fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

hut, to random
@hut@chaos.social avatar

Been running a jpg -> conversion script on all of my photographs for 2-3 nights. 😂

I'm down from 92 gigs to 84, and I'm halfway through, I expect saving 16 gigs (~17%) in total, with zero information loss.

I hope I don't regret this :D 3 more nights to go.

fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

jimmac, to GNOME
@jimmac@mastodon.social avatar

Can't stop nerding out about JPEG-XL.

#gnome #gnome47 #wallpaper #design #blender3d #jpegxl

Not just an insane compression, color-banding-busting grain FTW!

nhoizey, to photography French
@nhoizey@mamot.fr avatar

Should I please Lighthouse with modern image formats, or my visitors with progressive rendering of large images in my photography site? 🤔

Of course, this would be much easier with genaralized JPEG XL support, both modern and allowing progressive… 🤷‍♂️

#image #JPEGXL #Lighthouse #photography #WebPerf

⚓️ https://nicolas-hoizey.com/notes/2024/04/24/1/

hut, to random
@hut@chaos.social avatar

TIL you can reduce the size of a PNG by ~70% without any perceptible quality loss by converting to the new, royalty free format JPEG XL.

It can also do completely lossless conversion, which saves you about ~50% file size.

And it has a really cool feature to reversibly transcode existing JPEG files to JPEG XL, shaving off ~20% size.

Currently converting my image collections to that :).

Lossless conversion:

> cjxl input.png output.jxl --quality 100 --effort 10

https://siipo.la/blog/whats-the-best-lossless-image-format-comparing-png-webp-avif-and-jpeg-xl

fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

nucliweb, to random
@nucliweb@webperf.social avatar

Jpegli is a new JPEG coding library that is designed to be faster, more efficient, and more visually pleasing than traditional JPEG

https://opensource.googleblog.com/2024/04/introducing-jpegli-new-jpeg-coding-library.html

mgorny, to gentoo Polish
@mgorny@pol.social avatar

Po tym, jak udało mi się rozwiązać problem z ichnim sandboksem, udało mi się uruchomić Firefoksa, zbudowanego ze źródeł, z załączonym wsparciem . Niestety, wygląda na to, że jest niekompletne.

nhoizey, to random French
@nhoizey@mamot.fr avatar

Is that an article actually written 4 years ago? 🤡


https://mas.to/@frontenddogma/112139799177081337

nhoizey, to random French
@nhoizey@mamot.fr avatar

🔗 “JPEG XL and the Pareto Front”

⚓️ https://nicolas-hoizey.com/links/2024/02/29/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front/

nucliweb, to random
@nucliweb@webperf.social avatar

JPEG XL and the Pareto Front

https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

mgorny, to random Polish
@mgorny@pol.social avatar

Wyszło 0.10, i bije jeszcze bardziej.

"""
Nowa wersja libjxl przynosi znaczną redukcję zużycia pamięci, o rząd wielkości, zarówno dla kompresji stratnej, jak i bezstratnej. Poprawiono również wydajność, zwłaszcza dla wielowątkowej kompresji bezstratnej, dla których domyślnie ustawienie "wysiłku" jest teraz o rząd wielkości wydajniejsze.

To konsoliduje pozycję JPEG XL jako najlepszego, obecnie dostępnego kodeku graficznego, zarówno dla kompresji bezstratnej, jak i stratnej, dla szerokiego zakresu ustawień jakości, a w szczególności dla zakresu jakości wysokiej do wizualnie bezstratnej. Jest Pareto-optymalny dla szerokiego zakresu ustawień szybkości.
"""
(tłum. własne)

https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

nhoizey, to random French
@nhoizey@mamot.fr avatar

🔗 “JPEG XL and the Pareto Front”

⚓️ https://nicolas-hoizey.com/links/2024/02/29/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front/

gianni, to photography
@gianni@disobey.net avatar

JPEG-XL and the Pareto Front

A closer look at libjxl 0.10

https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

nhoizey, to random French
@nhoizey@mamot.fr avatar

🔗 “JPEG XL has not been selected for Interop 2024”

⚓️ https://nicolas-hoizey.com/links/2024/02/02/jpeg-xl-has-not-been-selected-for-interop-2024/

fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

gianni, to chrome
@gianni@disobey.net avatar

Browser maker love-in snubs next-gen image format

"... Interop 2024 omits JPEG XL, the most popular proposal as measured by community reactions (emojis added to proposal discussion threads). JPEG XL garnered 646 reactions, more than four times more than the second place finisher, which also wasn't included."

An unfortunate conclusion from a clearly biased group that is supposed to be unbiased. Unfortunate, unclear decision making from Interop this year.

https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/03/jpeg_xl_interop_2024/

fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

nekohayo, to web
@nekohayo@mastodon.social avatar

/ , the most requested and upvoted focus area proposal for , has again been rejected as a discussion topic for 2024's web platform Interop industry event, because "We did not have consensus to include this proposal."

Given the industry's broad support, lack of "consensus" sounds an awful lot like "the Google Chrome team lead who authored the AVIF format arranged for it to be vetoed."
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/430

nekohayo,
@nekohayo@mastodon.social avatar

@SoniEx2 I absolutely would do that if Mozilla suddenly found their cojones and allowed to ship in stable instead of acting like a tamed old dog on a leash.

I can't recommend Safari because it is proprietary and Mac-only, and for the moment Epiphany (aka "Safari on Linux") does not meet Firefox's level of performance and reliability according to my testing & bug reporting; even on Linux, Epiphany remains a niche of a niche. There is no option for the bajillions Windows users…

nhoizey, to random French
@nhoizey@mamot.fr avatar

🔗 “JPEG XL has not been selected for Interop 2024”

⚓️ https://nicolas-hoizey.com/links/2024/02/02/jpeg-xl-has-not-been-selected-for-interop-2024/

fsf, to random
@fsf@hostux.social avatar

Google's deprecation of demonstrates its unjust amount of control over the web. Read our writeup here: https://u.fsf.org/3z8

gianni, to windows
@gianni@disobey.net avatar

JPEG-XL in wincodec.h - maybe this means it is coming to Windows?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • Leos
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • vwfavf
  • PowerRangers
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • rosin
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • provamag3
  • All magazines
    •