@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

dahukanna

@dahukanna@mastodon.social

Software Alchemist - Turning base code into precious applications. Devsigner == 'Dev'eloper + De'signer'. Married to https://mstdn.social/@Anni ❤️ 🏳️‍🌈. Pronouns == she/her.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

hrefna, to random
@hrefna@hachyderm.io avatar

Thinking out loud: part of my thinking in how I am approaching is what I started thinking of as the "boids model" of federated software development.

"But Hrefna, I sure as hell didn't hear about the 'boids model' in my SE classes"

Yes, this is just kind of my own colloquial thinking about it.

For those who are unaware, boids is an artificial life simulator based around the flocking behavior of birds. The idea is that we can simulate general flocking with a few basic rules.

1/

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@hrefna

Nice one!

Similarly, when I see duality characteristics and there isn’t an existing software model that provides architecture blueprint for what I need to “build”, usually fall back to physics of light or flow dynamics as first principles and work up principles, heuristics and rules from there.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@smallcircles @hrefna

Similar to Design patterns and software architecture/blueprinting?

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@smallcircles @hrefna

This is what UX/Content/Information designers call “Information Architecture”

Favorite and accessible book on this by Abby Covert, “How to make@sense of any mess” - https://www.howtomakesenseofanymess.com/

hrefna, (edited ) to random
@hrefna@hachyderm.io avatar

Very tired of seeing takes like:

"The reason you are struggling is because you aren't familiar with social media applications."

or

"You are struggling because the problem space is complicated."

Like, just give people a glimmer of credit, please.

I'm not saying that I'm all that, but this isn't always to me, it is to a lot of people who have genuine concerns and at a minimum are being mislead by the documentation in the space.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@hrefna

> “The reason you are struggling is because you aren't familiar with social media applications."

What does that mean exactly?

Social media is “rocket science”, quantum physics or some such?

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

interaction design syllabus idea :

ask people to think of all the things they do via apps, computers, add a -ing to it & think how an interface is contributing to them doing those activities in a certain way.

organized around daily mundane social practices and needs and common life events

Like a bottom approach to teaching redesigning social practices

Supplementing it with deconstructing UI metaphors

https://issuu.com/instituteofnetworkcultures/docs/tod14-binnenwerk-def-pdf

image/png
image/png
image/png

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @stephenpa

Need to review. Wearing software architecture hat, I’d like to see how this complements, for example C4 model - https://c4model.com/ or Domain Driven Design (DDD) - https://martinfowler.com/bliki/DomainDrivenDesign.html

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

Perfectly captures standard pedagogy followed in Indian education system : Plug and Chug, Cram and Flush

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-46951-1_13#Sec3

Plug and Chug, Cram and Flush by David A. Bella
https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%291052-3928%282003%29129%3A1%2832%29

Characterisation of an engineering paradigm as ‘plug and chug’ and ‘cram and flush’

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology
If “Plug+chug, cram+flush” had been applied to food+ nutrition, it sounds pathological and maladaptive, like an eating disorder.

It is devoid of nurture, sustaining and meaningful existence. That cannot be the function of education - the system of teaching knowledge and acquiring that knowledge.

How is that “life sustaining” adaptation?

maaretp, to random
@maaretp@mas.to avatar

There's a generational change story unfolding with testers. Those who don't program are being replaced by those who do. Those who program only with "Robot Framework keywords" are next generation to replace. Skip languages specifically done for testing and learn programming with general purpose languages.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@gdinwiddie @maaretp

So 3 circle ven diagram becomes one.

Alt:
3 circle ven diagram for software artifact in 2020 becomes one circle with only code in 2025

dahukanna, to random
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

When someone says, “make it easy to do …”, what they mean is, “make it match/align with my current mental model/perspective/expectation” I.e. their “map”, regardless of the existing, actual territory.

Bias is “misapplication” of individual & collective socio-cultural maps & refusing to update them.

The worst map, often used in key decision making is the “assumption” - A statement (map) taken as true (territory), without proof. Think about that, “map” accepted as “territory”, without proof!

jonny, to random
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

LLM-generated bug bounty manipulation, yet another demonstration of the fact that the space of "good" uses of LLMs for programming is very small compared to the vast ocean of adversarial uses. The tab is being called on all the technical debt we've accumulated in our systems of trust, and the high cost of "openness" without trust gets clearer every day.

https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2024/01/02/the-i-in-llm-stands-for-intelligence/

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@jonny

I love the metaphor - LLMs are “seismic quakes” across societal “trust fault lines“.

We built “openness” mansions on trust “tectonic plates” and surprised that they are crumbling under the pressure of the use of LLMs.

LLMs on their own are a technology. It’s people who make them and use them.

grimalkina, to random
@grimalkina@mastodon.social avatar

You can't talk about gender when studying a field with massively enormous gender effects! You can't ask for constructs to be empirically validated! You must accept 20 person qualitative samples as speaking to a population of literally millions! You can't cite theory from psychology when talking about human beings and their psychology! So much software research is so deeply and unbelievably unserious.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@grimalkina @danilo

> “So much software research is so deeply and unbelievably unserious.”

I.Am. Dying!

Laughing my ass off - LMAO

dahukanna, to random
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology - related to your question of alternative pedagogy. How to world build by gathering - https://www.chasejarvis.com/blog/how-to-transform-your-meetings-with-priya-parkers-the-art-of-gathering/

being, to random
@being@social.ornella.xyz avatar

I'm realizing now that one of the biggest, and most underestimated, cultural differences is how much each culture appreciates context. I find that Ghanaian culture, like Burkinabè, uses a lot of context. E.g., if you are saying a restaurant will be closed because you saw it on Google maps, you might go "is Google maps accurate on opening times? (Pause for response). I just checked the restaurant we're going to. (Pause for question). It says it closes at 5. (Pause for realization). Yes, it's 6."

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@kevinteljeur @being

Ha ha ha ha. “I know the owner. They’ll open up the kitchen when I ask” - 😉

dahukanna, to random
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

I keep seeing people state they switched their browser from “implementation A” to “implementation B” - not naming names as that’s not required..

I use, on the daily:

  1. Firefox for developers, Firefox nightly and Firefox.
  2. Safari - MacOS 12,14 and IOS 11,15,17
  3. Chrome/Edge/Vivaldi, etc.

Curious question: What’s the reason for only limiting use to one specific browser implementation?

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@kevinteljeur

Interesting … so your digital/web separation boundary is character-based with backup for “only chrome aka IE6” sites.

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

Limits of Reductionism from the book

Introduction to Psychoneuroimmunology by Jorge H. Daruna, 2nd Edition https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123820495/introduction-to-psychoneuroimmunology#book-description

"Recognition that complexity cannot be avoided by progressively narrowing focus, a notion that has been dubbed ‘‘self-similarity’’ by chaos theorists"

"along with the observation that a specific influence can act to inhibit or excite a given process depending on the mix of other concurrent influences, have profound implications for research"

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology

Agreed. A great starting point metaphor/analogy but not the conclusion. It sooo shortsighted and blinkered.

Empirical experiment observed results only capture a point in time - a (wire)frame.

Not tracking/accounting for the passage of time (4th dimension) is applying classical physics observation in a quantum physics context.

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

What is one causal determinant that you think can make a person somewhat immune to bigotry?

It certainly isn't education, wealth, class or advanced degrees because I constantly see the most bigoted vile takes by folks with ivy league credentials

Is there perhaps any dehuminization study that examines how sometimes the processes of formal education and meeting its benchmarks for excellence and expertise don't include practices to develop morally

https://mastodon.social/@impactology/111436492042641388

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology thanks for starting and having this conversation in the open. Most of this stuff never leaves the confines of our bodies.

grimalkina, to random
@grimalkina@mastodon.social avatar

Just to continue on my beat of troubling narratives of achievement & cognition... mind-blowing to consider recent points made about social cognition and the flip of our deficit narratives

Let me try to put this in non-jargon terms. For years, it's been claimed on "classic" cognition tasks that lower social class (broadly speaking) predicts worse performance.

But what happens when you look at social cognition tasks that are thought to rely on the same core factors (like working memory)?

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@grimalkina

> how a history of minor group differences on highly selected cognitive tasks represent some "natural" division of ability that he takes to be predictive of all work possible in a domain.

Why does circumstantial, point in time snapshot, judgmental, mutually exclusive subset logic, instead of inclusive union set logic almost always get applied to grouping & classification of human behavior?

Point of wonder: Each person has multiple, unique finger tip whorls.

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

I was reflecting on why do I have this need of seeking folks with unconventional, non-traditional life trajectories, folks who are rebellious, inquisitive and carved out a niche for themselves, by themselves. Folks who not only stood their ground and rebelled but also made something for themselves and I think it’s about courage.

I’ve realized I get along really well with folks who experienced lot of friction in life & after experiencing had to make out something original, independently.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @stephenpa

Those evidentiary blocks are from the study of biochemistry.
I used the word building blocks to indicate that these biochemical substances are what remain as evidence but may not be causal e.g. we can’t see wind speed but we know it’s high if we can “hear(signal)” the aural after effects. I would reword as “evidentiary signals”.
It’s generally accepted that endorphins “signal” pleasure response. Why? Because they show up at a certain concentration for specific activity.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @stephenpa

> the premise is that our society is hardwired in our brain
No, I’m not suggesting that at all.

Our lived experience is influenced & constrained by capabilities of our bodies. Some of that experience is generational & passed to us encoded in our DNA that interacts with an entire system of automation e.g. breathing, sensory detection, processing and reaction, hormonal pathways like endocrine, digestive, circulatory, neural and other systems that keep us alive.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @stephenpa

2- The brain is a member of the neural sub-system the also comprises the sensory organ nerves, autonomous nervous system and hormonal chemicals. All of these are influenced by inherited DNA as a foundation.

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @stephenpa

No worries. It was an insightful conversation and exchange of perspectives.

A majority of foundational statistics and psychology is eugenics based from a philosophical point of view(perspective). So this conversation is a useful inflection point (dissent).

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @stephenpa

> Good thing that there is epigenetics & notion of neuroplasticity allowing for the iterateability of our inherited capabilities :D
> Epigenetics: considers how genes can be switched on and off via environmental, lifestyle factors.

This has always been “epigenetics” otherwise there would be no adaptability. DNA codifies reinforced & repeated lived experience. What activates the code depends on context & circumstances e.g. being born activates autonomous nervous system.

tdpauw, to random
@tdpauw@mastodon.social avatar

One more time 😉

Feature Branching is Evil 💪

Where: online at the Agile Alliance Tech Talks
When: next week, Wednesday, Jan 10th at 10 am ET (that should be 4 pm CET according to my calendar 🤷‍♂️ )

https://www.agilealliance.org/event/feature-branching-is-evil/

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@tdpauw @lisihocke

Thanks for the clarification. I agree that feature branches are not a panacea.

impactology, (edited ) to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar
dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar
vaurora, to random
@vaurora@wandering.shop avatar

This website is extremely funny but also a good lesson in web surveillance. Visit it from a desktop browser, sound on, trust me

https://clickclickclick.click/

dahukanna,
@dahukanna@mastodon.social avatar

@impactology @vaurora @missmythreyi @PropCazhPM @stephenpa

I lasted for the second 30 sec block I.e. 1 minute of inactivity. I was on mobile and did not hear anything. Was I supposed to do something else?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • everett
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines