Mrs_deWinter

@Mrs_deWinter@feddit.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Mrs_deWinter,

Das ist ein privater Verein. Die können tun und lassen was sie wollen.

Und wir Privatleute dürfen das so richtig scheiße finden, inklusive Anmaßungen und Gegenaktionen.

Dreckstraditionen verdienen keinen Respekt.

Mrs_deWinter,

Aktuell wird doch ne Stromtrasse durch BW gebaut. Diese lächerliche Nummer von wegen, wir hätten gerne Strom, aber keine Trasse, war eine astreine CSU Nummer.

Mrs_deWinter,

Auch wenn die eine Frau finden, die für ihre Familie gerne Zuhause bleibt; die soziale Dynamik einer Ehe ist heute einfach eine andere. Auch eine Hausfrau kann sich ohne große soziale Hürden von ihrem Mann trennen und hat dann Anspruch auf Unterhalt von ihm. Diese realen Freiräume kriegt man nicht mehr zurückgedreht.

Wenn ein Rechter heutzutage darauf hofft, in seiner Beziehung immer das letzte Wort zu haben, dann kann der nur frustriert werden, denn das ist einfach nicht mehr Realität. Eine so ungleiche Beziehung ist heutzutage entweder ein elaboriertes Rollenspiel (aus dem die Frau dann aber auch jederzeit aussteigen kann) oder geht nur mit emotionaler und psychischer Gewalt (aus der die Frau mit genügend Hilfe früher oder später abhaut).

Mrs_deWinter,

“Rollenspiel” in dem Sinne, dass die Eheleute faktisch gleichberechtigt sind. Du kannst als Hausfrau einfach gehen, ob dein Mann das erlaubt oder nicht. Wenn du dich unterordnest, dann vor dem Hintergrund deiner Entscheidung, so zu tun, als könntest du nicht. Schon klar, dass manche Menschen einfach gern Hausfrau oder Hausmann sind - aber das ist ja nur ein Detail dessen, was rechte Männer hier scheinbar gerne hätten. Eine traditionelle Rollenverteilung: Möglich. Eine traditionelle Rechteverteilung: Nur solange beide so tun, als ob.

Mrs_deWinter,

This idea of “actually, all Germans secretly think this way” is a common excuse of modern day Nazis to justify their increasingly brazen behaviour in public. Just so you know whose talking points you’re reproducing here.

Verein für Lemmy im deutschsprachigen Raum (matrix.to) German

Einige Menschen aus dem deutschsprachigen Lemmyteil haben sich in dem verlinkten Matrixraum zusammengefunden, um die Gründung eines Lemmy-Vereines zu planen. Die Planung des Vereines geht aus der Erfahrung hervor, dass feddit.de den Betrieb aus technischen Gründen^TM^ seit 2 Monaten stark einschränken musste und den...

Mrs_deWinter, (edited )

Würde mir da auch mehr Kommunikation wünschen. Oder… überhaupt mal Kommunikation. Matrix ist Mist für sowas, da könnte der Admin gleich auch einen Mail Newsletter anbieten statt einfach mal hier was anzuheften.

Einen Vorwurf machen kann man aber wahrscheinlich nicht. Life’s a bitch. Sachen passieren. Und klar ist dann das Lemmy-Hobby zweitrangig. Das würde jede*r anderen von uns auch so gehen.

Es zeigt halt aber einfach, dass dieses Projekt in dieser Form zum Scheitern verurteilt war. Sowas kann nicht an einer Person hängen, oder dieser Point of no Return wird zwangsläufig irgendwann erreicht, sobald halt privat was dazwischenkommt.

It was nice while it lasted. Lasst uns was draus lernen und die nächste große deutsche Lemmy Instanz auf nachhaltigere Füße stellen.

Mrs_deWinter,

Die Idee von Volt war ursprünglich ja aber wirklich ein neuer Blickwinkel und vor allem eine neue Art, europäische Politik zu machen. Das EU Parlament ohne Volt ist so, als hätten wir im Bundestag nur Regionalparteien sitzen. Volt ist aus der Idee entstanden, dass es eine europäische Partei braucht, die eine länderübergreifende Perspektive vertritt. Das ist nicht “spezifischer”, sondern eben was originär neues.

Mrs_deWinter,

Gut zu wissen, das hatte ich gar nicht auf dem Schirm. Dann waren Volt die zweiten mit dieser Idee. Trotzdem finde ich den Blickwinkel neu und wichtig genug. Eines Tages sitzen vielleicht nur noch pan-europäische Parteien im EU Parlament.

CSU wird auch nicht mehr ohne weiteres in den Bundestag gewuppt - und das ist auch gut so.

Mrs_deWinter, (edited )

It’s going to be hard for her partner, friends, and family, but it would be so much worse and so traumatic if she didn’t have help or had to hide the desires until she took her own life regardless of the laws.

I’m not sure that’s true. Losing someone to suicide is in itself quite traumatic. One relief many people have is when they wrap their head around how a self destructive impulse in the heat of an especially devastating moment could have led to it. But living with the fact that your daughter/wife/sister/friend very consciously decided she would rather be dead than to share in this life with you - that’s tough. It’s not unusual with relatives of suicide victims to struggle with feelings of intense anger towards the person they lost, which in turn can lead to feelings of guilt and shame. It’s hard to work through something like that. And I don’t think it gets any easier if the circumstances are as emphasised as in this case.

I think there are very valid use cases for assisted suicide. Personally I doubt that depression is one of them, because suicidality is such an inextricable part of the disorder itself. At the end of the day this is a suicide, just with extra steps and a stamp of approval by a national agency. The people surviving her will not only have to work through the fact of her suicide but process the official approval as well.

The only advantage to a “regular” suicide I can think of is avoiding the trauma of the person finding you. (Although there are probably ways around that anyway.) But I guess she has her reasons to have chosen this specific method and setting.

Mrs_deWinter,

I am a psychotherapist. Mental disorders are often curable. Our mind, our psyche, our brain develop and change in every waking moment, one small increment at a a time. A good indication for this are mental disorders themselves. Their emergence is proof of our mind’s capability to change - for the worse, in this case, but change nonetheless.

So in theory it should always be possible to change the other way around, to get significantly better to the point where the disorder is no longer present. (If you define a episode of mental health and wellbeing after a depressive episode as “managing” a still present disorder, then sure, they are incurable, but that’s because that’s part of your definition to begin with. The symptoms of a mental disorder can definitely disappear.) A more difficult question would be if our surroundings and social realities allow for so much change to take place. And sometimes, unfortunately, this isn’t possible, since our society can be a fucked up place and economic constrains have an unavoidable influence on our capability to shape our own path.

Still, in my personal experience working with hundreds of patiens in different therapeutic setting, most people can (and do) reclaim their mental health, given supportive surroundings and adequate treatment. From your pessimistic outlook at mental health I will cautiously assume that you don’t have those widely available to you. In this case you’d be somewhat right: Under such circumstances the possibilities to cure mental disorders are limited. Another complicating factor might be mental disorders themselves though. The feeling of “this is never going to get better, I’ll never be happy again” is one most people with depressive disorders know all to well. So if we ask the affected people directly we will often arrive at the conclusion that the disorders are in fact incurable. And that’s a horrible feeling for sure. I find it important to remember though that what our thoughts tell us in those dark episodes isn’t necessarily the truth. In this case I’d argue it isn’t. I’ve seen too many examples of the opposite, luckily.

Mrs_deWinter,

Oh god not Outward. After trying it recently I’m honestly kinda shocked that it’s being played at all. Me and my mate got the impression of playing through a 20 year old hobby game dev project at best.

It felt so very unpolished. Combat, UI, inventory management, dialogues, character creation, narrative, quest logs, crafting; it all feels ancient. Co-op especially - only the host progresses the story, gets quest rewards, and so on. A second player can kinda come along, but that’s it.

Don’t want to discredit old fans of the game ofc, but I honestly believe without a hefty dose of nostalgia you wont enjoy it. It would be like picking up Half-Life for the first time in 2024 and expecting a decent game.

Mrs_deWinter,

BS headline. Side effects are not the reason it’s withdrawn.

Mrs_deWinter,

But that’s not how it was framed at the courts at all, proven by the fact that all the other product names containing “milk” were considered okay. It was specifically argued that customers could be confused to accidentally buy the vegan variant. Based on your arguments “coconut milk” should be problematic, but it isn’t. Soy milk and almond milk could have been grandfathered in, but they weren’t, and the reason very specifically was pressure from the dairy industry targeting their competition.

Mrs_deWinter,

I understand the frustration about the injustice behind it, but it’s missing the point. Justice should never be the reason to support something thats so harmful to our environment. Imagine giving a private jet to every economically disadvantaged person in the name of equality - we’d be fucking ourselves over big time. Meat is actually a luxury product that’s only kept affordable based on some of the most environmentally destructive tools of capitalism.

It sucks that luxury products exist. It sucks that ultra rich people exist, but it’s the unfortunate fact of our times. Overturning this system is a seperate fight. And eating red meat won’t win it.

[Serious] Why do so many people seem to hate veganism?

Seen a lot of posts on Lemmy with vegan-adjacent sentiments but the comments are typically very critical of vegan ideas, even when they don’t come from vegans themselves. Why is this topic in particular so polarising on the internet? Especially since unlike politics for example, it seems like people don’t really get upset by...

Mrs_deWinter,

I find that hard to believe tbh. Maybe if someone doesn’t think about it at all. But the second you do it should be pretty obvious that killing an animal and not killing an animal are different scenarios, and very generally speaking one of those is better than the other.

The only alternative I could think of would have to be based on the assumption that an animal’s life absolutely doesn’t matter at all, and I never did (nor would want to) meet anyone who honestly believed that.

Mrs_deWinter,

Guess you’re right. But except for this scenario where your religion tells you it’s better to kill an animal than not to kill an animal, I would still expect most if not all ethical considerations to eventually conclude that not killing something is preferable. Otherwise I fail to see how someone could not agree with this as lowest common denominator.

Mrs_deWinter, (edited )

Weird source, they absolutely identified the person, and it was Abu Sitta. He was the reason the conference had to be stopped.

edit.: I’ve looked for a somewhat decent German source to share and found something interesting. The Palestine conference was banned because a speaker named Abu Sitta wanted to hold a speech, who is banned from political activity in Germany. This guy is specifically pro Hamas and said, if he was younger he would’ve participated in the Hamas attack himself. At the same time this other person was banned from entry into the country, also named Abu Sitta. I’m now left wondering if this Schengen ban was mistakenly issued and meant for the other guy.

Mrs_deWinter,

Auf Landstraßen fährst du im Auto mit 100km, das ist gegenüber dem Rad deutlich schneller. In der Stadt ist der Unterschied viel kleiner, da überwiegen wahrscheinlich die anderen Vorteile des Radfahrens.

Mrs_deWinter,

Where I live you call an ambulance.

Mrs_deWinter,

There’s a different number. 110 gets the police, 112 emergency services (so either fire department, ambulance, or an emergency doctor).

Mrs_deWinter,

Yeah I figured it’s not really an option in the US. Here it doesn’t cost anything.

Mrs_deWinter,

The thing is, he wasn’t even a psychologist.

Mrs_deWinter,

That’s a really drastic comparison man. The Berlin police didn’t ran over the protesters with tanks off camera.

Mrs_deWinter,

And what part of that is mirrored in me providing very situation-specific context to a YouTube video?

Mrs_deWinter,

So you’ll not even attempt to argue in favour of your claim? I can do that as well, you know.

Your rhetorics are the exact shit facists use. Word for fucking word.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Leos
  • tester
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines