AI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pause
A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.
CookieJarObserver, This was kinda obvious from the start.
TheShadowKnows, deleted_by_author
NoneOfUrBusiness, I mean true enough, but that's not what's going on here. Copyright exists so artists can profit from their work, so if there's no artist it stands to reason copyright law shouldn't apply.
reanmachine, They will just use it to generate scripts, change it enough with a human and claim it’s just a tool.
Don’t think for one second this will slow down greed.
rafoix, Those scripts are going to make the current scripts look like classic literature.
Add comment