Replies

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

A distributed social web of meaningful relationships.

Instead of a few centralized walled-garden apps that only tell you what an unaccountable third party wants you to know.

P.S. Still working on the messaging... how can I improve this?

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@mousey maybe there are two steps: have a machine help me find interesting people that I wouldn’t easily find myself can be valuable. But it needs to be optional and get out of the way once the relationship is established.

meissa, to test
@meissa@social.meissa-gmbh.de avatar

@J12t Hi Johannes, do you have a solution for such integration tests in place / planed?

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/fe3473fc8b7b51e024b1a564fc7f01e385ebfb5e/tests/integration/api_activitypub_repository_test.go#L76-L115

Would love to be able to make better integration tests ...

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@meissa We're working on it. I assume you have seen https://feditest.org/ ? Docs are roughly current. Other than working through open issues, our next goal is to publish a set of webfinger test results within days, and then get more and more of the tests in tests/fediverse to work against a small set of fediverse applications. Maybe forgejo could be one of them? Join us in the Matrix group?

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar
J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Tried to send a message to the IETF's mailing list with some feedback from @feditest. Tried three different sender e-mail addresses. None of them went through. Not sure what else to try.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@jimfenton I'm supposedly joined ... maybe there is a manual approval process beyond the automatic e-mail confirm?

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@jimfenton I know, which is why I had some feedback!!

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@jimfenton I sent e-mail to support, let's see what they have to say.

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Making glazed citron from this recipe and the lemons in the front yard. I’m on the last day, trying to get it to 235deg F. Somehow (heh!) the temperature doesn’t want to rise above 212. I think I made some kind of scientific discovery /s

https://www.davidlebovitz.com/making-glazed-candied-fruit-citron-recipe/

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Duuhhhh … turns out the silly Bluetooth thermometer also has a 212F limit, and doesn’t indicate it!! So I’ve been burning my citron while waiting for it to get hotter!!

fentiger, to random

@Fediverse Test Suite This is looking very promising! In about an hour of work, my WebFinger endpoint is now almost fully "FediTest compliant", with just two wrinkles: percent encoding and an unexpected keyword argument.

I'm not comfortable with rejecting requests just because they fail to percent-encode the @ so my vote is for that test to be relaxed a bit.

Overall I'm impressed with how easy it was to get this running. Switching from the quickstart instructions to testing my own instance just involved copying the "gargron" example test plan and changing a few parameters. It couldn't have been simpler.

I haven't looked at the UBOS stuff yet. That will have to wait for another day.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@fentiger You are the first one to accuse us we are making simple :-) Rest assured, testing bidirectional interactions won't be as simple as WebFinger tests... but then, we sure try!

/cc @feditest

J12t, to meta
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Finally I'm getting around to listen to @mike 's Dot.Social episode with @rklambo and @pcottle from , talking about .

Mike asks the most important question first: "why are you [Meta] doing this [Fediverse integration]?"

[cont]

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Rachel: one of the challenges with the fediverse is: how do you figure out where your content went, and how can I follow that conversation that now exists on multiple different servers?

Wants all replies in the same spot. That helps feel people in control.

This is actually a really good point imho. It's not just confusing that reply trees aren't eventually consistent across the fediverse, but it creates uncertainty because I don't even know what people say in response.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Peter: one of the advantages of is that you can limit exposure to other servers.

is all public, and that's another reason why is a better match for Meta.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Rachel: re monitization, so far we are only focused on giving people a great experience on Threads

Going forward, they want to hear from lots of people and communities and regulators before they figure out what is acceptable and what not.

Peter: quotes a session from @fediforum where business models were discussed.

Mike: there will be many business models.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Mike: "one of the original sins of the internet is that the relationship between the person and a website was not done at the protocol level. I see the fediverse with the ability to have a direct relationship as a core answer to them treating people with respect."

This is as close as a pitch as I have heard from somebody who hasn't been part of the VRM community! https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/Main_Page

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Peter is thanking the community working so well together and help debug bugs live!

"We are all on team fediverse!"

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar
J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@julian Where are you having that conversation?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • slotface
  • PowerRangers
  • Durango
  • vwfavf
  • kavyap
  • tsrsr
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • Leos
  • magazineikmin
  • rosin
  • tacticalgear
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • All magazines