kyonshi, (edited )
@kyonshi@dice.camp avatar

yeah, the future of online discussions has arrived in the as well: found the replies of a guy regarding energy to be a bit too suspiciously samey sounding, so I checked with an detector. lo and behold!

(is there maybe a browser plugin to detect this stuff automatically?)

marta,
@marta@corteximplant.net avatar

@kyonshi remember that these ai detectors are as trustworthy as the things they are checking, meaning not at all. And they can cause harm, like flagging actual people (potentially neurodivergent people more often).

kyonshi,
@kyonshi@dice.camp avatar

@marta yeah, but in this case i find it rather likely it actually was AI generated to flood the discussion with lots of text

kyonshi,
@kyonshi@dice.camp avatar

@marta I noticed nuclear shills in a few places posting suspiciously same-sounding stuff.

marta,
@marta@corteximplant.net avatar

@kyonshi because the arguments for nuclear are always the same arguments (for context, I'm pro nuclear and a physics student)

  • Very clean
  • Very safe
  • Already viable to power entire countries as opposed to solar and wind
  • Mostly independent of geography as opposed to water and thermal
  • Bad around tectonic plates (see Japan)
  • Expensive in the short term
kyonshi,
@kyonshi@dice.camp avatar

@marta yeah, and the arguments against it also always are the same, and because both sides value different things neither can come to am agreement

(Anyway, in this case I noticed that of his ten comments 8 were shown to be AI generated and 2 were human created. The AI ones were the same length, had proper formatting, and the usual AI abundance of filler words, while the other two were shorter, did have non-standard formatting, and sounded more natural)

marta,
@marta@corteximplant.net avatar

@kyonshi (yeah I'm not saying this isn't AI, I would just be wary of trusting these "is this AI" websites)

kyonshi,
@kyonshi@dice.camp avatar

@marta well, I wouldn't have put it through the detector if I hadn't already thought it sounded generated

michaelgraaf,
@michaelgraaf@cheeseburger.social avatar

@kyonshi No doubt the "detector" itself relies on "A.I." so we are headed for an arms race...

kyonshi,
@kyonshi@dice.camp avatar

@michaelgraaf i think it mostly works by using pattern matching, which is not really AI.

On the other hand calling LLMs AI is also kind of false advertising

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fediverse
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • everett
  • vwfavf
  • rosin
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines