annmlipton, 29 days ago was waiting for this opinion re: whether directors owe duties to "diversified" shareholders. awesome opening, correct as to doctrine, but there's a lot of tension in the doctrine https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=363410
was waiting for this opinion re: whether directors owe duties to "diversified" shareholders.
awesome opening, correct as to doctrine, but there's a lot of tension in the doctrine
https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=363410
annmlipton, 29 days ago wait what image/png
wait what
image/png
luis_in_brief, 29 days ago @annmlipton surprised because you don't think that would work? or because never, on the coldest day in hell, would "corporate planners" adopt such language?
@annmlipton surprised because you don't think that would work? or because never, on the coldest day in hell, would "corporate planners" adopt such language?
annmlipton, 29 days ago @luis_in_brief surprised bc it's been an ongoing debate re: abandoning wealth max in the charter
@luis_in_brief surprised bc it's been an ongoing debate re: abandoning wealth max in the charter
luis_in_brief, 29 days ago @annmlipton oh, interesting!
@annmlipton oh, interesting!
luis_in_brief, 29 days ago @annmlipton this looks fascinating and... urk, 102 pages. Day job beckons, sadly.
@annmlipton this looks fascinating and... urk, 102 pages. Day job beckons, sadly.
Add comment