NeatNit

@NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

NeatNit,

This is all progressing way too slowly T_T

NeatNit,

The process that’s used to kill, or in short, the ‘kill process’.

(though I like the other answer better)

NeatNit,

Depends on a lot of things. If medicine like paracetamol can make you suffer less with little to no downsides, there’s no reason to avoid it. But other than that, I’m also in the same camp of letting the body do its work. Definitely things like antibiotics are more trouble than they’re worth in most cases.

NeatNit,

And the mouse-over text: WHY DOES EVERYONE LIKE RABBITS?! GUYS!

And the source link: www.smbc-comics.com/comic/the-velveteen-rabbit

that’s it I think. To be honest though, nothing of value was lost. Picture quality isn’t important in this case IMO as long as you can still read the text, and the extra panel and text are meh for this one.

NeatNit,

That’s got like a hundred feet!
I don’t like looking at that one.
Just call it something that means a hundred feet and get it off the screen!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYyiS8AT3ug

NeatNit,

Is this feature common in scripting/interpreted languages? Feels like those two things don’t work together.

NeatNit,

Like most things in life, context matters. In the OP it seems like the check function is used specifically so it could raise a PaymentException if the payment hasn’t been received… That’s not a “forgiveness/permission” context, this is a yes or no question, hence should have been an if.

NeatNit,

This is firmly in the realm of semantic definition that most people don’t need to know IMO, definitely not in casual conversation. Like the precise botanical definition of a nut, ‘true crabs’ vs other kinds of crabs, and other such specialised definitions in various fields of study. For everyday discussion, broad labels are fine. Non-binary, agender, gender-fluid and maybe more that I’m ignorant of can all kinda be used interchangeably in most contexts and I think there’s nothing disrespectful in that. Expecting more is expecting too much.

If talking with one’s therapist about it or in circles where this is a main topic of discussion, yeah precise terms are useful, but outside of that it’s fine to mix them up.

I just felt this needed to be said. I’m absolutely in favour of people like you chiming in with the definition though, in the right context like here.

NeatNit,

Maybe it’s wrong, but do you think everyone in the world should know this? Though fwiw I don’t think gender-fluid is (or should be) used as a generic term for the others, the others feel more generic. I just wouldn’t think it comes from disrespect if someone does.

NeatNit,

It really doesn’t look that way to me.

NeatNit,

Do shrimp jump backwards? I did not know this.

NeatNit,

I will need some context for this, I’m afraid.

NeatNit,

Linux is affected.

NeatNit,

arstechnica.com/…/novel-attack-against-virtually-…

Interestingly, Android is the only operating system that fully immunizes VPN apps from the attack because it doesn’t implement option 121. For all other OSes, there are no complete fixes. When apps run on Linux there’s a setting that minimizes the effects, but even then TunnelVision can be used to exploit a side channel that can be used to de-anonymize destination traffic and perform targeted denial-of-service attacks.

I did not look into that setting that minimises the effect but from the way it’s written it sounds like this isn’t used by default, so by default you’re still vulnerable. Add even if it’s on, there’s still a side vulnerability.

NeatNit,

I think by client you mean the device and operating system, which is correct to my understanding, but it’s confusing because ‘client’ can also mean the VPN client software which is often supplied by the VPN provider, and that’s what I first think when you say client. So with that in mind it sounds like you’re saying “it’s not about the VPN but the VPN software” which obviously comes from the same provider.

I have not looked into it so you probably understand this more than I, but from the sound of it the VPN software can be built to detect, prevent or counteract the exploit even on affected systems? In which case, even though it’s an environment issue it can still be resolved by the VPN provider.

NeatNit,

I have no idea if they are assisting, it’s all baseless conjecture on my part! Sorry if that wasn’t clear, I thought it was

NeatNit,

OpenAI was literally that until it wasn’t

NeatNit,

I didn’t read this all the way through (yet) but it’s excellent so far

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • InstantRegret
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines