circuscritic

@circuscritic@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

circuscritic, (edited )

No, he’s saying that national Democracts leverage the black community for votes, and in exchange, repeatedly screw them over - when they manage to remember they exist outside of election cycles.

At least, that’s how I read his comment. It is only partially intelligible.

Trump floats idea of three-term presidency at NRA convention (www.theguardian.com)

Donald Trump flirted with the idea of being president for three terms – a clear violation of the US constitution – during a bombastic speech for the National Rifle Association in which he vowed to reverse gun safety measures green-lighted during the Biden administration....

circuscritic, (edited )

That’s because full auto rifles*, are typically seen as wasting limited ammunition. A modern military unit isn’t likely to encounter a bunched together group of 30-50 soft targets where a full auto rifle would be most effective…unlike a mass shooter indiscriminately targeting a crowded concert.

*Rifles, not machine guns. I’m well aware of the utility of squad machine gunners, talking guns, etc.

circuscritic,

Hey everyone, I have a tiny violin ready to go.

Does anyone have a good cheese to pair with this cop’s whine?

circuscritic, (edited )

“Look, I know Biden actively supports genocide. But if you point that out, then really it is you who is the bigger supporter of genocide. By not supporting Genocide Joe, you are actually a Trump voter.”

Give me a break. Maybe you’re the problem if your satisfied supporting a party who’s political leanings are so flexible that the only metric they cling to is remaining slightly to the left of the GOP, no matter how far to the right that keeps pushing them.

The Democrats are already a center right party. At this rate, when the GOP goes full National Socialist Workers Party, the Democrats will adopt the Tea Party’s politics.

But hey, at least they’ll still be to the left of the GOP, right?

circuscritic, (edited )

No, the reality is that people like you are helping to craft that very future by refusing to stop supporting the Democrats for even a moment.

Even if stopping for that moment is what is needed to turn the party back into a workers party, and not one that is entirely beholden to it’s donor class, because they know the rubes will vote for them no matter what they do.

circuscritic, (edited )

We are only driving in one direction. The GOP keeps their pedal to the floor, while the Democrats have been happy just to ease up the gas a little - but not slam on the brakes.

You’re saying that it’s better to support the Democrats and delay the inevitable arrival at destination Facism.

I’m saying if ever want to hope to flip a bitch, or even just find an off-ramp, the Democratic party has to be retrained on who they respond to. The only way to do that is to make them more responsive to their voters, then to their donors.

When facing down the barrel of the unlimited donations and super PACS of their donor class, the only weapon we have is solidarity in not supporting them, until they learn.

Taking a little medicine now, but with the chance to actually turn this car around, is worth the risk when the other option is just delayed full tilt facism, with occasional letting off the gas for the new Tea Party Democrats, if they aren’t already outlawed by that point.

circuscritic,

You realize that courting the right, and destroying the left, has been the current Democratic party establishments playbook for quite a while already…right?

That was actually part of the Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy. But don’t take my word for it, go read up on their well documented belief that they could give up on rural and bluecollar democrats, and replace them with “moderate GOP voters” from the suburbs.

Hint: it didn’t work.

So… you’re counterpoint is that if I don’t support them, they’ll just keep doing what they’re already doing?

I disagree. They’re behave like that because they can. Because despite their base despising their donor first agenda, the base still turns out for them, more or less.

The only way to correct that, is to retrain them on who’s needs they need to be responsive to. Absent becoming a billionaire who supports the 99%, the only way is to not support them, and be vocal about why.

circuscritic, (edited )

Vote for whoever you want.

My responses were directed at people commenting, unprompted, about how anyone who doesn’t support Biden, or buy into his campaign messaging, are either closeted Trump supporters, tankies, or (my personal favorite) foreign socket puppet accounts i.e. Russian bots.

Because obviously they can’t be lifelong Democrats who are fed up with current Democratic establishment and see the threat they pose if left unchanged - precisely because we NEED an actual strong leftwing workers party to stand against the GOP.

So, again, you do whatever your conscience tells you.

If your comfortable with a Democratic party that is already fully run by neoliberals, crushes leftists, and only moves further to the right each election, then keep supporting them. That’s on you.

Myself, I am going to see which option the Democrats are MOST concerned with i.e. uncommitted vs blank vs a specific 3rd party candidate.

I will also continue to support most of my local and statewide progressive candidates, because I do care, and I’m not whatever fantasy the Biden supporters have concocted so they can dismiss people like me without giving these idea any real thought.

circuscritic, (edited )

You mean vote in the Presidential primary that the DNC cancelled this year?

Or did you mean, ignore that they cancelled it, and just vote for Biden like a good little lemming?

Don’t be so hysterical. Trump is bad, and I’m under no illusion what another term of his would be like, but he’s far too stupid and petty to “end democracy”, the Democrats are doing fine at doing that themselves.

I’m not some young radical. I’ve been through many cycles, and I’ve worked on more campaigns then most of people have voted in.

And yes, I’ve worked inside the DNC apparatus and been around contemporary Democratic machine politics nearly my entire life. I have a pretty good idea of what these people are like, because I’ve known a whole lot of them.

circuscritic,

Well, considering that he lost then, and then lost again the same way 4 years later, he’s not really the benchmark of effective political strategy that you’re acting like he is.

circuscritic, (edited )

washingtonpost.com/…/biden-primaries-unchallenged…

Yes, they effectively rigged the Presidential primary this cycle for Biden. It wasn’t really a secret, was widely covered, and if you aren’t aware of that, I don’t think you’re informed enough to even have this conversation.

I genuinely don’t care if you believe me. It wasn’t an appeal to authority to get you to change your mind. It was in response to your patronizing “I used to be like you” schtick.

I never said don’t vote, not once. I haven’t even appealed to others to follow my lead in not supporting Biden.

I have laid out some of my reasons for not supporting Biden, and that is what you find so offensive.

“The lesser of two evils” game will never end. That is the fire, that is how we got Trump in the first place. Continuing to breath life into the existing DNC isn’t going to put it out, it’s just going to fan the flames.

Wake up and smell smoke.

circuscritic, (edited )

I’m guessing you would have/did vote for him though. Good luck with your strategy of not even playing the same game

…what? No, seriously, I’m usually pretty good at deciphering gibberish, but I think I need some clarification here…

I understand the part where you’re calling me a Bernie voter, and intending that as insult.

But I’m not clear on the part about me not playing the same game as a sitting senator, and former presidential candidate… because of course I’m not…

Am I supposed to be? If so, how?

circuscritic, (edited )

What super secret strategy? I’ve laid out my very simple belief on the matter, repeatedly, and on a public forum.

If my vote isn’t a big deal, than why are you devoting so much time trying to convince me otherwise?

I never said don’t vote. I’ve said I won’t support the establishment DNC, or Biden, but that I will continue to support progressive/left candidates who would be beholden to voters, and not special interests/machine politics.

Compromise to what end? That is what you’re not understanding. When in the last 30 years has that not lead to us being worse off?

I get it, you’re happy to manage our decline into a full blown neoliberal gilded age 2.0 hellscape, on the off chance that it helps to staves off full blown fascism. I’m not judging you for making that choice, but I do disagree with it.

I don’t see how the unending shifting of the Democratic party to the right, just to remain slightly to the left the GOP, doesn’t end up with the exact situation you’re trying to fend off.

So, as I said, I’m going to use the only voice I have, my vote, to support the only viable path that might prevent the outcome that you claim you’re trying to avoid, but really, are just easing into a bit more gently.

circuscritic, (edited )

I don’t know about your locality, but I’ve never lived in a state where a Presidential general election ballot doesn’t have a whole lot of other races and ballot initiatives on it…

I don’t see how my not supporting Biden, or the establishment DNC candidates, somehow prevents me from voting for school bonds, local progressive grassroots candidates, or any other measures and races on the ballot this year.

So…good for you, vote your conscience, and I’ll vote mine.

circuscritic, (edited )

As opposed to you, and the others like you, who are demanding that anyone who voices dissent and discontent must still vote for Biden, and to do otherwise means we’re actually a combination of Trump supporting tankies who run socket puppet accounts for Russia, who really want the country to continue sliding towards fascim.

So yeah, I understand your position just fine.

circuscritic, (edited )

You’re technically correct, but only because the DNC drinks from the same neoliberal Kool Aid. The apparatus is now mostly run from their bloated privatized consultant class (campaign consultants, media firms, polling outfits, etc.).

Of which, I’m sorry to say, I have spent time both employed by personally, as well as many years in close proximity to, outside of my own direct professional engagement.

I love how, on Lemmy, you think that it’s more likely that I’m actually a deep cover foreign asset, then a citizen who’s happened to have worked in the disgustingly large multi-billion dollar campaign industry.

But please, tell me more about how your intimate knowledge of our body politic is more nuanced and insightful then mine.

You call me angry and disgruntled, but your political philosophy is “I’ll compromise on literally anything, as long as I’m told it’s for the greater good”.

Trump would be awful, but he’s not the end of the line of awful candidates and I’d rather take my chances with a DNC that is responsive to it’s base, and not it’s donors. That can’t happen unless they fear their base will pull support, which is why they’ve trained them to always compromise.

Isn’t it funny though, that the compromise only works in one direction: to the right and for the benefit of the donor class.

circuscritic, (edited )

… providing psychotropic chemicals to children, en masse, and without the knowledge or permission of their parents.

Yeah, you’re right, definitely no laws against that and clearly there’s no possible risk of harm.

circuscritic, (edited )

No, they don’t. It’s considered a dietary supplement, which thanks to the Supplement lobby is notoriously unregulated.

And FWIW I don’t think that you pointing out how special interests lobbies have created any entire industry built on the manufacturering and mass marketing of unregulated supplements and chemicals somehow supports the idea that their safe for kids to consume, or to be dosed with by unlicensed daycare workers.

circuscritic,

A point you supported by saying melatonin was considered a food, or food additive, which it’s not.

It is legally considered a supplement, which are not FDA regulated, and because it’s used to alter a persons mind and behavior, it is a psychotropic.

So are you saying it’s not, or shouldn’t be, illegal for unlicensed daycare workers to secretly dose children’s food with unregulated psychotropic supplements?

circuscritic, (edited )

She is basically the Koch brothers, but bigger, dumber, and more evil.

The only reason why the Koch family is probably worse, is because their influence flows through the American state.

All this is to say, it’s a good bet that after this story dies down, the gallery will quietly acquiesce and take down the painting. This will either be followed by a carrot, or a removal of whatever stick she used.

circuscritic, (edited )

Nah, I respected Thomas for never asking questions.

He was the only one of the nine justices, who for so long, didn’t pretend that his mind wasn’t already made up, or that there was an answer a lawyer could give that would change his predetermined ruling.

He knew what the assignment was, and fuck if he was going to waste any more time then necessary.

circuscritic,

They know it has. Think of this like when a porn studio uploads their own films to a torrent site, and then goes after people who download them.

Except, in this case, everyone involved are terrible human beings. So… while I will never cheer for Sony Music, I will happily root against all the AI/tech companies they go after for scraping their catalogues.

https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/e2ac164a-fcfb-4765-96a7-ceb9eaba0383.jpeg

circuscritic, (edited )

Can’t speak to the first part, it’s definitely possible, but what I’m going to say next makes it less likely.

They were likely never his billions. He was most likey a cutout, used by various intelligence agencies. Both as a source of blackmail material/asset development, as well as a means to move money around, off books.

The guy was a legit idiot and was, ironically, groomed by powerful men to be inserted into his “life” as an “investor”.*

*These parts aren’t conjecture, or opinion. His lack of intelligence is well documented, as is how he was placed on the path of being an “investor” for the ultra wealthy and powerful.

circuscritic, (edited )

Awesome. Truly spectacular.

Generative AI is so energy intensive ($$$), that Google is requiring users subscribe to Gemini.

Google is entirely dependent on advertising sales. Ad revenue subsidizes literally everything else, from Android development to whichever 8-12 products and services they launch and subsequently cancel each year.

Now, Google wants to remove web results and just use generative AI instead of search as it’s default user interface.

So, like I said: Awesome.

circuscritic, (edited )

Not applicable to that specific post as they obviously went the extra mile in layering an exaggerated and moronic take with additional hyperbole.

The fact that they had to edit in and add an explicit “/s” is an indictment of the mental capacity of those who down voted it, not OP, and definitely not indicative of Poe’s Law.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • modclub
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • tester
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines