@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

agamemnonymous

@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Move fast and break things, I guess. My take away is that the genie isn’t going back in the bottle. Hopefully failing fast and loud gets us through the growing pains quickly, but on an individual level we’d best be vigilant and adapt to the landscape.

Frankly I’d rather these big obvious failures to insidious little hidden ones the conservative path makes. At least now we know to be skeptical. No development path is perfect, if it were more conservative we might get used to taking results at face value, leaving us more vulnerable to that inevitable failure.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

You’re voting third party in a First Past the Post election structure, so you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the specific incarnation of democracy you exist within.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Because one stands a chance of winning, the other does not.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Yes, “we”, consisting of statistically significant factions of the voting population. Campaigns take time and money, neither of which any candidates besides the two front-runners have enough of to be competitive. They’re not gonna ask you who wins, you don’t decide. I don’t see 70 million Americans shifting to anyone else at this stage.

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Is it a paradox to say that driving in circles around a roundabout is pointless because it doesn’t get you anywhere, but driving along the route to a destination does? Driving is driving, does it work or not? Paradox! Smearing food on your belly doesn’t satisfy your hunger, but eating it does. Does food satisfy hunger or not? Paradox!

If we had approval or ranked choice voting, voting third party would accomplish something. Since we have First Past the Past elections, voting third party is as effective as smearing food on your belly or circling a roundabout for hours.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I’m not promoting it either, that doesn’t change the fact that it is what we use. Voting for a candidate that supports RCV doesn’t basically mean that the election you voted for them in becomes retroactively RCV, you act based on what the system is, not what it should be.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

That’s not how the system works. All voting third party does is equivocate approval for the two front runners. Do you approve of the insurrectionist fascist and the neo-liberal equally? Are they exactly the same to you? Do you think they are equally supportive of election reform?

The fascists with minority support only have power because kids who don’t understand the electoral system either abstain from voting, or vote third party. If everyone held their nose and showed up to vote lesser evil, the Republican party would wither away into being a third party themselves and a progressive party could actually gain footing.

Your candidate doesn’t stand a chance precisely because people like you keep pretending the system works differently.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Hows that goin for ya?

Pretty well actually, considering the glacial pace inherent to changing a political landscape. It’s made it onto the ballot in several states, and is used several local and state-wide elections here and there. The Fair Representation Act has been brought to th the floor in 2017, 2019, 2021, and again this year but it hasn’t been voted on yet.

How about if everyone just voted for the candidate that supports ranked choice?

How’s that going for ya? Elected a third party candidate to the presidency yet?

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

The Fair Representation Act has been sponsored by a Democrat every time.

It’s orders of magnitude more probable to get the slim minority you’re talking about to align D than it is to get the overwhelming majority I’m talking about to rally behind the same third party candidate. It’s not even worth comparing, the concept is laughable at best. To even hint at that happening this election is bordering on clinical levels of delusion.

If you want to campaign for your candidate next cycle, be my guest. Start early, organize, fundraise and get the message out. Next cycle. This cycle, you’re dividing the anti-Project-2025 voting bloc. This cycle, you run the very real risk of ensuring there is no next cycle. Remember that.

Greater Idaho movement: 13 counties in eastern Oregon have voted to secede and join Idaho (ktvz.com)

On Tuesday, voters in Crook County passed measure 7-86, which asked voters if they support negotiations to move the Oregon/Idaho border to include Crook County in Idaho. The measure is passing with 53% of the vote, and makes Crook County the 13th county in eastern Oregon to pass a Greater Idaho measure.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

That assumes that the population of these counties is significant compared to the cities though, right? These seem to be the lowest population-density counties in the state.

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

His aesthetic is almost exclusively pale cool blue-tones. Brown skin looks entirely too warm to fit the sickly vibe. Kinda like how someone a couple weeks ago was talking about why you don’t typically see dark skinned people in newspaper comics: it doesn’t read well in black and white, it really only works in Sunday full-colors.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

That doesn’t really look the same as Burton’s general lighting, and that article doesn’t really give a comprehensive answer.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Nether is it incompatible. You’re the one who said he answered it himself, his answer is basically that there’s no point in shoehorning diversity for diversity’s sake.

His cinematographic aesthetic is well established: people look like dreary, desaturated corpses; on several occasions they literally are corpses, or as close as possible. Nightmare Before Christmas, Beetlejuice, Corpse Bride, Dark Shadows, Sleepy Hollow, Sweeney Todd, and Edward Scissorhands are all heavily centered around the dead, dying, undead, or reanimated dead. His films that aren’t explicitly focused on corpses still typically maintain the same corpse-like mood. It’s easier to make pale skinned people look like corpses.

Dude’s not racist, just goth. I dunno why recognizing this has to get twisted into “making excuses” for him. Nothing he said in that interview contradicts anything I said.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Uh, that pop-up is “unpleasant feelings”. Pain, discomfort, bad taste/smell, etc. If you went outside and started eating dirt, your brain would pop-up with “Hey, this tastes yucky, you should stop”

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Individuals having $44 billion to spend is most of the world’s problems

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Bears eat goats and goats eat oats and little lambs eat ivy, a kid’ll eat ivy too, wouldn’t you?

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

First off, this is obviously a sticky topic. Every conversation is controversial and speculative.

Second, I don’t really see a lot of legitimacy to the “gateway” concept. The vast majority of people use some variety of drug (caffeine, alcohol, nicotine), and that doesn’t really reliably predict “harder” drug use. Lots of people use marijuana and that doesn’t reliably predict hard drug use. Obviously, the people who use heroin and meth have probably used cocaine and ketamine, and weed before that, and alcohol/caffeine/nicotine before that, but that’s not really a “gateway” pipeline so much as paying through finer and finer filters. As far as I know, the concept has fallen pretty heavily out of favor with serious researchers.

In light of that perspective, I think you have to consider the goal. Is your goal to punish people, or to reduce the number and severity of victims? Mine is the latter. Personally, I think this sort of thing peels off many more low-level offenders to low-effort outlets than it emboldens to higher-severity outlets. I think this is ultimately a mental-health problem, and zero-tolerance mandatory reporting (while well-meaning) does more harm than good.

I’d rather that those with these kinds of mental issues have 1. the tools to take the edge off in victimless ways 2. safe spaces to discuss these inclinations without fear of incarceration. I think blockading those avenues yields a net increase the number and severity of victims.

This seems like a net benefit, reducing the overall number and severity of actual victims.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Well, spirit phone was 8 years ago. Neil hasn’t done much under the Lemon Demon name since then

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Look, some people just can’t digest it. As you get older, your ability to process mac’n’cheese without dire intestinal consequences drops off substantially. The pros just simply aren’t worth the cons, not by a long shot.

Doesn’t stop me tho

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Lactose

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

There are varieties of mac’n’cheese other than Kraft

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

She was just seventeen, you know what I mean

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines