@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

EtherWhack

@EtherWhack@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

I guess they’ve never hard of the borg…

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Unfortunately that wouldn’t be likely, considering there is history of fires with improperly designed/tested devices even from “respectable” brands (see note7). With e-bikes, the same issue would apply and with the battery being much larger and charging much faster; generating more heat and creating a larger potential for a runaway reaction.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

…in frustration and anger.

To explain a bit, institutions will likely freeze all your accounts (including your money) until the mistake is “officially” corrected. This means without family or a friend to help, you can easily get stuck.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

It would be tricky as they can only release them with an official correction, which can take time.

One of the biggest reasons they would freeze them is for fraud prevention. If there is any activity on an account when a person is supposed to be dead, it would indicate something is awry and it’s their duty to prevent it.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Supposedly their motive is altruistic in nature for not allowing this “reminder” to be disabled is that some users may forget to backup and not wanting the user to get upset with losing something.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

When they retire, some parents like to move to more rural and out of the way areas. It can be really difficult, sometimes impossible to find a well enough paying job in the middle of nowhere.

Happened to me; work in the tech sector in engineering as a tech and will be continuing classes for ME and/or EE. No way in hell would I find a job where they live that makes use of my experience. (I’d likely have to start anew by flipping burgers or be a slave at Amazon)

EtherWhack, (edited )
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

I doubt that fine would be legal. The most I’ve seen is just a standard requirement for a license/permit (i.e. legal ownership), and maybe restricting open/concealed-carry in the neighborhood (but outside the house. Inside your house is out of the HOA’s grasp, though.)

vinteum.io/security/qas-about-guns-in-your-hoa/

Edit: Kansas actually doesn’t require any license or permit to buy or own a gun. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Kansas

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

They could be liable if, and only if they are proven to be be aware (or willfully ignorant) that the man’s general conduct/demeanor would indicate a proclivity to violence rather than him just being crotchety. Unfortunately, things like that can be hard to prove as they can require a lot of digging.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Illicit rule making being in their repertoire wouldn’t make it any more just (two wrongs, and everything) or enforceable, as the gun owner could easily just not abide by or pay it. Also, Making any regulation/fee or anything to “frustrate” gun owners could also be seen as harassment.

There is no indication that the guy ever used or brandished the gun outside his home, which is where the HOA’s jurisdiction would be. Like I said, the HOA can’t do a damn thing about what goes on inside someone’s home. If they were to try, it would fall flat the minute it gets challenged especially with Kansas being one of the states having a castle doctrine which implies the possibile use of a gun (i.e. deadly force) for defense.

The case is likely going to be about the castle doctrine and it’s limits on whether someone standing on your doorstep constitutes a threat, (which it doesn’t) along with trying to prove that the kid was trying to break in (this I doubt) which could justify an imminent threat.

I am in no way on the side of the old man. I actually think he was completely in the wrong (also got off way too easy) and the kid was legitimately just at the wrong house.

My opinion is the man should be evaluated for mental fitness and if unfit would be required to need a caretaker, of sorts. If no mental issues, be tried and convicted for the first degree assault (attempted homicide) charge.

The HOA however does not have any actual stake in it that I’ve found, as the kid was shot from behind the storm door by the old man who was inside his house.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Yes. I’m not saying that they wouldn’t try to come up with bogus/farfetched regulations, but they legitimately cannot do anything about what goes on behind closed doors in someone’s house. To do otherwise would be a breach in that person’s right to privacy. It’d be like an HOA telling you, you have to vacuum/sweep/mop every other day, otherwise you can be fined. (or saying you can’t have sex on Sundays)

HOAs do have some extralegal clout, but the right to privacy stops them from interfering in anything you do that isn’t openly visible. (i.e. Doing a meatspin in front of a window facing the street can be penalized, but taking a dump in your kitchen sink can’t, unless the sink is in front of a window facing the street and the blinds/curtains/shutters are open.)

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

And if they do, they open themselves up to a lawsuit.

But, in relation to the story. It’s a gun owning, likely conservative (and MAGA’d), prejudicial old white man with nothing better to do but watch his balls sink lower and lower. Harassing him or his money with BS regulations for him having a gun in his house will just have him spend the huge amount of free time he has fighting them and likely filing a claim/s against the HOA

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

It depends.

With tearing apart drives over the years, 3.5" always used aluminum platters, while the 2.5" ones used glass. (With greater data density and higher speeds however, this may have changed)

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

One of the first things they taught in my micro bio class is that no single bacteria is bad. What is bad is when they are where they shouldn’t be. This makes the point of hand washing more or less to remove bacteria that may be problematic being on your hands where you could spread them to vulnerable areas.

Regular hand soap is perfectly fine. It may dry your hands out from overuse, but as soon as you touch any part of your body (like your arms or face) your hands would be inoculated with your body’s natural flora that resides on your skin.

Antibacterial soap would be the larger issue, as a lot of them have what is called a persistent effect. This persistent effect means that the antibacterial agent leaves traces of itself behind and will kill any bacteria that is susceptible to it. While good if used responsibly for people like surgeons to eliminate/reduce any stray bacteria during a procedure, this can lead to the same sort of scenario we have with antibiotics where some bacteria may develop a resistance to it, which could also include pathogenic varients/strains.

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

If by gay you mean joyful, then yes, I am very joyful.

EtherWhack, (edited )
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah the first two look like western skinks. The last one looks like a southern alligator lizard

Edit: Assuming the weed on the right is burclover, the eggs do look like they’d be about the right size. (5-7mm?)

https://www.australianaddiction.com/GO_SkinkEggs.jpg

https://www.reptilefact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Southern-Alligator-Lizard-Eggs.png

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

The problem is, is that our legislation system was built with the intention of stability and to make any changes, all sides would have to somewhat agree. At some point it unfortunately has drifted off course and with everyone polarized other over whose side is right or wrong, it became a game of endless tic-tac-toe of keeping the other side from “winning”

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Earmarking this for an office potluck idea

EtherWhack,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

I wonder if the “M” in his channel’s name stands for Mays as the more I see him the more I see Billy Mays. (though it could also stand for manlett)

EtherWhack, (edited )
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Unmonitored or unrestricted, no. Just no…

There are too many bad people out there and young children don’t always know how to keep their info hidden. The risk is just too high. Even one out of a million kids finding one of those unsavory people, would be too much. Think about if your hypothetical child found that one child predator and they got them to share whatever, like pictures; their school/schedule; etc.

Just look at roblox, a game more or less built and intended for children. There’s been quite a few reports of kids being preyed upon to which they have several lawsuits against them for giving a false sense of safety.

E: fixed name

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • vwfavf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • PowerRangers
  • Leos
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • All magazines