comments about a fellow MP.

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The new guidance (UK) says that the new definition replaces the 2011 Prevent definition.

But it's unclear whether this will be adopted by authorities with duties under the Prevent programme.

This lack of clarity could see even more people being referred to the flawed Prevent programme.

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Our recent report shows that the majority of Prevent referees (UK) don't meet the threshold for deradicalisation, but data can be retained for years even when their case is marked ‘no further action’.

The more people whose data is hoarded, the worse it'll get.

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/new-report-reveals-widespread-data-sharing-and-retention-of-prevent-referrals-including-childrens-data/

openrightsgroup,
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The fact that this is non-statutory guidance means that the public are denied parliamentary scrutiny of changes that will impact freedom of expression and political engagement in the UK.

The new definition of extremism is an undemocratic attack on our rights for political point-scoring.

openrightsgroup, to UKpolitics
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Data from Prevent referrals is held for at least 6 years on the chance of re-offending, despite the distinct lack of a crime.

Based on racialised presumptions, Prevent is filled with false positive results to determine supposedly would-be terrorists.

➡️ https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/new-report-reveals-widespread-data-sharing-and-retention-of-prevent-referrals-including-childrens-data/

#Prevent #PreventDuty #Surveillance #PreCrime #Policing #DataProtection #ukpolitics

openrightsgroup, to UKpolitics
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

“Despite the lack of utility to state security, [Prevent] referrals – and their storage, retention and sharing – can have disruptive and lasting impacts on individuals, including children as young as 6-years-old.”

🗣️ Sophia Akram on ORG's recent report.

#Prevent #PreventDuty #Surveillance #PreCrime #Policing #DataProtection #ukpolitics

https://www.digit.fyi/is-the-uks-prevent-data-retention-programme-illegal/

openrightsgroup, to UKpolitics
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

"The prospect that people’s data could be held from when they were a child for the duration of their lifetime is disproportionate."

Our report shows data is retained despite the lack of any offence or the need for intervention, with the majority of people referred being under 17.

🗣️ Sophia Akram for ORG.

#Prevent #PreventDuty #Surveillance #PreCrime #Policing #DataProtection #ukpolitics

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uk-prevent-data-children-referred-could-be-held-their-entire-lives

openrightsgroup, to UKpolitics
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

If you’re referred to Prevent, your data rights are made difficult to enforce.

The right to erasure is weakened by a lack of transparency about data sharing between multiple databases and national security exemptions used by counter-terrorism police.

➡️ https://www.openrightsgroup.org/publications/prevent-and-the-pre-crime-state-how-unaccountable-data-sharing-is-harming-a-generation/

#Prevent #PreventDuty #Surveillance #PreCrime #Policing #DataProtection #ukpolitics

PSA: Docker nukes your firewall rules and replaces them with its own.

I use nftables to set my firewall rules. I typically manually configure the rules myself. Recently, I just happened to dump the ruleset, and, much to my surprise, my config was gone, and it was replaced with an enourmous amount of extremely cryptic firewall rules. After a quick examination of the rules, I found that it was...

N0x0n, to selfhosted in PSA: Docker nukes your firewall rules and replaces them with its own.

Option to disable this behavior would be 100x better then current, but what do I know lol

Prevent docker from manipulating iptables

Don’t know what it’s actually doing, I’m just learning how to work with nftables, but I saved that link in case oneday I want to manage the iptables rules myself :)

N0x0n, to selfhosted in PSA: Docker nukes your firewall rules and replaces them with its own.

You can somehow change that behavior: Prevent docker from manipulating iptables

aral, to uk
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Do you think all people deserve a level of life that affords them human dignity? Are you not a fan of fascists? According to the UK government, you could be…

A TERRORIST!!!

https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup/112060191875794716

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Leos
  • kavyap
  • cisconetworking
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • PowerRangers
  • Durango
  • everett
  • rosin
  • anitta
  • vwfavf
  • modclub
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • ngwrru68w68
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • tester
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • All magazines