@tshirtman 🤭😵 Although one does wonder why you even need such a thing. Your own lamp at home is a tester too, right? If you flip the switch and light doesn't happen, it's broken.
@petrichor7020 I assume it's to test as you buy, as you could've come back with a broken lamp and say it was dead on arrival, there is no way to tell if the mall was used thousands of hours already. But not sure how commonly people would open a package in the shop and test a lamp before buying.
Aprés des années de bons et loyaux services (mais pas vraiment d'évolutions) MessagEase a récemment ajouté un popup annonçant la nécessité de passer à un abonnement sous peu, j'ai du mal a trouver ça justifié vu que c'est plus ou moins un produit finis.
@yantor3d I would argue for fully spelled out argument names, i.e source, target (or destination?), unless it's a convention in your codebase to use shortened names.
I would have used pathlib.Path instead of os.path, but that's an implementation detail, shouldn't matter (much) to users, thought returning a Path object is generally better than a string representing a path.
Could the function name be clearer regarding the usage?
@brianch it is in Brazil! In Petropolis more specifically, thanks for the info, maybe the name will be enough to learn more about the rules, the initial placement is pretty interesting.
@BlackAzizAnansi I keep in mind that large groups of people, some of them very smart, are paid significant amounts of money to work on it full time, and we are bombarded with info to be critical about all the time, so it's absolutely not a fair fight, I fell for it before, and I will fall for it again, though I try not to, of course.
@tshirtman@BlackAzizAnansi True, that. A good technique though is 'falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus'. A source caught telling porkies on something you are knowledgable on can be discounted on everything else also. You don't have to goose chase all the lies.
@martinvermeer@BlackAzizAnansi yes, of course I adjust my prior for a source when I catch error, inaccuracies, or what seems like straight up lies, but much of the info we come across these days is poorly sourced, and shared informally on social media. And that makes a lot of sources to keep track of. When I encounter a long list of arguments I also understand that showing a sample to be false should be enough, the rest is unlikely to be worth my time, but many people fall in these traps.
This German guy (60+ yo) apparently took as many covid vaccines as the system let him, which is a lot, 200+ over 2 years, commonly taking multiple shot a day, for many consecutive days. Certainly a lot more than could possibly be useful, but at least, that’s a nice datapoint about the safety of the vaccine. Apparenlty no adverse effect, though hard to state if there is any benefit over a more normal regimen.