Replies

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ajsadauskas, (edited ) to tech
@ajsadauskas@aus.social avatar

In an age of LLMs, is it time to reconsider human-edited web directories?

Back in the early-to-mid '90s, one of the main ways of finding anything on the web was to browse through a web directory.

These directories generally had a list of categories on their front page. News/Sport/Entertainment/Arts/Technology/Fashion/etc.

Each of those categories had subcategories, and sub-subcategories that you clicked through until you got to a list of websites. These lists were maintained by actual humans.

Typically, these directories also had a limited web search that would crawl through the pages of websites listed in the directory.

Lycos, Excite, and of course Yahoo all offered web directories of this sort.

(EDIT: I initially also mentioned AltaVista. It did offer a web directory by the late '90s, but this was something it tacked on much later.)

By the late '90s, the standard narrative goes, the web got too big to index websites manually.

Google promised the world its algorithms would weed out the spam automatically.

And for a time, it worked.

But then SEO and SEM became a multi-billion-dollar industry. The spambots proliferated. Google itself began promoting its own content and advertisers above search results.

And now with LLMs, the industrial-scale spamming of the web is likely to grow exponentially.

My question is, if a lot of the web is turning to crap, do we even want to search the entire web anymore?

Do we really want to search every single website on the web?

Or just those that aren't filled with LLM-generated SEO spam?

Or just those that don't feature 200 tracking scripts, and passive-aggressive privacy warnings, and paywalls, and popovers, and newsletters, and increasingly obnoxious banner ads, and dark patterns to prevent you cancelling your "free trial" subscription?

At some point, does it become more desirable to go back to search engines that only crawl pages on human-curated lists of trustworthy, quality websites?

And is it time to begin considering what a modern version of those early web directories might look like?

@degoogle

photonic_sorcerer,
@photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

What’s to say we won’t have AI-curated lists and directories? That way we don’t have to deal with link rot and the like. I think the issue is the algorithms used for search. We need better ones, better AI, not more frivolous human labor.

smalllebowsky, to dach German
@smalllebowsky@troet.cafe avatar

Es ist Mittwoch 🍄 meine Kerle

@dach

photonic_sorcerer,
@photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Wo gehts nun lang?

Gute Frage…

smalllebowsky, to dach German
@smalllebowsky@troet.cafe avatar

Es ist Müdwoch 😴 meine müden Kerle
Dieser Moment wenn man sehr viel zu tun hat. Alles aufeinmal

@dach #zeichnen #frosch #mittwoch

photonic_sorcerer,
@photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Mir geht’s ähnlich. Dennoch ist der Tag immer ein wenig besser, wenn ich zu einem SmallLebowsky aufwachen darf!

gm_india, to nostupidquestions

@nostupidquestions - Can I post from mastodon to lemmy ⁉️

photonic_sorcerer,
@photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Yup!

Source: this post

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines