ريال مدريد يؤخر التحاق إبراهيم دياز بالمنتخب المغربي
سيُجبر النجم المغربي إبراهيم دياز لاعب ريال مدريد الإسباني على التأخر في الالتحاق بالمعسكر القادم لأسود الأطلس، بسبب مشاركته في نهائي دوري أبطال أوروبا بين الفريق الملكي وبوروسيا دورتموند الألماني في 1 يونيو القادم.
ويُعد إبراهيم دياز من أبرز النجوم الذين يُراهن عليهم منتخب المغرب مُستقبلًا، بعدما نجح في استقطابه من منتخب إسبانيا الذي كان قريبًا من تمثيله.
إعلان
ومن المحتمل أن يكون دياز آخر الملتحقين بمعسكر “أسود الأطلس”، وقد تواصل مع وليد الركراكي المدير الفني للمنتخب المغربي حول الموضوع، وسيحظى بمساندة جميع زملائه في الكتيبة المغربية الذين يتمنون تتويجه باللقب الأوروبي.
وحدد وليد الركراكي تاريخ 1 يونيو موعدًا لالتحاق لاعبي منتخب المغرب بالمعسكر الإعدادي القادم بمركز محمد السادس لكرة القدم، استعدادًا لمواجهتي زامبيا والكونغو برازافيل برسم الجولتين الثالثة والرابعة من التصفيات الأفريقية المؤهلة إلى مونديال 2026.
وأشاد كارلو أنشيلوتي مدرب فريق ريال مدريد بالنجم المغربي إبراهيم دياز، بعد نهاية المواجهة التي جمعت “الملكي” بمضيفه 4-4؛ وذلك بقوله في المؤتمر الصحفي الذي أعقب اللقاء: “إبراهيم دياز قدّم موسمًا جيدًا للغاية، وساعدنا كثيرًا، هو وخوسيلو وأردا غولر كذلك”.
وكان المدرب أنشيلوتي وراء عودة إبراهيم دياز إلى ريال مدريد هذا الموسم، بعدما لعب الموسمين الماضيين بنظام الإعارة مع نادي ميلان، ويمتد عقد الدولي المغربي إلى غاية صيف 2027 برفقة الفريق “الملكي”، ومن المرجح أن تجدد إدارة الرئيس فلورنتينو بيريز عقده بسبب تألقه خلال الموسم الجاري.
وأَثْبَتَ دياز فاعليته وبأنه “جوكر” حقيقي في يد المدرب أنشيلوتي، سواء لعب أساسيًا أو احتياطيًا في تشكيل ريال مدريد خلال الموسم الحالي 2023-24، حيث أسهم في تسجيل ناديه 21 هدفًا، بتسجيله 12 هدفًا وتقديمه تسع تمريرات حاسمة بعد مشاركته في 23 مباراة أساسيًا و21 احتياطيًا، استنادًا إلى بيانات موقع “ترانسفير ماركت” المتخصص في الأرقام والإحصاءات.
Dear @firefox : Please stop saving images as webp when I drag them out of the browser. Forever stop that. Even if they are webp originally, just give me a setting to auto-convert them to JPEG. When I get a webp file the first thing I have to do is convert it manually if I'm going to do anything with it.
Why? PNG is good enough today, so everything moving to jxl isn’t particularly urgent for me. AVIF is probably a better option in terms of platform support vs jxl.
But yeah, when it’s ubiquitous, it’ll be cool I guess.
I can’t get over how cool it is to view my posts from any server. I’m definitely going to use activitypub for my social media I’m planning on making. I was going to use @Discourse , but considering it’s like #GitLab where you are only able to self host and each instance of discourse can’t interconnect makes me kinda sad. But activitypub seems like the only way I feel happy in both ways.
What’s that about Gitlab? I use it hosted, and it can be self-hosted, so I’m not sure what the issue is.
Honestly, I don’t find a lot of value in the fediverse generally. I guess it’s kinda cool that things connect together, but URLs also get the job done pretty well, and cookies and password managers handle logins and stuff between platforms. The real value is in being an alternative to the big, centralized services.
I’m not here because of the fediverse, I’m here because Reddit pissed me off almost a year ago and this is a suitable-enough replacement. Seeing my posts on other platforms is honestly a little odd (in theory) because having a post from one context (say lemmy) appear in another (say git hosting) is often not wanted. So I want separation between different types of social media (e.g. I avoid Mastodon because I don’t like that form), not more sharing. But that’s not a real concern, it’s just not why I use it.
That said, I have no idea what kind of social media project you’re working on, so maybe federation is the perfect fit. The fediverse is certainly a good way to quickly build an audience and generate content.
Note about my projectFor my social media project, I’m looking at p2p, because I’m more worried about scaling and longevity. Lemmy can get expensive to host due to duplication, so a big instance going down due to funding can fragment communities (though old data will live on any instance federated with that community). My project will use user devices for most data storage and retrieval, and a handful of (hopefully community funded) storage instances for availability and backups. There’s a lot less duplication, so hosting will be a fraction of what Lemmy costs since most data will be served by people near you. The only infra I’ll need is: - relay nodes to connect people - mostly short-lived STUN connections, but TURN will be supported for people behind CGNAT - backup storage nodes - I plan to only store less popular, older content And since I’ll only be handling text at first (pictures and whatnot will just be URLs), it should be really cheap. And that’s it. If I lose interest, someone probably already has their own storage nodes (lots of data hoarders out there) and can easily take over.
Yup, pocket is super easy to remove, so it’s really not an issue IMO. It’s scummy that it’s enabled by default, but it’s about the easiest anti-feature to remove.
After putting my account into "hibernation" for the past few weeks, I finally closed it. But I'm still looking for work. Thankfully I can still find positions (SRE and software dev) by just going directly to the company's site and finding a Jobs page.
Good luck to everyone else out there looking for work!
The point would be sharing data that’s not useful without the key. So you could share your public key and public metadata, but to access private data you’d need to get approved first. An approval request would be encrypted with your public key and contain a response key, and your response would contain your response encrypted with their key.
You obviously wouldn’t be able to control what they do with your data once decrypted, but all of that back and forth can happen in the clear without giving up private information. It’s the same way GPG/PGP works over email, just on a fediverse instead of SMTP.
It really wouldn’t be all that hard to implement, I just don’t think it would get any meaningful traction because LinkedIn is so reliant on the network effect.
Federation isn’t the magic bullet you make it out to be. In fact I disagree with pretty much everything you said, but we probably agree on some fundamental concepts. I just believe federation isn’t democratic, not even a little bit, it’s just silos of control.
I think we need distributed platforms where data is owned through encryption and signatures. Think gossip protocol with PGP encryption and web of trust based moderation. It’s still not democratic, but it puts control in the hands of individual users, not instance admins.
Similar to what Churchill said of democracy, Lemmy/ActivityPub is the worst form of social media, except for all the others. Federation isn’t the goal imo, decentralization is. It just turns out that a ActivityPub and Lemmy are available today, which is why I’m here. Reddit was the best option before now (open source frontend, friendly API, etc), but that changed so now I’m here.
So no, don’t enshrine a particular solution into law, focus on the principles of privacy and decentralization.
I’m not suggesting that at all. What I want is the next logical step after federation, which is basically data being distributed.
Basically, I want BitTorrent, but for social media. So there would be no instances, only communities (so no community@instance, just community). Right now, if lemmy.ml goes down, all of the communities hosted there go down and people would need to migrate elsewhere. With a distributed system, if someone drops out, the community goes on because it doesn’t live on any one system. Lemmy could mitigate that with a feature to move a community, but you still have the fragmentation issue.
The tricky part is moderation, but I’m thinking that could be done through votes and reports/blocks. Basically, if you vote the same way as someone consistently, you’ll start to trust their votes, reports, and blocks more than other uses, and you could enable automatic moderation to hide stuff based on someone else’s moderation.
So you would no longer need to rely on a centralized set of mods for a community, you’d instead pick mods yourself based on who you agree with. So you and I could have a separate set of “mods” for the same content. At any time, you could inspect the moderation to see if you agree with it, and your account would learn what you like and don’t like. This kills the “power hungry mods” issue that kills so many communities (i.e. I’ve left subreddits purely because of mods), though I’m a little worried it’ll push people even more into echo chambers.
The important thing, though, is that it puts the control directly into the hands of the users, with a set of tools to customize it. And there could be multiple competing clients to handle the moderation differently. I think it’s a bit more democratic than what Lemmy provides.
its okay to disagree
I absolutely agree.
My point is that I see federation as a stopgap to something better, not the destination, and it’s totally reasonable to disagree. I just think federation will have similar problems as centralized services, and that it’s inevitable once it grows to a certain size.
Maybe you’re just using this as an example, IDK, but I’ve seen a lot of people here on lemmy seem to conflate technology and political ideology. Technology can be a means to a political end, but equating the two just encourages dogmatic loyalty, and discourages diversity of thought.
But maybe I’m projecting here, IDK.
And yeah, I totally get the concern over splitting the community with too many different ideas (i.e. the Standards XKCD). My concern is that federation won’t scale. Users have demonstrated that they’ll largely join a handful of big instances, and those instances are poorly funded (often run by some generous benefactor) and fairly expensive to run. And that’s with just 50k or so monthly active users, imagine what’s going to happen if it ever gets to Reddit scale…
So that’s why I’m interested in distributed social networks, they scale really well with lots of users, in fact, they can work even better the more users they get (e.g. BitTorrent). So if we’re looking for a grassroots tech stack, it should be distributed. I’d really like someone else to build it (hence why I bring it up, to hopefully get someone to do it), but I’ll hack on it in the meantime because I find it fun.
That said, lemmy is good enough for now, hence why I’m here. I just don’t see it as a long term solution.
saying it will work when we have no signs for it kinda is
I’m actually working on a proof-of-concept, but I honestly would prefer to not head the project. I don’t think I can commit long term to a project like that, I hate being the center of attention, and honestly I think someone else would do a better job pushing it forward. But I’m intrigued by the tech, so I’m trying my hand at building it.
If I have something to show, I’ll post it here. But at least from the initial work I’ve done, I think it should scale nicely. I’ll probably get tired of it before “finishing,” but I guess time to tell.
I do like lemmy and the fediverse, I just want to be prepared for it falling apart. I think it’s seeing some uptake issues because of fundamentals of the fediverse (needing to understand federation just to join communities, for example), and that will limit its mainstream appeal. But I’ll keep using it until there’s a credible alternative.
voting to become federated
What exactly do you mean by this?
successor to crypto
Honestly, I think crypto is fine, and I’m particularly interested in privacy coins like Monero. The main issue they have is speculation, but honestly, that happens with fiat currencies as well, and if people start using something like Monero regularly that speculation will likely end up in the noise.
That said, I wouldn’t say no to something like GNU Taler getting picked up by a privacy-friendly organization. I’d love to see Mozilla integrate it so I could use Taler for payments to various online services.
I have actually made a few PRs when I first came to lemmy. I fixed a few bugs that bothered me, implemented a feature I wanted, and took a couple extra bugs from the issue tracker that bothered others. I thought about making my own client, but decided to try patching the existing ones first, and that ended up being easier.
I’ve stopped being active though since I’m satisfied with the platform as it is. I’ve considered hosting my own, which might get me to optimize the BE a bit, so I guess we’ll see. But I really do think the project is solving the wrong problems, so I prefer to spend my hobby time experimenting with P2P apps since I think that’s what we’ll ultimately want, but I’ll absolutely help if there’s any project that’s remotely close to what I want.
I don’t have anything to show yet since it’s rough and I don’t want to publish anything without a good moderation story, but hopefully I’ll have something later this year.
new search function
I almost did, but the current one (new since I was originally interested) is good enough. Maybe I’ll add it to Jerboa or something since it completely lacks post/comment search AFAIK (should be easy now), but searching on my mobile browser works well enough.
But this gets back to the core design decisions. It can’t search stuff it doesn’t have cached locally, and abusing ActivityPub to broadcast search would have a risk of enabling amplification attacks.
The proper solution to search, imo, is a separate service that indexes as much of the fediverse as possible. That’s a massive project, and about on the scale of building a replacement, not to mention hosting costs. I could probably build it as a P2P app though, but at that point I might as well continue with my project since it has other benefits as well (e.g. single namespace, almost no hosting costs outside a few relays, etc).
Voting, as in you vote for something to happen. Democracy. We should federate it so everyone can do it, probably cryptographically or some other way.
Right, but how does that actually work? Every proposal I’ve seen for distributed voting systems has issues, and federating it won’t solve them. Here are a few off the top of my head:
barrier to entry - how are you going to get Grandma to use it?
malware voting on your behalf
privacy - how can you prove dead people aren’t voting while also preventing people from knowing if you voted?
are normal people going to trust it? We have enough issues with people not trusting voting machines, despite no evidence that voting machines have been exploited to any real degree
I’m satisfied with the current system in my area, which is mail ballots with a barcode so voters can see whether their vote was counted. That’s good enough, to the point where I’m going to put my efforts toward getting better voting systems (i.e. ranked, approval, or STAR voting) instead of more cryptography.
You‘re making an alternative to the fediverse because of issues you cant be bothered to solve
I’m making an alternative because the issues I want to solve are fundamental to federation, namely:
confusing namespaces - you need “community@instance”, and most people would prefer just "community"
power hungry mods - the ones I’ve seen are okay, but they were also okay on Reddit until they weren’t; we could vote for mods, but then interested parties could just bot spam their way in
hosting costs are high - you need to store everything for every community your users are interested in; that’s not going to scale well, especially with so much duplication
I can’t submit a PR to fix those, because if I try, it’ll just be a hack that’s going to have repercussions. Those are design decisions we’ll just have to live with for now.
So I’m addressing it with a personal research project, and here’s briefly how I’m solving them:
no namespaces, just "topics"
no permanent moderators, moderation is based on people you explicitly or implicitly trust (everyone would start with some default set)
hosting costs are $0, unless you run a relay on a $5 VPS; all storage is on user devices (aside from caching nodes to help with availability)
The hardest part is moderation, which is also the biggest selling point, at least until lemmy instance admins can no longer afford to keep hosting.
I think I can make an ActivityPub bridge as well, and I may end up having it act like a lemmy instance to help seed with data. But that’s not in the initial goals, I just want to see if client-side moderation based on votes and whatnot can actually work well.
Oh, I’m not saying the issues it solves aren’t important, I’m saying it’s focusing on the wrong goals.
What I want out of lemmy is a credible Reddit alternative (so link aggregator with comments), that will be around long term with minimal disruption. It succeeds as a link aggregator, I’m worried about longevity based on its design.
Lemmy also had a goal of being on ActivityPub. Link aggregators (I assume) have a ton more shared data than something like Mastodon. But I don’t know for sure, I haven’t hosted either, it’s just a hunch. Likewise, people already complained about having to deal with a ton of instances on Mastodon, which seems to be an adoption issue for new users. Those aren’t solveable with lemmy as designed since they’re quirks of federation, but it was probably a faster way to get something out.
I want to be able to see all communities, not posts or comments… together with a rought member and post count
Ok, that’s pretty reasonable. I’m not sure how syncing those statistics would go without subscribing, but it’s probably not a ton of work.
But isn’t that essentially what [Lemmy Explorer] (lemmyverse.net/instance/lemmy.world/communities) is for? You get all of that info, and can narrow by instance if you want, even if your instance doesn’t federate with it.
Not sure if it was you, but there’s an issue for it with generally positive responses. I agree with Nutomic’s concern that this could be a lot of data (world alone has >10k communities), but as another user mentioned, we could filter by active communities and drastically reduce that.
The reason we are all here and the ultimate goal of lemmy and the fediverse imo is agency, nothing else
That’s pretty vague IMO.
I’m here because I want Reddit, but Reddit made some choices I strongly disagree with, such as:
effectively closing its API, which killed my favorite apps
selling user data (more recent)
“new Reddit,” which harvests more data than before; also, new Reddit isn’t open source AFAIK
sacking mods and probably replacing them with AI
I honestly don’t care about federation or ActivityPub, I’m just here because it replaces a service I like but refuse to use. Maybe that’s what you mean by agency, but for me personally, I’d just not use any social media if lemmy didn’t exist (or maybe I’d go back to hacker news).
So that’s the lens I’m seeing things through. I see Lemmy as a temporary stopgap, and I’d really rather not invest a bunch of time into something I think needs to be replaced. But I do believe in cleaning up my corner of the world, so I’ll contribute here and there, and I hope to donate to my instance once they accept donations (I’ve asked).
Maybe we should connect on github or something
Perhaps. I’ll save this comment so I can come back later if interested. I’m not in a position to really commit to anything right now, but perhaps starting a Matrix channel for like-minded people would be interesting.
I’d much rather keep discussions in some publicly accessible medium than over DMs, so hopefully someone else can pick up the torch when you or I inevitably lose interest.
That said, once I have a working project, I’ll post it on a few relevant communities for review (probably under an alt). So you’ll at least hopefully see that. I work primarily in Rust and plan to build my MVP with Tauri and Iroh, but I’m fairly comfortable in a variety of languages (Python and Typescript at my day job, lots of years with Go, looking into Haskell because FP rox and I want to study SimpleX chat).
If you want help on a project, post about it and I’ll take a look. I’m comfortable with most fullstack stuff (databases, React, Docker, etc).