Mehr Gewinner als Lose? Heißt doch dass die Leut im best case im Schnitt weniger rausbekommen aus sie gezahlt haben?
Aber dann daneben, 3/4 der Loose gewonnen und man merkt dass die erste Zahl wohl komplet Falsch war, aber die Annahme dass es unglaublich viele Proformagewinne gibt die im Endeffekt ein Verlust sind, schon stimmen wird.
Es sieht leider ganz danach aus, als ob der #ORF nun leider ernst macht und Benuter:innen von #MediathekView nicht mehr mit Content versorgt. Die Anzahl der verfügbaren Sendungen ging in den letzten Tagen dramatisch runter.
I was actually mainly thinking about TV ads, billboards, analog newspaper ads, mailbox leaflets or whole papers that pretend to be a newspaper but are in reality a big ad, 😅
since thanks to AdBlockers, WebAds have seized to be a problem for me.
But you are right, the WWW without AdBlockers is a dangerous and unusable mess. At least here on the Web we have a technical solution against ads.
Bei Maybrit Illner erklärt @afelia den Elefanten im Raum:
Putin ist schon im Krieg mit uns. Deutsche Politiker drücken sich hier vor der Verantwortung und vor der Kommunikationsaufgabe, dies ihren Wählern zu vermitteln.
Truly impressive detail, that I had not previously seen with FFF printers. Even more impressive that, what was basically a big block of support material after printing, could peel of witho9ut much trouble to reveal the figures beneath it 😃
printed in @realraum on a Prusa MK4 Input Shaper with 0.07mm and and a 0.25mm nozzle.
OK, my state has something called "Arbeitsmarktservice". They basically help people find a new job, give them training and so on. They are usually very useless.
Today, they released an online tool to help answer job related questions. It's based on GPT-4. And it's ... amazing :D
Kicking Erwin Schrödinger out of my idols. Not because he chose a cat for his thought experiment, but because of one thing I learnt: he sexually abused children and kept a diary about it. 🤮 Src: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_Schr%C3%B6dinger#Sexual_abuse
Wikipedia verlinkt als Quelle obigen Artikel, der wesentliche Differenziertes sagt als die Wikipedia. Das sagt zumindest mal nix gutes über die Artikelqualität der WP 😑 wenn man eine Quelle so "zusammenfasst" und dabei zum gegenteiligen Schluss kommt.
Unabhängig davon sind die Vorwürfe, dazu weiß ich nix 🤷, aber Zweifel dürften mir aktuell noch angebracht sein.
In short, if you read the article from DerStandard, it sounds to me very much like Schrödinger knew exactly where to draw the line, skirted close but never crossed it.
Very different from how wikipedia summarizes the article.
Summary: cars depreciate from new towards zero. Only some folks buy brand new and run 'em into the ground. Many more lease then sell on or buy 2nd hand and re-sell later, extracting value. If you put a floor under the price of 2nd hand cars (b/c batteries in such cars have to have useful residual capacity) then you just raised the cost of driving for a large proportion of poorer drivers—unsustainably.
@cstross
So cars either have to become a much cheaper centralized mass product with reduced repairability and no secondary market.
Possibly e-cars will always need to be heavily subsidized by tax money.
Or they become a niche thing for the very rich, while general transport has to go other directions entirely. Possibly invalidating our last 1xx years of investment in roads. In time infrastructure for cars declines all together.
How come that people are working with tools (and content) like #Confluence, #Jira, #Webbrowsers in general, #Word, ... and don't have external #monitors in portrait orientation? 🤔 🤷 #PIM
Can only guess. I have a portrait monitor everywhere I have a PC setup. 😄
a) mediamarkt never demonstrates this for them? 😅
b) you need at least a 1200x1920 screen for portrait orientation. 1080 is just too narrow. They were not common last time I shopped for a portrait monitor