Feathercrown

@Feathercrown@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Feathercrown,

I’m so glad to see someone share my mentality. If shit happens, and you leave, the people who let it happen are still there! It’ll only get worse! Stay and fight it!

Feathercrown,

And I don’t believe such a high amount of men who aren’t predators are bothered by it.

It doesn’t bother you when you’re referred to as a predator because you share a gender with some of them?

Feathercrown,

It’s almost like it was planted

I swear the left gets more conspiratorial every day. There doesn’t have to be some grand plan to sow dissent. Dissent is something that just happens naturally because this conflict is deeply ingrained in our culture. Nobody has to scheme to make it happen.

Feathercrown,

Idk man it’s not that extreme

Feathercrown,

Very true, but I think there’s something lost in translation when people go on the internet and turn “I need to be cautious around men because they might be dangerous” to “Men are dangerous,” and this generalization is what causes so much of the backlash online.

Feathercrown,

I think it’s a right to take antagonism at face value, but a virtue to step back anyways and turn it into a positive experience. Not that the original man vs bear question was actually antagonistic, but some of the surrounding discussion can be.

Feathercrown,

I’m in the same boat. Are they just being reported before I can see them?

Feathercrown,

prejudices originally existed for self-protection

Huh?

Feathercrown,

I really appreciate that you made this post. Every top-level comment here is complaining about it being “rage bait” and that the question would “never foster productive discussion.” Why? Why aren’t men capable of seeing the scenario, recognizing why it’s necessary to say something like that, and getting over themselves just a little bit to get the point? The original question wasn’t even a “not all men” thing, there’s no actual reason to get mad about it enough to dismiss the dicussion. We have to be able to have a conversation where the other side is allowed to say something a tiny bit outside of our standards for what we want them to say, or we’ll never have a conversation at all.

Feathercrown,

Yeah she didn’t even “all men” him like wtf

Feathercrown,

Like I said, it’s your right to not take it. But it’s virtuous to deescalate and continue the productive conversation.

Feathercrown,

Some random database was poisoned. Nobody in actual society cares.

Feathercrown,

I know this is stupid but I still refuse to check out Beeper because that is the dumbest possible name I can think of

NorthWestWind, to showerthoughts
@NorthWestWind@wetdry.world avatar

Philosophy is just applied existential crisis

@showerthoughts

Feathercrown,

Philosophy being reduced to only pondering about existential questions is a tragedy of misrepresentation. Philosophy is the study of thinking, and that covers a very wide range of topics.

Feathercrown,

Well, existentialism and nihilism kind of apply an existential crisis to reduce your personal suffering. That only works if you believe them though lol

Feathercrown,

I defy your meme, for my body is a temple. The only edible things allowed in here are potato chips and deep fried foods, thank you

Feathercrown,

Thanks! Will check it out. I salute your efforts to spread awareness about lemmy stifling SA talk.

Feathercrown, (edited )

Thanks again :D

Feathercrown,

They’re critiquing the structure more than the content

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • GTA5RPClips
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines