Massachusetts town grapples with sea rise after sand barrier fails

A $500,000 sand dune collapsed in days after being erected, and residents are looking for help to protect their homes

On the border with New Hampshire and Massachusetts – about 35 miles north of Boston – is Salisbury, a coastal town and popular summer destination for tourists. But for those who live in the town year round, especially those who live on the coastline, life’s not a beach.

Last month, after a series of storms battered the area, local citizens came together to take the necessary steps to protect their homes. Volunteer organization Salisbury Beach Citizens for Change raised more than $500,000 to erect a 15,000-ton sand dune – a formidable barrier that would hopefully protect at least 15 beach houses from destruction.

Or so they thought. The sand dune was completed after one month in early March, but just three days later, the dune – and nearly half a million dollars – was wiped away.

The tragic incident made the project a laughingstock to some and angered others.

renrenPDX,

Cliff-side house prices about to skyrocket. They’re the future beach front properties.

Pyr_Pressure,

Don’t mind the applications for fracking on the land next door, earthquakes rarely happen and those cliffs have held up for years.

JasonDJ,

Brb buying a beach house in Tennessee.

RunawayFixer,

It’s possible to restore degraded coastal dune systems (basically sand + grass) by human intervention, but it takes a lot more work and time than just putting down a pile of sand. And the newly restored dunes also need restricted access, or they would just degrade very fast again. Properly creating dunes would also mean that these houses would lose their direct seaview (or be demolished if they are in the way), so it’s probably not even an acceptable solution to these rich twats.

In Belgium and northern France there has been a successful 15y project to restore hundreds of hectares of dunes. The budget was about 8m euros, so for the amount of coastline that these dunes protect, it was actually quite cheap.

…europa.eu/…/flemish-and-north-french-dunes-resto…

ReverendIrreverence,
@ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world avatar

The person/company who “designed” and/or built this fragile seawall should be on the hook for most, if not all, of that utterly wasted money

Dkarma,

The property owners probably voted for it

ReverendIrreverence,
@ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world avatar

Was the company that got $500k a licensed, bonded reputable corporation or was it a dude with a dumptruck and access to a shit-ton of sand? Did whoever it was come to the HOA center and give a presentation “Dropping Science” and make a case for whatever plan for the “seawall” they had? If the property owners legally signed off on the plan then they rolled the dice and it came up craps.

slumlordthanatos,

🎵The wise man builds his house upon the rock…🎵

seth,

Salisbury stakes are much more expensive than I remember.

Flashfists,

laughs in DutchAmateurs

Daxtron2,

Dunes are a complex ecosystem, dumping more sand (which these beaches do every year) without restoring the ecosystem will do nothing to protect from erosion.

catch22, (edited )

And so castles made of sand… melts into the sea… eventually…

NatakuNox,
@NatakuNox@lemmy.world avatar

Screw their houses!

phoneymouse,

At this point, I don’t even want beachfront property. You’re going to have a bad time.

Bakkoda,

Depending on where you live it’s only a matter of time before you’ll own some

the_third,

“Oh, neat. Oh, crap.”

ReverendIrreverence,
@ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world avatar

I’d settle for some lake beachfront property

markr,

" local citizens came together to take the necessary steps to protect their homes." - the steps they took were obviously not the necessary steps, instead they were unnecessary and in fact idiotic.

The Town of Salisbury did not ‘grapple with sea rise’. An ad hoc association, Salisbury Beach Citizens for Change, basically the owners of multi-million dollar absurdly situated beach front homes, blew 500,000 dollars on one wall of a giant sand castle.

ShepherdPie,

I feel bad that these homeowners are basically facing a complete loss of their properties, but I’m more than a little miffed that they expect the state to save their homes because the beach next door is a “public beach.” I’m pretty sure the public beach ends where their properties begin and the state has no duty to keep the ocean off their property.

I bet a sea wall or jetty of large boulders would help, but I imagine the residents would complain about the unsightly walls/boulders and want to have their cake and eat it too by proposing some ridiculously expensive or difficult solution funded by the taxpayers that only benefits the residents of these 15 homes. This one idea already cost $33k per home and lasted 3 days.

Steve,

The state will not allow a seawall to be built.

markr,

For good reasons. Besides being a huge ongoing expense, they frequently end up amplifying the erosion, and would almost certainly degrade the public beaches adjacent to these houses.

catloaf,

Massachusetts beach law is complicated due to dating back before the American revolution. Most states allow private ownership to the high water line, but Massachusetts allows private ownership all the way to the low water line. So it doesn’t really make sense for the government to maintain their private property.

Now, if they want to cede the beach to the state, I think the state would be happy to build something more permanent. Hopefully also something that would improve the ecosystem.

Personally I think the state should take the beach and tell them to fuck off somewhere that’s not going to be building houses in fragile ecosystems.

I_Miss_Daniel,

Next time, build your house on wheels so you can tow it away from the edge.

riskable,
@riskable@programming.dev avatar

Anyone who’s ever driven by this area and sees this article will be like, “yep”.

How do these people even get home insurance? I bet they don’t even have any. No insurer in their right mind would insure these homes.

karashta,

Maybe they should pull their houses out of this predicament by their boot straps

tsonfeir,
@tsonfeir@lemm.ee avatar

Maybe they can cash in all those thoughts and prayers.

Niksolo80,

Maybe they should stop eating avocado toast and ordering coffee.

seth, (edited )

Don’t forget to advise them to learn how to code.

tsonfeir,
@tsonfeir@lemm.ee avatar

Right. All unnecessary expenses. Like donations to churches.

downpunxx,

Saw a video news clip of this story with the guy whose spearheading the local effort to get the state to cover the cost of continual sand barriers, when asked if he believed in climate change he said no, he really doesn't, but he would like some state monies please, for his multimillion dollar house, and the "billion dollars worth of real estate at risk"

Olhonestjim,

Nope, that real estate is clearly worthless.

Pyr_Pressure,

People just can’t admit they made a bad investment and want a government bailout.

FireRetardant,

The nerve that some asshole thinks they are entitled to hundreds of thousands to millions of taxpayer money to protect their wealthy property while the average american can barely afford a run down home or rent.

SnotFlickerman,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

They already made it clear they’re not interested in spending their own money. That nearly $600k sounds like a lot, but when you look into it, that cost was spread between numerous homes on the beach there. I was purusing the Beach Associations Facebook page trying to find details, and failed, but looking at the coastline and the number of houses on it, I’d wager it was meant to protect at least twenty homes, if not plenty more. These are multi-million dollar homes, and if it was only 20 homes involved, that’s about $30k each, which suddenly feels much more affordable to rich fucking twats.

So a group of rich twats bundled together to barely scrape together just over half a million, because all of them are too fucking cheap to pay what it would actually cost to solve this problem, and further, don’t think it’s actually a problem except to them and their homes.

What a bunch of cheap idiot fucking tools. Rich people are always so fucking cheap.

catloaf,

The problem is that the way to actually solve this problem is to move. Building a seawall would be environmentally harmful and would only delay the damage by years or decades.

Confused_Emus,

When his house falls into the ocean he’ll have exactly what he deserves.

Theharpyeagle, (edited )

The Tom Saab mentioned in the article, unsurprisingly, owns a lot of rental properties on that beach. So it’s asking the government to protect his risky investment.

tb_,
@tb_@lemmy.world avatar

He should just sell his house

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • news@lemmy.world
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • everett
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •