That seemed like an interesting idea, but also all their assets were liquidised and invested in government bonds, and what they got back at the end of their term depended on the change in value of government assets.
Which sounds like an incentive for corruption to me.
@melissabeartrix I can confirm this. We had a PM running a "caretaker" government after her predecessor was taken down in a no-confidence vote after a corruption scandal. She was a former Constitutional Court justice. Best government we've had in decades.
Add comment