This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

I just wanted to say, I can’t drink, my liver doesn’t process it right so I start projectile vomiting almost immediately, but I see these posts on my “All” feed from time to time, and I really admire anyone who has the wherewithall to do this and keep doing it!

Keep at it my friends! It’s worth it! It’s not EASY, but if it were easy, everyone would do it!

getsunset.com/blogs/news/aldh2-deficiency

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

“According to what Mike Johnson said…”

So, yeah, this article can be safely ignored.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Remind me again who’s been caught raping all the kids?

…wikipedia.org/…/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cas…

Oh, yeah… riiight…

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Remind me again who’s been caught raping all the kids?

…wikipedia.org/…/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cas…

Oh, yeah… riiight…

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Coming up on Summer movie season, might be good to have a release calendar and a weekly “What’s new this week” thread.

Happy to contribute, but I mod enough already. :) I don’t want to be “that guy” with a ton of communities. LOL.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

They were OK before the ruling too so long as there’s an ® behind the name.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

If it were political, then Michael Cohen wouldn’t have been prosecuted and imprisoned for the same crime, in which Donald Trump was “Individual 1”.

That was 2018, who was President in 2018? 🤔

jordanlund, (edited )
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

"65 percent of Americans who are considered “middle class,” earning above 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), are in a financial struggle. "

That sounds more like a problem with the definition of the federal poverty level than it is a problem with the middle class.

If you’re struggling, you aren’t middle class.

Federal Poverty Level for 2024 is dependent on household size:

medicaidplanningassistance.org/federal-poverty-gu…

Oh, man, now I have to see if Lemmy can do tables… Hmmm nope!

Size - 100% - 200%
1 - $15,060 - $30,120
2 - $20,440 - $40,880
3 - $25,820 - $51,640
4 - $31,200 - $62,400
5 - $36,580 - $73,160
6 - $41,960 - $83,920
7 - $47,340 - $94,680
8 - $52,720 - $105,440
Each person over 8, add $5,380 - $10,760

So let’s take the prototypical nuclear family, 2 parents, 2 kids.

$62,400 is 200% poverty. I could see that being a struggle. I think maybe what we need is to re-define the poverty level.

Size - 100% - 200%
1 - $31,200 - $62,400
2 - $36,580 - $73,160
3 - $41,960 - $83,920
4 - $47,340 - $94,680
5 - $52,720 - $105,440
6 - $58,100 - $116,200
7 - $63,480 - $126,960
8 - $68,860 - $137,720
Each person over 8, add $5,380 - $10,760

jordanlund, (edited )
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Generally, the left is anti-death penalty so I’d expect something along the lines of life in prison, revoke citizenship, deportation.

But, removed as this community is articles only. You want asklemmy. :)

jordanlund, (edited )
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

I mean, the ATF form isn’t really ambiguous and that’s what got Hunter in trouble.

For those who have never purchased a gun in the US, here are the questions you have to answer, lying here not only disqualifies you, it’s a felony:

Line 21:

“a. Are you the actual transferee/buyer of all of the firearm(s) listed on this form and any continuation sheet(s) (ATF Form 5300.9A)? Warning: You are not the actual transferee/buyer if you are acquiring any of the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not the actual transferee/buyer, the licensee cannot transfer any of the firearm(s) to you. Exception: If you are only picking up a repaired firearm(s) for another person, you are not required to answer 21.a. and may proceed to question 21.b.”

21a is one of the things that got the Crumbleys in trouble. They SAID they bought the gun for themselves when they bought it for their kid who legally could not own a pistol. That’s called a “straw purchase”. But, it’s rarely charged, and was not charged in the Crumbley case.

fox2detroit.com/…/ethan-crumbley-says-he-gave-jam…

“b. Do you intend to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm listed on this form and any continuation sheet(s) in furtherance of any felony or other offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of more than one year, a Federal crime of terrorism, or a drug trafficking offense?”

“c. Are you under indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could imprison you for more than one year, or are you a current member of the military who has been charged with violation(s) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whose charge(s) have been referred to a general court-martial?”

Currently blocking Trump from owning a gun.

“d. Have you ever been convicted in any court, including a military court, of a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could have imprisoned you for more than one year, even if you received a shorter sentence including probation?”

Also currently blocking Trump from owning a gun.

“e. Are you a fugitive from justice?”

“f. Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.”

This is what they’re charging Hunter with. He answered “No.” here. The argument in defense is that he was not actively using or addicted at the exact moment he filled out the form, but that argument, to my knowledge, has never actually been tested in court. It’s also, like 21a, rarely prosecuted.

“g. Have you ever been adjudicated as a mental defective OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?”

This is the #1 line that mass shooters answer “no” to and it passes their background check. The key phrase is “adjuducated as a mental defective.” In other words “has a judge declared you…”

In most cases, an involuntary mental health hold didn’t go through a judge and as such is not part of a background check.

“h. Have you ever been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions?”

“i. Are you subject to a court order, including a Military Protection Order issued by a military judge or magistrate, restraining you from harassing, stalking, or threatening your child or an intimate partner or child of such partner?”

“j. Have you ever been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, or are you or have you ever been a member of the military and been convicted of a crime that included, as an element, the use of force against a person as identified in the instructions?”

“k. Have you ever renounced your United States citizenship?”

“l. Are you an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States?”

“m.1. Are you an alien who has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa?

m.2. If you answered “Yes” to question 21.m.1, do you fall within any of the exceptions stated in the instructions?”

“n. Do you intend to sell or dispose of any firearm(s) listed on this form or any continuation sheet(s) to any person described in questions 21(b)-(l) or to a person described in question 21.m.1 who does not fall within a nonimmigrant alien exception?”

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

IIRC they haven’t actually ruled on that but the ruling is due this month.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

I agree with the sentiment, but video links are not allowed. Re-submit the actual article itself.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

“A level 4 autonomous vehicle will be for sale in the US to ordinary customers (80 percent)”

When this becomes universally adopted, it’s going to have a bigger impact than anyone thinks.

Cities now derive revenue from traffic fines, parking fines, parking fees, and so on.

Level 4 autonomous vehicles are going to obviate ALL of that which means cities are going to lose more and more revenue as they become adopted.

And nobody is thinking about how to replace that revenue.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Yup, back when I had to go to an office I was paying $21 a day to park. 5 days a week.

With an autonomous car I could have it drop me off, drive back home, then pick me up based on my cell phone location on demand.

Yeah, I’d double my gas usage during the week, but I guarantee it would be less than $105.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

It would double traffic, but only 1/2 of it would be user occupied.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Set it up as Uber/Lyft and make money while you make money. :)

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Yup. Autonomous vehicles means re-claiming space now used for parking.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Either that or downtown cores will be toll gated.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

“An increase in the 12.4 percent Social Security payroll tax of 3.5 percentage points — half borne by employers and half by employees — is all that’s needed to keep full Social Security benefits flowing in the 2030s and beyond, Professor Munnell explained in a telephone conversation.”

You don’t have to increase the percentage with-held AT ALL.

The 12.4% payroll tax only applies to the first $168,600 of earned income.

Source: www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751

So what you do is eliminate that cap, like we ALREADY do for the Medicare tax.

In fact, if you removed the cap AND applied the tax to other forms of income, such as capital gains, we could probably reduce the percentage and bring in more money.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Or the time before that, or the time before that…

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen my co-workers borderline suicidal because their 401K tanked.

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

How many had their choice made for them before they even had a chance to vote in a primary?

Nikki Haley was the last to drop out on March 6th, when there were still dozens of primaries to go.

I’d love to see a national primary. But people complain… But… but… it’s not fair to small candidates who can’t run a national campaign…

Yeah, if you can’t run a national campaign, you have no business being President either.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines