A feeder that opens when they stand on a big paddle.
Chickens do not like mechanical things that move.
It's funny to watch, one puts a foot on slowly, watches it lift. Then steps up and eats. Then the rest arrive and pecking ensues (other chickens heads, pellets in the machine).
Can't video it, they all rush over to the fence when anyone is in sight.
Remember in the movie BLADE RUNNER when Deckard keeps zooming into the photo and goes around a corner? I remember thinking "that's too much of a credibility reach." Oh well!
So, given the recent announcements by 'Mastodon' HQ, it seems like a forgeone conclusion that every posts ever made on the Fediverse will be used at some point as AI fodder.
If you have an account on mastodon.social, you should consider migrating to another server ASAP.
If you have an account on any other server, now is a good time to check the settings of your account through the web interface and make sure the option "Opt-out of search engine indexing" is checked.
I think I may have a Voyager problem. It's at the point where all it takes is an offhand reference or small question, and I come around two hours later and there's 18 pages of text that I've apparently written.
The hams are doing their morning fighting on the radio again.
"Wahhh, how come no one talks to me? ...
You're a piece of shit, Jimmy. When you look up sack of shit in the dictionary, there's a picture of you. You're ugly, worthless, you're just a sack of shit, Jimmy."
"At least he tries to be good though. Pat is a piece of shit, but he's not good at it. Jimmy really tries to be good at being a piece of shit."
If you followed me for weird Voyager computer system facts, there will be none today :( No time, and it's looking increasingly likely that, to get the goods proper, I'll need to talk to the JPL archives and see how they might feel about getting a bunch of schematics from the Viking and Voyager collections cleared for publication. Which is going to require more homework to figure out what I need. And, frankly, "clearing for publication" doesn't sound like something quick and painless either.
Maybe the Computer Museum folk could help out. Maybe they have some partial docs or something. They may have sufficient institutional mass to back you.
I think part of the problem is the class of people who can pull off a coop aren't hungry enough to maintain a coop; if you have the buy-in (class portability, marketable skills etc) if things get tough even momentarily people can and do just bail. But market and legal forces literally work against you. Push and pull. People who are hungry enough get undermined and put back in their place.
Look at the shit the basque had/have to push through. Narrow circumstance there.
I epedal by there a couple times a week and just today. I go to Spoke cafe often... if you;re heading there etc let me know I could meet you if so desired.
I've been using social media since long before the term "social media" was coined (e.g. Usenet, the earliest ARPANET mailing lists, etc.) I've avoided Facebook all along, used #Twitter quite a bit in its heyday (and maintain an account there that I keep locked now), and I used Google Plus quite heavily. I have accounts on Post (which is about to go dark, apparently), Bluesky (rarely look at it), Threads (hardly ever visit), etc.
Of course the scale of these can be vastly different. An ARPANET mailing list on the subject of wine tasting with a few hundred members was enough to trigger a Pentagon colonel coming out to sites to remind us all about appropriate usage of a Defense Department funded network.
That didn't change anything of course, and eventually DOD realized that such lists were pushing the evolution of email tools rapidly in very useful ways.
Did you know that the very first ARPANET mailing list Digest was for SF-LOVERS (science fiction discussion, obviously) and was created quickly as a "temporary" expedient because the direct (immediate) distribution list had gotten "too large" (probably still just hundreds) for available resources? The digest format created for that situation has remained largely unchanged since then and is still widely used on the Internet today.
I mention all this because in some ways #Mastodon is a throwback to those very early days (with Usenet being perhaps the closest parallel, given the Mastodon topological model). And Mastodon still manages to be quite "low pressure" in significant ways, even as your follower count goes up (which is the exact opposite of the situation on Twitter, even before Musk took over).
That is, when I check here in the morning, I don't usually feel the need to steel myself for a deluge of potential nastiness.
Older protocols like uucp and FidoNet have a philosophy behind them that's a bit deeper than high latency, though that is certainly true. They predate the existence of persistent channels, so many of their features address not simply high latency, but (in modern terms) 100% error rate for indefinite periods.
Lack of connectivity for batch-y protocols isn't an "error"; just just another state in the state machine.
(My brain still has a cluster of cells that thinks having a "permanent" connection is cheating, somehow. Or self delusion.)
The only modern stuff I know that thinks that way is Briar. Lol, I like Briar.