@matthias_aulbach@brembs@ivan_herman My version of "people" here - it's the subset of researchers who seem so shocked about the unreliability of individual papers, while it was always like this.
It's maybe like there's now a stronger tendency to treat a paper as an isolated separate object. As opposed to always considering the professional meta-information as a matter of course; e.g. you'd ideally know who wrote the paper and have met them or have some connection with them, even if indirect.