travisfw,
@travisfw@fosstodon.org avatar

Occasionally I have heard Fediversians talk about reviving . Web rings had some serious problems. No protocol for inclusion, no sense of how big they are, no anchor text (just click "next" and see what you get)…
What about a ? The Ring Web is a web of web rings!

travisfw,
@travisfw@fosstodon.org avatar

A should be a thing. To make the ring a thing, a collection of people (or instances) could run some one-liner that does a worse-is-better style synchronization with regard to what defines the ring. That way you know what thing the ring is.

These ring things should be at-a-glance simple, delete themselves on abuse, and super easily reinstantiate with most of the same members.

I think this could be the beginning of a truly architecture.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • vwfavf
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines