@dreid If/once https://peps.python.org/pep-0735/ lands I would love to have a conversation about standardizing how virtual environments are managed (i.e., location, name)
@brettcannon I was thinking the other day, that if PEP 665 got "lukewarm" reception, cause it was focusing on wheels, and reproducability and later on add src (that's my takeaway from the thread), why not do the same proposal but inverted, with src/dist, sort of standarized "requirements.txt" and wheels and reproducibility later on? (I know it's not your use case, but might be a way to just move on with the whole thing? As far as I could tell one wouldn't step onto the other?) @kaleissin@dreid
@minkiu@kaleissin@dreid Because I only have so much time in this world and I've spent enough of it already doing stuff purely for others that I don't work on projects unless I'm getting something out of it. It's also a motivation thing: I'm about to become a parent and I'm not going to spend non-family time on something that doesn't interest or help me.
@minkiu@kaleissin@dreid Or more bluntly, if this doesn't work I'm walking away from putting time into lock files and trying to push this particular stone up the hill.
Add comment