richlitt,
@richlitt@mastodon.social avatar

Fun question: If I am unaffiliated and I want to do a survey of people's experiences of the eclipse from a birding perspective, what do I do to pass IRB before thinking about publication, or do I just... skip that step?

inquiline,
@inquiline@union.place avatar

@richlitt Edited, misread this at first. If you're unaffiliated with an inst at all, then I don't think you have to (can do) IRB. If you're staff & unaffiliated w a dept, I would do the IRB process for the institution

richlitt,
@richlitt@mastodon.social avatar

@inquiline Right. That's my thinking.

But doesn't that mean that, as an independent researcher, it's possible that my work will be unethical? Am I the only blocker to that work happening, or is the peer review process supposed to catch that or something?

inquiline,
@inquiline@union.place avatar

@richlitt So, IRB & "ethical research" are not exactly synonyms. I'd include a description of methods in the paper, & explain how you thought about ethical considerations. If your after-event survey is unlikely to cause harm to participants who consent to being surveyed & can withdraw consent if they wish, it can be considered thoughtful & ethical research without IRB having been involved. That's how I'd look at it as a reviewer. (IRB is actually there to protect institutions more than subjects)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • academia
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • ngwrru68w68
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines