DuncanMSussexPol,
@DuncanMSussexPol@toot.community avatar

Had a invite land on my lap and have given it a whirl. Immediate thoughts:

  • different "missing" features - no edit, no trending, no hashtags (!). But quote posts, (optional) algorithms and text search is better vs .
  • more active accounts I remember from Birdsite than here.
  • unambiguously worse and uglier UI. It's bad.
  • vibes worse than here, closer to 2018 Birdsite (already bad) than 2012.
  • quiet vs here.
  • over serious & the funny accounts seem more forced than here.
DuncanMSussexPol,
@DuncanMSussexPol@toot.community avatar

My takeaways from vs (or in general)

  • both are good, here is better, not sure BlueSky quite good enough to properly use in parallel.
  • features-wise both BlueSky and Masto should crib off each other.
  • BlueSky's weaknesses and Masto's weaknesses compensate each other well. So AT was a mistake.
  • ideally AP should incorporate some of the technical improvements of AT and both should natively bridge.
  • if this doesn't happen displacing Birdsite will take much longer.
richardgrant,
@richardgrant@mastodon.social avatar

@DuncanMSussexPol Thanks for sharing this analysis. I haven’t kept up with bluesky so I’m fascinated to hear your impressions. When I was there (starting around the 50,000 user mark) the atmosphere was described by someone as a silicon valley cocaine party – not quite fair but funny, and not altogether off base

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • bluesky
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines