davidgro

@davidgro@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

davidgro,

Pretty much so is the author of the article.

davidgro,

I believe true AI might in fact be an extinction risk. Not likely, but not impossible. It would have to end up self-improving and wildly outclass us, then could be a threat.

Of course the fancy autocomplete systems we have now are in no way true AI.

davidgro,

In your case that was a motor control issue, not a flaw in reasoning. In the LLM case it’s a pure implementation of a Chinese Room and the “book and pencils” (weights) semi-randomly generate text that causes humans to experience textual pareidolia more often than not.

It can be useful - that book is very large, and contains a lot of residue of valid information and patterns, but the way it works is not how intelligence works (still an open question of course, but ‘not that way’ is quite clear.)

This is not to say that true AI is impossible - I believe it is possible, but it will have to be implemented differently. At the very least, it will need the ability to self-modify in real time (learning)

davidgro,

What would convince me that we may be on the right path: Besides huge improvements in reasoning, it would (like I mentioned) need to be able to learn - and not just track previous text, I mean permanently adding or adjusting the weights (or equivalent) of the model.

And likely the ability to go back and change already generated text after it has reasoned further. Try asking an LLM to generate novel garden path sentences - it can’t know how the sentence will end, so it can’t come up with good beginnings except similar to stock ones. (That said it’s not a skill I personally have either, but humans can do it certainly.)

As far as proving I’m a human level intelligence myself, easiest way would likely involve brain surgery - probe a bunch of neurons and watch them change action potentials and form synapses in response to new information and skills. But short of that, at the current state of the art I can prove it by stating confidently that Samantha has 1 sister. (Note: that thread was a reply to someone else, but I’m watching the whole article’s comments)

davidgro,

An interesting criteria, why does going back to edit (instead of correcting itself mid-stream)

I suppose those would be equivalent, I just haven’t seen it done (at least not properly) - the example you posted earlier with the siblings for example was showing how it could only append more text and not actually produce corrections.

Couldn’t you perform this test on any animal with a discrete brain?

Oh, right. Animals do exist. It simply hadn’t occurred to me at that moment, even though there is one right next to me taking a nap. However a lot of them are capable of more rational thought than LLMs are. Even bees can count reasonably well. Anyway, defining human level intelligence is a hard problem. Determining it is even harder, but I still say it’s feasible to say some things aren’t it.

[Garden path sentences]

No good. The difference between a good garden path and simple ambiguity is that the ‘most likely’ interpretation when the reader is halfway down the sentence turns out to be ungrammatical or nonsense by the end. The way LLMs work, they don’t like to put words together in an order that they don’t usually occur, even if in the end there’s a way to interpret it to make sense.

The example it made with the keys is particularly bad because the two meanings are nearly identical anyway.

Just for fun I’ll try to make one here:

“After dealing with the asbestos, I was asked to lead paint removal.”

Might not work, the meaningful interpretation could be too obvious compared to the toxic metal, but it has the right structure.

davidgro,

I gotta go for now, but one quick note:

“While the man hunted the deer ran into the forest”

Actually looked too good to be an original creation from an LLM to me, and sure enough it’s not. (About half way down)
I was actually looking up the one about the horse when I found that page.

davidgro,

This account. On a large instance that I don’t own. Not ideal in a pure sense, but the admins and mods do a lot of work that I don’t want to do, so I’m fine with it.

davidgro,

I know that song!

/s

Seriously though, nice image.

davidgro,

There will most certainly still be wasps and mosquitoes.

davidgro,

I wonder what historical events happened on the 2024th of March, year 00.

davidgro,

To make sure it doesn’t go public, because they are in it.

davidgro,

I think this might be the first of these I’ve seen where pretty much all the comments are just agreement.

davidgro,

Much of the same could be said of the EmDrive. This is one of those extraordinary claims which requires extraordinary evidence, especially given the recent history of the topic.

davidgro,

It will disappear when nobody else can replicate and it becomes clear that it never really worked to begin with.

davidgro,

I have a much more lighthearted answer.

This post contains some spoilers, but I consider it outside the statute of limitations for such things.

There’s this old movie where aliens are concerned about humanity developing a weapon that if used would Destroy the universe.

So the aliens use a really stupid plan to try and convince us to stop. And I guess this was after 8 other ideas either failed or were considered even worse.

Anyway at the end (of course) humanity wins and drives off the aliens. Wait, what was the aliens’ original goal? Something about the universe? Oh well, must not be important… The End.

And that was Plan 9 from Outer Space.

If you could take a single character out of a piece of media (book, film, TV show, video game, etc) who would it be?

They would lose any magical powers they may have had in the book, but anything they are, rather than can do, will stay. For example people from the His Dark Materials world would keep their daemons. You can take them out at any time in the story’s plot, but for all other people consuming the media, it will be shown that the...

davidgro,

Great answer… But now you’ve caused God to actually exist IRL!

davidgro,

Such a profound quote… About losing a video game.

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • davidgro, (edited )

    It would be ridiculous to say that All Star is from Shrek.

    It’s from Mystery Men.

    (Only partly /s. Especially given the music video)

    davidgro,

    So basically an office suite? Like Google Docs or MS Office?

    davidgro, (edited )

    As far as Windows goes, 95 was actually version 4.00.950 for the first version.

    98 was 4.1, 2000 was 5.0, XP 5.1, Vista 6.0, 7 was 6.1, 8 was 6.2, 8.1 = 6.3

    Then they jumped to 10 in both the name and internal version.

    Windows 11 is still 10.0.x though.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • ngwrru68w68
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • DreamBathrooms
  • PowerRangers
  • Leos
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • vwfavf
  • tester
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • All magazines